Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hunt v. Nevada State Bank, 172 N.W.2d 292.

141 citing documents.

Myth Live II Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State Bank, -300 (Minn. 1969) (explaining that the denial of a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction is immediately reviewable because the effect is that “a defendant is compelled thereby to take up the burden of litigation in this state that might otherwise be avoided”); (Min
U.S. Holdings, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
But an order denying a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is immediately appealable as a matter of right under Minnesota Rule of Civil Appellate Procedure 103.03(j)
A24-0478 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Lisa Stone, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
The Estate of Michael T. Conneran, Jr., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Marriage of: Jane Ann Holm, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Further, the principle that allegations in a compl aint must be taken as true applies to the review of a motion to dismiss a complaint, which is not at issue here.
Thomas R. Blanck, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-08 (Minn. 1969) (“[I]t can be inferred that if § 60A.21 doesn’t apply (and it would n ot when the insurance company has contacts not related to insurance), then § 303.13 does.”).
Cruz-Guzman v. State 916 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2018
Cruz-Guzman v. State 916 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2018
State Bank , 285 Minn. 77 , , 301 (1969) (holding that there is "an appeal of right" from an order denying a motion to dismiss for nonjoinder of an indispensable party).
Cox v. Mid-Minnesota Mut. Ins. Co. 909 N.W.2d 540 Minn. 2018
Cox v. Mid-Minnesota Mut. Ins. Co. 909 N.W.2d 540 Minn. 2018
State Bank , 285 Minn. 77 , , 300 (1969) ("[A]n order denying a motion to quash service of summons is appealable."
Jennifer L. DeCook, Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. Olmsted Medical Center, Inc., Brenda J. Hanson, R.N., and Darlene M. Pratt, R.N., … 875 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 2016
Volkman v. Hanover Investments, Inc. 843 N.W.2d 789 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Volkman v. Hanover Investments, Inc. 843 N.W.2d 789 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Hunt v. Nevada State Bank, 285 Minn. 77, 88-89 , -300 (1969), cert.
Beuning Family LP v. County of Stearns 817 N.W.2d 122 Minn. 2012
Aon Corp. v. Haskins 817 N.W.2d 737 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Aon Corp. v. Haskins 817 N.W.2d 737 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Hunt v. Nevada State Bank, 285 Minn. 77, 88-89 , -300 (1969); see also McGowan v. Our Savior’s Lutheran Church, (motion for summary judgment based on lack of subject-matter jurisdiction); -64 (Minn.1986) (motion for summary judgment based on governmental immun
State v. Ali 806 N.W.2d 45 Minn. 2011
State v. Ali 806 N.W.2d 45 Minn. 2011
Lake Superior Center Authority v. Hammel, Green & Abrahamson, Inc. 715 N.W.2d 458 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Lake Superior Center Authority v. Hammel, Green & Abrahamson, Inc. 715 N.W.2d 458 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Hunt v. Nevada State Bank, 285 Minn. 77, 88-89 , -300 (1969), cert.
Janssen v. Best & Flanagan, LLP 704 N.W.2d 759 Minn. 2005
Janssen v. Best & Flanagan, LLP 704 N.W.2d 759 Minn. 2005
State Bank, 285 Minn. 77, 88 , (holding dismissal based on lack of personal jurisdiction is appealable).
Broehm v. Mayo Clinic Rochester 690 N.W.2d 721 Minn. 2005
Podvin v. Jamar Co. 655 N.W.2d 645 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Podvin v. Jamar Co. 655 N.W.2d 645 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
See Hunt v. Nevada State Bank, 285 Minn. 77, 88 , -300 (1969).
Kastner v. Star Trails Ass'n 646 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 2002
Kastner v. Star Trails Ass'n 646 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 2002
See, e.g., Hunt v. Nevada State Bank, 285 Minn. 77, 88-91 , -301 (1969); McGowan, d at 832-33
Van Slooten v. Estate of Schneider-Janzen 623 N.W.2d 269 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Van Slooten v. Estate of Schneider-Janzen 623 N.W.2d 269 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Hunt v. Nevada State Bank, 285 Minn. 77, 88-89 , -300 (1969).
O'SELL v. Peterson 595 N.W.2d 870 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
O'SELL v. Peterson 595 N.W.2d 870 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Hunt v. Nevada State Bank, 285 Minn. 77, 88-89 , -300 (1969).
Tullis v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co. 556 N.W.2d 7 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Tullis v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co. 556 N.W.2d 7 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Hunt v. Nevada State Bank, 285 Minn. 77, 82-83 , -97 (1969), cert.
Cefis v. Cefis 555 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Cefis v. Cefis 555 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Hunt v. Nevada State Bank, 285 Minn. 77, 88-89 , -300 (1969), cert.
Willis v. County of Sherburne 555 N.W.2d 277 Minn. 1996
Willis v. County of Sherburne 555 N.W.2d 277 Minn. 1996
Hunt v. Nevada State Bank, 285 Minn. 77, 88-89 , -300 (1969), cert.
Behm v. John Nuveen & Co., Inc. 555 N.W.2d 301 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Behm v. John Nuveen & Co., Inc. 555 N.W.2d 301 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Hunt v. Nevada State Bank, 285 Minn. 77, 82-83 , -97 (1969), cert.
Semiconductor Automation, Inc. v. Lloyds of London 543 N.W.2d 123 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Semiconductor Automation, Inc. v. Lloyds of London 543 N.W.2d 123 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Asbestos Cases, (citing Hunt v. Nevada State Bank, 285 Minn. 77 , ).
McGowan v. Our Savior's Lutheran Church 527 N.W.2d 830 Minn. 1995
McGowan v. Our Savior's Lutheran Church 527 N.W.2d 830 Minn. 1995
Hunt v. Nevada State Bank, 285 Minn. 77, 88-89 , (order denying motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is appealable as of right), cert.
Larsen v. Wright County Human Service Agency-Day Care Division 526 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Larsen v. Wright County Human Service Agency-Day Care Division 526 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
(citing Hunt v. Nevada State Bank, 285 Minn. 77, 89 , and Minn.R.Civ.App.P.
Larson v. Babcock & Wilcox 525 N.W.2d 589 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Larson v. Babcock & Wilcox 525 N.W.2d 589 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Minn. Stat. § 645.22 (1992); see also Hunt v. Nevada State Bank, 285 Minn. 77, 98 , cert.
In Re ST 512 N.W.2d 894 Minn. 1994
In re Petition to Adopt S.T. 512 N.W.2d 894 Minn. 1994

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by