Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Jacobs, 192 N.W.2d 816.

28 citing documents.

  • State v. Lopez 587 N.W.2d 26 Minn. 1998
  • State v. Lopez 587 N.W.2d 26 Minn. 1998
    See State v. Jacobs, 292 Minn. 41, 44 , ("[M]ere testimony concerning drinking was not in itself enough to raise the issue; the defendant must at least offer the drinking as an explanation of his actions.”) 6 .
  • Lundin v. State 430 N.W.2d 675 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • Lundin v. State 430 N.W.2d 675 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    State v. Jacobs, 292 Minn. 41, 44
  • State v. DeZeler 422 N.W.2d 32 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • State v. DeZeler 422 N.W.2d 32 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    State v. Jacobs, 292 Minn. 41, 44
  • Weaver v. State 408 N.W.2d 200 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Weaver v. State 408 N.W.2d 200 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    State v. Jacobs, 292 Minn. 41, 45
  • State v. Brant 407 N.W.2d 696 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Brant 407 N.W.2d 696 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    State v. Jacobs, 292 Minn. 41, 44 , State v. Hayes, 276 Minn. 384, 386
  • Lallier v. State 403 N.W.2d 880 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Lallier v. State 403 N.W.2d 880 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    State v. Jacobs, 292 Minn. 41
  • State v. Lopez 379 N.W.2d 633 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Lopez 379 N.W.2d 633 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    State v. Jacobs, 292 Minn. 41
  • State v. Garritsen 371 N.W.2d 251 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Garritsen 371 N.W.2d 251 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    State v. Jacobs, 292 Minn. 41
  • State v. Hemmings 371 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Hemmings 371 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    State v. Jacobs, 292 Minn. 41
  • Doughman v. State 351 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • Doughman v. State 351 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    State v. Jacobs, 292 Minn. 41
  • State v. Hill 256 N.W.2d 279 Minn. 1977
  • State v. Hill 256 N.W.2d 279 Minn. 1977
    See State v. Jacobs, 292 Minn. 41
  • State v. Rainey 226 N.W.2d 919 Minn. 1975
  • State v. Rainey 226 N.W.2d 919 Minn. 1975
    As we stated in State v. Jacobs, 292 Minn. 41 , before the intoxication defense comes into play, a defendant must offer the intoxication as an explanation of his actions.
  • State v. Hopkins 198 N.W.2d 542 Minn. 1972
  • State v. Hopkins 198 N.W.2d 542 Minn. 1972
    State v. Jacobs, 292 Minn. 41
  • Brown v. State 193 N.W.2d 613 Minn. 1972
  • Brown v. State 193 N.W.2d 613 Minn. 1972
    Kons v. Tahash, 281 Minn. 467, 474 , State v. Waldron, 273 Minn. 57 , and State v. Jacobs, 292 Minn. 41