Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Rochester Wood Specialties, Inc. v. Rions, 176 N.W.2d 548.
-
Severin M. Chmielewski, et al., Respondents,
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See Rochester Wood Specialties, -52 (Minn. 1970) (upholding JMOL because expert testimony positing that a fan ignited a fire, and that lacquer nearby could have ignited the fire, was “based on assumptions which were not established by the evidence”); d 589, 589-90 (Minn. 1975) (per curiam) (upholding JMOL when an
-
Mark D. Island, et al., Appellants,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
See Rochester Wood Specialties
-
Mark Kedrowski,
Minn. 2019
n.1 (Minn. 1983) (noting that the standard for judgment as a matter of law “suggests that the stage of the proceeding at which a motion for [judgment notwithstanding the verdict] is brought is an inappropriate time at which to effectuate a determination regarding the admissibility of evidence”); Rochester Wood Specialties, Inc. v. Rions , (agreeing with the district court that there was insufficient evidence of negligence at trial, while also stating that “[t]he expert opinions offered by plaint
-
Mark Kedrowski, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A post-verdict grant of JMOL is proper when an expert’s causation opinion “should not have been received because [it was] based on assumptions which were not established by the evidence.” Rochester Wood Specialties, Inc. v. Rions, 286 Minn. 503, 509
- Cokley v. City of Otsego 623 N.W.2d 625 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
-
Cokley v. City of Otsego
623 N.W.2d 625
Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Co. v. Brekke Fireplace Shoppe, Inc., (quoting Rochester Wood Specialties, Inc. v. Rions, 286 Minn. 503, 509 , ).
- Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Brekke Fireplace Shoppe, Inc. 495 N.W.2d 216 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
-
Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Brekke Fireplace Shoppe, Inc.
495 N.W.2d 216
Minn. Ct. App. 1993
In Rochester Wood Specialties, Inc. v. Rions, 286 Minn. 503, 509 , the Minnesota Supreme Court concluded that speculation and conjecture are insufficient to establish liability in a negligence action.
- Gorath v. Rockwell International, Inc. 441 N.W.2d 128 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
-
Gorath v. Rockwell International, Inc.
441 N.W.2d 128
Minn. Ct. App. 1989
at 614 ; see also Rochester Wood Specialties, Inc. v. Rions, 286 Minn. 503, 508-09
- Paripovich v. Hayden-Murphy Equipment Co. 358 N.W.2d 67 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Paripovich v. Hayden-Murphy Equipment Co.
358 N.W.2d 67
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
See Dalager v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc., (citing Rochester Wood Specialties, Inc. v. Rions, 286 Minn. 503 , ).
- Dahlbeck v. DICO Co., Inc. 355 N.W.2d 157 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Dahlbeck v. DICO Co., Inc.
355 N.W.2d 157
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Liability “must be based upon inferences reasonably supported by the evidence and not upon speculation based solely on the occurrence_” Rochester Wood Specialties, Inc. v. Rions, 286 Minn. 503, 509
- Dalager v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. 350 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Dalager v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.
350 N.W.2d 391
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Rochester Wood Specialties, Inc. v. Rions, 286 Minn. 503
- General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. Frito-Lay Co. 243 N.W.2d 726 Minn. 1976
-
General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. Frito-Lay Co.
243 N.W.2d 726
Minn. 1976
Respondents relied at trial on our decision in Rochester Wood Specialties, Inc. v. Rions, 286 Minn. 503 , and at oral argument directed our attention to our recent decision in Huseby v. Carlson, 306 Minn. 559
- Huseby v. Carlson 238 N.W.2d 589 Minn. 1975
-
Huseby v. Carlson
238 N.W.2d 589
Minn. 1975
This court held in Rochester Wood Specialties, Inc. v. Rions, 286 Minn. 503, 509 , : “* * * Liability for the fire must be based upon inferences reasonably supported by the evidence and not upon speculation based solely on the occurrence of the fire.
- Locoshonas v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance 177 N.W.2d 805 Minn. 1970
-
Locoshonas v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance
177 N.W.2d 805
Minn. 1970
In Rochester Wood Specialties, Inc. v. Rions, 286 Minn. 503 , 176 N. W. (2d) 548 , plaintiff sued for damages alleging negligence on the part of defendant in causing the fire.