Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Schwerm v. State, 181 N.W.2d 867.

27 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota v. Eric Dow Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
  • State of Minnesota v. Eric Dow Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    (holding nonfulfillment of a defendant’s “unwarranted hope” is not sufficient for plea withdrawal).
  • State of Minnesota v. Rufo Hamid Mumed Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    But a court should not set aside a guilty plea “merely because the accused has not achieved an unwarranted hope.”
  • Ignacio Olalde-Hernandez v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
  • Ignacio Olalde-Hernandez v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
    “[A] solemn plea of guilty should not be set aside merely because the accused has not achieved an unwarranted hope.” Schwerm v. State, 288 Minn. 488, 491
  • Butala v. State 664 N.W.2d 333 Minn. 2003
  • Butala v. State 664 N.W.2d 333 Minn. 2003
    Perkins, d at 689 (citing Schwerm v. State, 288 Minn. 488, 491 , (record made clear that defendant’s own counsel told him that prosecutor’s statement would not bind the court)).
  • State v. Wukawitz 662 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 2003
  • State v. Wukawitz 662 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 2003
    d at 687-88 ; -83 (Minn.1986); Schwerm v. State, 288 Minn. 488, 491
  • Perkins v. State 559 N.W.2d 678 Minn. 1997
  • Perkins v. State 559 N.W.2d 678 Minn. 1997
  • State v. Brown 406 N.W.2d 530 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Brown 406 N.W.2d 530 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    Schwerm v. State, 288 Minn. 488, 491
  • State v. Ford 397 N.W.2d 875 Minn. 1986
  • State v. Ford 397 N.W.2d 875 Minn. 1986
    1, any more than it was the basis for plea withdrawal in Schwerm v. State, 288 Minn. 488
  • State v. Robinson 388 N.W.2d 43 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Robinson 388 N.W.2d 43 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    Schwerm v. State, 288 Minn. 488, 491
  • State v. Andren 358 N.W.2d 428 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Andren 358 N.W.2d 428 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    Schwerm v. State, 288 Minn. 488, 491
  • Walton v. State 198 N.W.2d 286 Minn. 1972
  • Walton v. State 198 N.W.2d 286 Minn. 1972
    See, State v. Knight, 292 Minn. 419 , Schwerm v. State, 288 Minn. 488
  • Bush v. Arrowood 198 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 1972
  • Bush v. Arrowood 198 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 1972
    Paul Electrical Workers case, where this court said ( 288 Minn. 488 , ): “* * * In both situations there is merit in permitting beneficiaries to contest questionable use of trust funds without the prohibitive effect which would probably result if beneficiaries losing claims were always required to pay all fees and expenses.” In this case there is no danger of a prohib
  • State v. Loyd 190 N.W.2d 123 Minn. 1971
  • State v. Loyd 190 N.W.2d 123 Minn. 1971
    State v. Wolske, 280 Minn. 465 , 160 N. W. (2d) 146 ; Schwerm v. State, 288 Minn. 488 , 181 N. W. (2d) 867 .
  • Olness v. State 186 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1971
  • Olness v. State 186 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1971
    Schwerm v. State, 288 Minn. 488 , 181 N. W. (2d) 867 .