Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite McNiff v. State, Department of Public Welfare, 176 N.W.2d 888.

25 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Estate of: Mathew Joseph Tomczik, Deceased. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Welfare Dep’t, d 888, 891 (Minn. 1970) (citing In re Ordean’ s Will, 261 N.W.
In Re Appeal of Decision of Commissioner of Human Services 725 N.W.2d 114 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re Appeal of Decision of Commissioner of Human Services 725 N.W.2d 114 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
McNiff v. Olmsted County Welfare Dep’t, 287 Minn. 40, 44-45
In Re Horton 668 N.W.2d 208 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re Horton 668 N.W.2d 208 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re Stuart 646 N.W.2d 520 Minn. 2002
State v. Schleicher 646 N.W.2d 520 Minn. 2002
State v. Schleicher 646 N.W.2d 520 Minn. 2002
In McNiff v. Olmsted County Welfare Dept., 287 Minn. 40 , wé held that the term could not be interpreted to exclude a beneficiary’s interest in a testamentary trust in light of the purpose of the medical assistance program at issue, which was to provide medical care for those who could not pay for such care.
In Re Stuart 646 N.W.2d 520 Minn. 2002
In McNiff v. Olmsted County Welfare Dept ., 287 Minn. 40 , we held that the term could not be interpreted to exclude a beneficiary's interest in a testamentary trust in light of the purpose of the medical assistance program at issue, which was to provide medical care for those who could not pay for such care.
Morrison v. Doyle 582 N.W.2d 237 Minn. 1998
Morrison v. Doyle 582 N.W.2d 237 Minn. 1998
See In re Tuthill’s Will, 247 Minn. 122 , see also McNiff v. Olmsted County Welfare Dep’t. 287 Minn. 40
In Re Leona Carlisle Trust Created Under the Trust Agreement Dated February 9, 1985 498 N.W.2d 260 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
In Re Leona Carlisle Trust Created Under the Trust Agreement Dated February 9, 1985 498 N.W.2d 260 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
See McNiff v. Olmsted County Welfare Dep’t, 287 Minn. 40, 44-45
Evenson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 489 N.W.2d 256 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Evenson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 489 N.W.2d 256 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
185 , (court concluded that a trust beneficiary did not have an available interest in a discretionary trust, since without obtaining a court order, the beneficiary could not compel the trustee to make payments from the trust fund); cf. McNiff v. Olmsted County Welfare Dep’t, 287 Minn. 40 , (where a beneficiary of a trust may compel a trustee to disburse at least a portion of the trust assets for her benefit, the right sufficiently qualified the trust as a resource rendering the beneficiary ineli
In Re the Welfare of K.S. 427 N.W.2d 653 Minn. 1988
In Re the Welfare of K.S. 427 N.W.2d 653 Minn. 1988
See McNiff v. Olmsted County Welfare Dep’t, 287 Minn. 40
Matter of Welfare of Sayles 407 N.W.2d 414 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Matter of Welfare of Sayles 407 N.W.2d 414 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Finally, our holding is consistent with McNiff v. Olmsted County Welfare Department, 287 Minn. 40
Brooks v. RAMSEY CTY. COMM. HUMAN SERV. 405 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Brooks v. RAMSEY CTY. COMM. HUMAN SERV. 405 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See, e.g., McNiff v. Olmsted County Welfare Department, 287 Minn. 40 , (medical assistance applicant rendered ineligible due to excessive funds).
Ceryes v. St. Louis County Welfare Board 402 N.W.2d 209 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Ceryes v. St. Louis County Welfare Board 402 N.W.2d 209 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In McNiff v. Olmsted County Welfare Dept., 287 Minn. 40 , a recipient’s medical assistance grant was cancelled when she was named co-beneficiary of a discretionary trust.
Herman v. Ramsey County Community Human Services Department 373 N.W.2d 345 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Herman v. Ramsey County Community Human Services Department 373 N.W.2d 345 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In McNiff v. Olmsted County Welfare Department, 287 Minn. 40 , a similar argument was made involving a discretionary trust in which the applicant was a co-beneficiary.