DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Schulte v. CH PETERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, 153 N.W.2d 130.

66 citing documents.

  • Brening v. Roto-Press, Inc. 237 N.W.2d 383 Minn. 1975
  • Brening v. Roto-Press, Inc. 237 N.W.2d 383 Minn. 1975
    We have previously stated that “[t]he concept of temporary total disability is primarily dependent upon the employee’s ability to find and hold a job, not his physical condition.” Schulte v. C. H. Peterson Const. Co. 278 Minn. 79, 83
  • North Star Research Institute v. County of Hennepin 236 N.W.2d 754 Minn. 1975
  • Lemieux v. Mortenson 234 N.W.2d 897 Minn. 1975
  • Lemieux v. Mortenson 234 N.W.2d 897 Minn. 1975
    It is the position of relator that language used in Schulte v. C. H. Peterson Const. Co. 278 Minn. 79, 84 , supports the rule for which he contends.
  • North Star Research Institute v. County of Hennepin 236 N.W.2d 754 Minn. 1975
    We said ( 278 Minn. 79 , ): “It is a restriction which, in our opinion, serves a private rather than a public objective,” and upon that ground exemption was denied.
  • Williams v. Molded Electronics, Inc. 233 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1975
  • Williams v. Molded Electronics, Inc. 233 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1975
    5, this court has formulated the rule that “a person is totally disabled if his physical condition, in combination with his age, training, and experience, and the type of work available in his community, causes him to be unable to secure anything more than sporadic employment resulting in an insubstantial income.” Schulte v. C. H. Peterson Const. Co. 278 Minn. 79, 83
  • Bertsch v. Varnum Lumber & Fuel Co. 228 N.W.2d 228 Minn. 1975
  • Bertsch v. Varnum Lumber & Fuel Co. 228 N.W.2d 228 Minn. 1975
    gs him an income.” In interpreting this language, we have formulated the rule that— “* * * a person is totally disabled if his physical condition, in combination with his age, training, and experience, and the type of work available in his community, causes him to be unable to secure anything more than sporadic employment resulting in an insubstantial income.” Schulte v. C. H. Peterson Const. Co. 278 Minn. 79, 83
  • Naebers v. Shell Oil Company 224 N.W.2d 160 Minn. 1974
  • Naebers v. Shell Oil Company 224 N.W.2d 160 Minn. 1974
    5, we have formulated the rule that— “* * * a person is totally disabled if his physical condition, in combination with his age, training, and experience, and the type of work available in his community, causes him to be unable to secure anything more than sporadic employment resulting in an insubstantial income.” Schulte v. C. H. Peterson Const. Co. 278 Minn. 79, 83
  • Mechling v. Jasper Stone Company 198 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 1972
  • Mechling v. Jasper Stone Company 198 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 1972
    4 Employee cites Durant v. Butler Brothers, 275 Minn. 487 , Schulte v. C. H. Peterson Const. Co. 278 Minn. 79 , Lockner v. The Eich Motor Co. 283 Minn. 171
  • Nierengarten v. State, Department of Highways 163 N.W.2d 862 Minn. 1969
  • Nierengarten v. State, Department of Highways 163 N.W.2d 862 Minn. 1969
    Hertz v. Watab Paper Co. 180 Minn. 177 , ; Caddy v. R. Maturi & Co. 217 Minn. 207 , 14 N. W. (2d) 393 ; Schulte v. C. H. Peterson Const. Co. 278 Minn. 79 , 153 N. W. (2d) 130 .