Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co., 158 N.W.2d 580.
- Shields Law Group, LLC, Spencer Shields v. Gustafson Gluek PLLC, Watts ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- Shields Law Group, LLC, Spencer Shields v. Gustafson Gluek PLLC, Watts ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- Eugene and Sandra Alexander, et al., Plaintiffs, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-
Mark J. Kallenbach, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Co., (addressing accrual of negligence claim and stating that “the alleged negligence .
- A19-0155 Minn. 2020
-
Minn. 2019
Co. , (“[T]he alleged negligence .
-
A19-0155
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Co., (applying a similar reasoning to silicosis, an “insidious disease” that “develops over a long period of time”).
- Peter G. Noe, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
- Minn. 2018
- Security Bank & Trust Co. v. Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd. 897 N.W.2d 821 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- Security Bank & Trust Co. v. Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd. 897 N.W.2d 821 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- Jerry Wayne Cole v. Alexander Allen Wutzke 884 N.W.2d 634 Minn. 2016
-
Jerry Wayne Cole v. Alexander Allen Wutzke
884 N.W.2d 634
Minn. 2016
Co., 280 Minn. 147, 153 n.2, n.2 (1968).
- Jerry Wayne Cole v. Alexander Allen Wutzke 868 N.W.2d 925 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
Jerry Wayne Cole v. Alexander Allen Wutzke
868 N.W.2d 925
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Co., 280 Minn. 147, 153 n.2, n.2 (1968)).
- Patti Walsh, as Trustee for the Heirs and Next of Kin of Dean Patrick Walsh v. Flint Group … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
Patti Walsh, as Trustee for the Heirs and Next of Kin of Dean Patrick Walsh v. Flint Group …
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co., 280 Minn. 147, 153
- Sanchez v. State 816 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 2012
-
Sanchez v. State
816 N.W.2d 550
Minn. 2012
Co., 280 Minn. 147, 153 , (“Under our statutes it has been determined that ignorance of a cause of action not involving continuing negligence or trespass, or fraud on the part of the defendant, does not toll the accrual of a cause of action.”).
- Park Nicollet Clinic v. Hamann 808 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 2011
- Park Nicollet Clinic v. Hamann 808 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 2011
- Lickteig v. Kolar 782 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 2010
-
Lickteig v. Kolar
782 N.W.2d 810
Minn. 2010
Co., 280 Minn. 147, 150-51
- Fleeger v. Wyeth 771 N.W.2d 524 Minn. 2009
-
Fleeger v. Wyeth
771 N.W.2d 524
Minn. 2009
Co., 280 Minn. 147, 153 , ).
- MacRae v. Group Health Plan, Inc. 753 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 2008
-
MacRae v. Group Health Plan, Inc.
753 N.W.2d 711
Minn. 2008
In Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co., 280 Minn. 147, 153 , we construed a statute of limitations similar to the one at issue here and held that a cause of action accrues “at such time as it could be brought in a court *717 of law without dismissal for failure to state a claim.” See also Antone, d at 335 ; Herrmann v. McMenomy &
- Hempel v. Creek House Trust 743 N.W.2d 305 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
-
Hempel v. Creek House Trust
743 N.W.2d 305
Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Statutes of limitations serve dual purposes: “the repose of the defendant and the fair and effective administration of justice.” Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co., 280 Minn. 147 , 153 n. 2, , 584 n. 2 (1968).
- Antone v. Mirviss 720 N.W.2d 331 Minn. 2006
-
Antone v. Mirviss
720 N.W.2d 331
Minn. 2006
Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co., 280 Minn. 147, 152-53
- Molloy v. Meier 679 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 2004
-
Molloy v. Meier
679 N.W.2d 711
Minn. 2004
Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co., 280 Minn. 147, 152-53 , see also Herrmann v. McMenomy & Severson, *721 643 (Minn.1999) (applying Dalton to legal malpractice claim).
- Noske v. Friedberg 670 N.W.2d 740 Minn. 2003
-
Noske v. Friedberg
670 N.W.2d 740
Minn. 2003
Herrmann, d at 643 ; see also Bonhiver v. Graff, 311 Minn. 111, 117 , Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co., 280 Minn. 147, 153
- Molloy v. Meier 660 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
- Broek v. Park Nicollet Health Services 660 N.W.2d 439 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
-
Molloy v. Meier
660 N.W.2d 444
Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Co., 280 Minn. 147, 151 , Peterson, d at 638 .
-
Broek v. Park Nicollet Health Services
660 N.W.2d 439
Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Co., 280 Minn. 147, 154 , (rejecting “subjective determination” of accrual of cause of action).
- State Ex Rel. Hatch v. Employers Insurance of Wausau 644 N.W.2d 820 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- State Ex Rel. Hatch v. Employers Insurance of Wausau 644 N.W.2d 820 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- Conwed Corp. v. Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Co. 634 N.W.2d 401 Minn. 2001
-
Conwed Corp. v. Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Co.
634 N.W.2d 401
Minn. 2001
Co., 280 Minn. 147, 152-53 , -84 (1968) (holding that the employee’s third-party tort claim stemming from the employee’s occupational disease does not accrue, and the statute of limitations does not begin to run, until the occupational disease begins to manifest itself).
- Herrmann v. McMenomy & Severson 590 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 1999
-
Herrmann v. McMenomy & Severson
590 N.W.2d 641
Minn. 1999
See Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co., 280 Minn. 147, 152-53
- Tharalson v. Hennepin Parks 551 N.W.2d 510 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
-
Tharalson v. Hennepin Parks
551 N.W.2d 510
Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Co., 280 Minn. 147 , 153 n. 2, , 586 n. 2 (1968).
- Hermeling v. Minnesota Fire & Casualty Co. 548 N.W.2d 270 Minn. 1996
-
Hermeling v. Minnesota Fire & Casualty Co.
548 N.W.2d 270
Minn. 1996
Co., 280 Minn. 147, 153 , ).
- Haberle v. Buchwald 480 N.W.2d 351 Minn. Ct. App. 1992