DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Chapman v. State, 162 N.W.2d 698.

98 citing documents.

  • State v. Lopez 379 N.W.2d 633 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Lopez 379 N.W.2d 633 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    Chapman v. State, 282 Minn. 13
  • State v. Garritsen 371 N.W.2d 251 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Garritsen 371 N.W.2d 251 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    Chapman v. State, 282 Minn. 13
  • State v. Hemmings 371 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Hemmings 371 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    Chapman v. State, 282 Minn. 13
  • Doughman v. State 351 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • Doughman v. State 351 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    Chapman v. State, 282 Minn. 13
  • State v. McElhaney 345 N.W.2d 800 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. McElhaney 345 N.W.2d 800 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    See Chapman v. State, 282 Minn. 13, 16
  • State v. Thomale 215 N.W.2d 809 Minn. 1974
  • State v. Thomale 215 N.W.2d 809 Minn. 1974
    The grounds for permitting withdrawal of guilty pleas are set forth in Chapman v. State, 282 Minn. 13
  • State v. Hopkins 198 N.W.2d 542 Minn. 1972
  • State v. Hopkins 198 N.W.2d 542 Minn. 1972
    Chapman v. State, 282 Minn. 13
  • State v. Williams 195 N.W.2d 581 Minn. 1972
  • State v. Robb 195 N.W.2d 587 Minn. 1972
  • State v. Robb 195 N.W.2d 587 Minn. 1972
    In Chapman v. State, 282 Minn. 13, 17 , we quoted with approval A. B. A. Standards for Criminal Justice, Pleas of Guilty, § 2.1 (Approved draft, 1968).
  • State v. Williams 195 N.W.2d 581 Minn. 1972
    In Chapman v. State, 282 Minn. 13, 19 , we held that a guilty plea may be withdrawn when necessary to correct a manifest injustice.
  • State v. Anderson 193 N.W.2d 637 Minn. 1971
  • State v. Anderson 193 N.W.2d 637 Minn. 1971
    State v. Wolske, 280 Minn. 465 , Chapman v. State, 282 Minn. 13 , A. B. A. Standards Relating to Pleas of Guilty (Approved Draft, 1968) § 2.1.
  • State v. Knight 192 N.W.2d 829 Minn. 1971
  • State v. Jacobs 192 N.W.2d 816 Minn. 1971
  • State v. Jacobs 192 N.W.2d 816 Minn. 1971
    State v. Jones, 267 Minn. 421 , Langer v. State, 287 Minn. 320, 321 , State v. Williams, 282 Minn. 240 , Chapman v. State, 282 Minn. 13, 18
  • State v. Knight 192 N.W.2d 829 Minn. 1971
    Chapman v. State, 282 Minn. 13 , fully discusses the point in issue and sets forth at length the standards which should guide the trial court in determining whether or not a plea of guilty should be vacated on defendant’s request.
  • State v. Dinneen 184 N.W.2d 16 Minn. 1971
  • State v. Dinneen 184 N.W.2d 16 Minn. 1971
    Defendant’s reliance on Chapman v. State, 282 Minn. 13 , 162 N. W. (2d) 698 , for the proposition that statements made by a defendant at the time of his plea negated the existence of an essential element of the crime charged and were inconsistent with the plea is simply not borne out in the instant case.
  • Beltowski v. State 183 N.W.2d 563 Minn. 1971
  • Beltowski v. State 183 N.W.2d 563 Minn. 1971
    He did not claim that withdrawal was necessary to correct a manifest injustice such as a denial of fundamental rights, or a failure of the prosecution to fulfill its part of a plea agreement, or meet any of the requirements set out in Chapman v. State, 282 Minn. 13 , 162 N. W. (2d) 698 , and State v. Wolske, 280 Minn. 465 , 160 N. W. (2d) 146 .
  • Jones v. State 179 N.W.2d 315 Minn. 1970
  • Jones v. State 179 N.W.2d 315 Minn. 1970
    In Chapman v. State, 282 Minn. 13, 16 , 162 N. W. (2d) 698, 700 , we considered the problem of when a guilty plea in a conviction may be withdrawn and a new trial allowed.
  • Coolen v. State 179 N.W.2d 81 Minn. 1970
  • State v. Taylor 178 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 1970
  • Coolen v. State 179 N.W.2d 81 Minn. 1970
    See, Chapman v. State, 282 Minn. 13 , 162 N. W. (2d) 698 .
  • State v. Taylor 178 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 1970
    State v. Johnson, 279 Minn. 209 , 156 N. W. (2d) 218 ; Chapman v. State, 282 Minn. 13 , 162 N. W. (2d) 698 .
  • Goggleye v. State 178 N.W.2d 737 Minn. 1970
  • Goggleye v. State 178 N.W.2d 737 Minn. 1970
    See, Chapman v. State, 282 Minn. 13 , 162 N. W. (2d) 698 ; State ex rel.
  • Langer v. State 178 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 1970
  • Langer v. State 178 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 1970
    Chapman v. State, 282 Minn. 13 , 162 N. W. (2d) 698 .
  • Knisley v. State 172 N.W.2d 769 Minn. 1969
  • Knisley v. State 172 N.W.2d 769 Minn. 1969
    In Chapman v. State, 282 Minn. 13 , 162 N. W. (2d) 698 , we made reference to the standards relating to pleas of guilty proposed by the American Bar Association Project on Minimum Standards for Criminal Justice.
  • State Ex Rel. Parks v. Tahash 170 N.W.2d 448 Minn. 1969
  • State Ex Rel. Parks v. Tahash 170 N.W.2d 448 Minn. 1969
    he following rule: “* * * In order for the confession to invalidate the conviction, two factors must be present: (1) Defendant was misled as to his constitutional rights with regard to the illegally obtained confession; and (2) defendant’s plea of guilty must have been prompted by the existence of the confession.” See, also, State v. Richter, 270 Minn. 307 , 133 N. W. (2d) 537 ; Chapman v. State, 282 Minn. 13 , 162 N. W. (2d) 698 .
  • Riggers v. State 169 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 1969
  • Riggers v. State 169 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 1969
    The decisions are collected in Chapman v. State, 282 Minn. 13 , 162 N. W. (2d) 698 .
  • State Ex Rel. Thunstrom v. Tahash 167 N.W.2d 139 Minn. 1969
  • State Ex Rel. Thunstrom v. Tahash 167 N.W.2d 139 Minn. 1969
    Our precedents dealing with the showing which must be made to jus *242 tify vacating a plea of guilty are reviewed in Chapman v. State, 282 Minn. 13 , 162 N. W. (2d) 698 , supplemented by State v. Linehan, 282 Minn. 254 , 164 N. W. (2d) 616 .
  • State v. Williams 163 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 1969
  • State v. Williams 163 N.W.2d 868 Minn. 1969
    See, Chapman v. State, 282 Minn. 13 , 162 N. W. (2d) 698 ; State v. Olson, 270 Minn. 329 , 133 N. W. (2d) 489 ; State v. Jones, 267 Minn. 421 , 127 N. W. (2d) 153 ; State ex rel.