Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co., 158 N.W.2d 580.

98 citing documents.

Haberle v. Buchwald 480 N.W.2d 351 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Peterson v. St. Cloud Hospital 460 N.W.2d 635 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Peterson v. St. Cloud Hospital 460 N.W.2d 635 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
(citing Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co., 280 Minn. 147, 153 , ).
Francis v. Hansing 449 N.W.2d 479 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Francis v. Hansing 449 N.W.2d 479 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co., 280 Minn. 147 , the plaintiff had worked for Dow Chemical and was exposed to a product called vythene.
Levin v. C.O.M.B. Co. 441 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 1989
Levin v. C.O.M.B. Co. 441 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 1989
A cause of action accrues when the right to institute and maintain a lawsuit arises, when the action can be brought in a court of law without dismissal for failure to state a cause of action, Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co., 280 Minn. 147 , and it has long been settled that a cause of action for breach of contract accrues on the breach of the terms of the contract.
St. Aubin v. Burke 434 N.W.2d 282 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
St. Aubin v. Burke 434 N.W.2d 282 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co., 280 Minn. 147, 153
Sabes & Richman, Inc. v. Muenzer 431 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Sabes & Richman, Inc. v. Muenzer 431 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co., 280 Minn. 147, 154
Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & Clinics 426 N.W.2d 425 Minn. 1988
Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & Clinics 426 N.W.2d 425 Minn. 1988
Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co., 280 Minn. 147, 153
Thiele v. Stich 425 N.W.2d 580 Minn. 1988
Thiele v. Stich 425 N.W.2d 580 Minn. 1988
See Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co., 280 Minn. 147, 153
Wittmer v. Ruegemer 419 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 1988
Wittmer v. Ruegemer 419 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 1988
Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co., 280 Minn. 147, 154
Koderick v. Snyder Bros. Drug, Inc. 413 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Koderick v. Snyder Bros. Drug, Inc. 413 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
II “As a general rule, the cause of action accrues when the accident occurs.” Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co., 280 Minn. 147, 151
Greenbrier Village Condominium Two Ass'n v. Keller Investment, Inc. 409 N.W.2d 519 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
GREENBRIER VILL. CONDO. 2 v. Keller Inv. 409 N.W.2d 519 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
GREENBRIER VILL. CONDO. 2 v. Keller Inv. 409 N.W.2d 519 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co., [ 280 Minn. 147 ], 158 *
Greenbrier Village Condominium Two Ass'n v. Keller Investment, Inc. 409 N.W.2d 519 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co., [ 280 Minn. 147 ], 158 *
Wittmer v. Ruegemer 402 N.W.2d 187 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Wittmer v. Ruegemer 402 N.W.2d 187 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co., 280 Minn. 147, 153
Pederson v. American Lutheran Church 404 N.W.2d 887 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Pederson v. American Lutheran Church 404 N.W.2d 887 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co., 280 Minn. 147, 153
Hendrickson v. Magney Construction Co. 402 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Hendrickson v. Magney Construction Co. 402 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co., 280 Minn. 147, 153
Grimm v. O'CONNOR 392 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Grimm v. O'CONNOR 392 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Bonhiver v. Graff, 311 Minn. 111 , (action against accountant and accounting firm for negligence); Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co., 280 Minn. 147 , (products liability action).
DeRogatis Ex Rel. DeRogatis v. Mayo Clinic 390 N.W.2d 773 Minn. 1986
DeRogatis Ex Rel. DeRogatis v. Mayo Clinic 390 N.W.2d 773 Minn. 1986
In Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co., 280 Minn. 147 , we held that an action for wrongful death would accrue at such time as it could be maintained without dismissal for failure to state a claim.
O'Neill v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 381 N.W.2d 439 Minn. 1986
O'Neill v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 381 N.W.2d 439 Minn. 1986
Weston v. Jones, supra (statute of limitations for breach of contract begins running with the breach even though damages do not occur until afterwards); cf. Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co., 280 Minn. 147, 154 , (the tort statute of limitations begins with the negligent act and some damage, even if the ultimate damage is unknown or unpredictable).
Lee v. Industrial Electric Co. 375 N.W.2d 572 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Karels v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 371 N.W.2d 617 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Karels v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. 371 N.W.2d 617 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co., 280 Minn. 147, 153
Toombs v. Daniels 361 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 1985
Toombs v. Daniels 361 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 1985
See City of Coon Rapids v. Suburban Engineering, Inc., 283 Minn. 151 , Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co., 280 Minn. 147
DeCosse v. Armstrong Cork Co. 319 N.W.2d 45 Minn. 1982
DeCosse v. Armstrong Cork Co. 319 N.W.2d 45 Minn. 1982
Though the legislature may not wish to aid the defrauder, it could reasonably desire in the interest of repose not to apply the so-called discovery rule, see Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co., 280 Minn. 147 , to wrongful death actions.
Capitol Supply Co. v. City of St. Paul 316 N.W.2d 554 Minn. 1982
Capitol Supply Co. v. City of St. Paul 316 N.W.2d 554 Minn. 1982
See Bonhiver v. Graff, 311 Minn. 111 , Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co., 280 Minn. 147
Bonhiver v. Graff 248 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 1976
Bonhiver v. Graff 248 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 1976
As we have *117 interpreted the rule, the action accrues “at such time as it could be brought in a court of law without dismissal for failure to state a claim.” Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co. 280 Minn. 147, 153
Notch v. Victory Granite Co. 238 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1976
Notch v. Victory Granite Co. 238 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1976
Like other statutes of limitation, it is presumably intended to bar stale claims, thereby insuring the “repose of the defendant and the fair and effective administration of justice.” Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co. 280 Minn. 147 , 153 n.2, see, also, 3 Larson, Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 78.20.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by