DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Johnson, 156 N.W.2d 218.

70 citing documents.

  • Emmanuel Troy Davis, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
    Once a defendant accepts the State’s offer to plea rather than proceed to trial, the Court has a specific and narrow role: “[the Court’s] proper role is one of ‘discreet inquiry into the propriety of the settlement.’” ( (emphasis added)).
  • State of Minnesota, Minn. 2021
    69 (Minn. 1889); Hall, Coleman
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
  • Jetaun Helen Wheeler, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    is not solely a prohibition on judicial plea offers, promises, or threats.
  • Wheeler v. State 909 N.W.2d 558 Minn. 2018
  • Wheeler v. State 909 N.W.2d 558 Minn. 2018
    In State v. Johnson , 279 Minn. 209 , , 223 (1968), we recognized the principle that a district court judge should not "participate in the plea bargaining negotiation itself."
  • Jetaun Helen Wheeler v. State of Minnesota 889 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
  • Jetaun Helen Wheeler v. State of Minnesota 889 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
  • State of Minnesota v. Lloyd Matthew McKenzie Minn. Ct. App. 2016
  • State of Minnesota v. Lloyd Matthew McKenzie Minn. Ct. App. 2016
    State v. Johnson, 279 Minn. 209, 215–16, 216 & n.11, & n.11 (1968) (footnotes omitted).
  • Joseph Jermaine Henderson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
  • Joseph Jermaine Henderson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
    at 414-15 (citing State v. Johnson, 279 Minn. 209, 216 n.11, n.11 (1968)).
  • State v. Klug 839 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
  • State v. Klug 839 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
    See, e.g., State v. Johnson, 279 Minn. 209, 214
  • State v. Sailee 792 N.W.2d 90 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
  • State v. Sailee 792 N.W.2d 90 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
    State v. Johnson, 279 Minn. 209, 216 , (prohibiting court participation in plea bargaining); (citing impropriety of the court’s advance promise of a particular sentence).
  • State v. Hannibal 786 N.W.2d 314 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
  • State v. Hannibal 786 N.W.2d 314 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
    See State v. Johnson, 279 Minn. 209 , 215-16 & n. 11, , 228 & n. 11 (1968) (declaring that district court should not abandon its role of “independent examiner” and “usurp” responsibility of counsel by participating directly in plea negotiations).
  • Melde v. State 778 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
  • Melde v. State 778 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
    The district court has a role to play in plea negotiations, but it may not “usurp the responsibility of counsel or become excessively involved in plea negotiations and may not improperly inject itself into plea negotiations.” (citing State v. Johnson, 279 Minn. 209, 215-16 , ).
  • State v. Meredyk 754 N.W.2d 596 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
  • State v. Meredyk 754 N.W.2d 596 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
    4 See State v. Johnson, 279 Minn. 209, 216 , (stating that “the court should neither usurp the responsibility of counsel nor participate in the plea bargaining negotiation itself’).
  • Anderson v. State 746 N.W.2d 901 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
  • Anderson v. State 746 N.W.2d 901 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
    State v. Johnson, 279 Minn. 209, 215-216
  • State v. Spraggins 742 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
  • State v. Spraggins 742 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
    State v. Johnson, 279 Minn. 209 , 216 n. 11, , 223 n. 11 (1968).
  • State v. Anyanwu 681 N.W.2d 411 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • State v. Anyanwu 681 N.W.2d 411 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
    See State v. Johnson, 279 Minn. 209, 215-16 , review denied (Minn. Feb.
  • Johnson v. State 641 N.W.2d 912 Minn. 2002
  • Johnson v. State 641 N.W.2d 912 Minn. 2002
    See State v. Johnson, 279 Minn. 209 , *918 214-15, -23 (1968).
  • State v. Schmit 601 N.W.2d 896 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Schmit 601 N.W.2d 896 Minn. 1999
    See State v. Johnson, 279 Minn. 209, 216
  • State v. Vahabi 529 N.W.2d 359 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
  • State v. Vahabi 529 N.W.2d 359 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
    Moe, d at 429 (court should not usurp the responsibility of counsel by participating directly in plea negotiations) (citing State v. Johnson, 279 Minn. 209, 215-16 , ).
  • Miles v. State 512 N.W.2d 601 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
  • Barnes v. State 489 N.W.2d 273 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
  • Barnes v. State 489 N.W.2d 273 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
    1 In approving the practice of plea bargaining, the supreme court has spoken of “the right of a defendant to be protected from improvident ‘plea bargaining.’ ” State v. Johnson, 279 Minn. 209, 214
  • State v. Moe 479 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
  • State v. Moe 479 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
    State v. Johnson, 279 Minn. 209, 215-16 , (emphasis in original; footnotes omitted).
  • State v. Vieburg 404 N.W.2d 312 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Vieburg 404 N.W.2d 312 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    State v. Johnston, 279 Minn. 209, 212
  • State v. Lockridge 269 N.W.2d 902 Minn. 1978
  • State v. Neumann 262 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1978
  • State v. Neumann 262 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1978
    State v. Taylor, 288 Minn. 37 , State v. Johnson, 279 Minn. 209 , cf. State v. Hoaglund, 307 Minn. 322 , see, generally, 5A Dunnell, Dig.
  • State v. Nelson 257 N.W.2d 356 Minn. 1977
  • State v. Nelson 257 N.W.2d 356 Minn. 1977
    State v. Johnson, 279 Minn. 209
  • Smude v. State 249 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 1976
  • Smude v. State 249 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 1976
    In State v. Johnson, 279 Minn. 209 , , (1968), and State v. Wolske, 280 Minn. 465 , this court approved the practice of plea bargaining, saying that it should be conducted openly.
  • State v. Hoaglund 240 N.W.2d 4 Minn. 1976
  • State v. Hoaglund 240 N.W.2d 4 Minn. 1976
    2 For earlier cases citing these standards, see State v. LaValla, 278 Minn. 63 , State v. Warren, 278 Minn. 119 , State v. Johnson, 279 Minn. 209