Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc., 189 N.W.2d 499.

76 citing documents.

Ming Le Lu, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Contrary to Sabri’s suggestion, Blehr does not support the broad rule that he proposes—that, “if the jury is required to determine liability and damages, then the damages are not readily ascertainable.” In Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc., the supreme court stated that “[a] dispute as to the amount of damages should not in all circumstances bar the accrual of interest on the damages.”
Joseph Roach, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
This principle is founded on the idea that “one who cannot ascertain the amount of damages fo r which he might be held liable cannot be expected to tender payment and thereb y stop the running of interest.” Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc.
Eric John Blehr, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Examples of unascertainable damages include the valuation of a partnership interest, the amount of damages for a trespass, Hogenson, d at 274, and personal injury or injury to reputation, Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc.
Nutripro Feeds, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Co. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc. , 297 Minn. 118, 132, 21 and 4 personal injury or injury to reputation, Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc. , 291 Minn. 513, 518
Soderbeck v. Center for Diagnostic Imaging, Inc. 793 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Soderbeck v. Center for Diagnostic Imaging, Inc. 793 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
(reviewing de novo construction of settlement agreement); Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc., 291 Minn. 513, 518-19 , (reviewing de novo award of interest as damages); (reviewing de novo construction of MinmStat.
Peterson v. BASF Corp. 657 N.W.2d 853 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Peterson v. BASF Corp. 657 N.W.2d 853 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc., 291 Minn. 513, 518 , (citations omitted).
Trapp v. Hancuh 587 N.W.2d 61 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Trapp v. Hancuh 587 N.W.2d 61 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
§ 549.09 (1996); Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc., 291 Minn. 513, 518
Pine Valley Meats, Inc. v. Canal Capital Corp. 566 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Pine Valley Meats, Inc. v. Canal Capital Corp. 566 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc., 291 Minn. 513, 518
Skifstrom v. City of Coon Rapids 524 N.W.2d 294 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Skifstrom v. City of Coon Rapids 524 N.W.2d 294 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
“where the damages were readily ascertainable by computation or reference to generally recognized standards such as market value and not where the amount of damages depended upon contingencies or upon jury discretion (as in actions for personal injury or injury to reputation).” Summit Court, (quoting Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc., 291 Minn. 513, 518 , ).
International Financial Services, Inc. v. Franz 515 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
International Financial Services, Inc. v. Franz 515 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc., 291 Minn. 513, 519
Lienhard v. State 431 N.W.2d 861 Minn. 1988
Lienhard v. State 431 N.W.2d 861 Minn. 1988
Potter v. Hartzell Propellor, Inc., 291 Minn. 513, 518
Higgins v. J.C. Penney Casualty Insurance Co. 413 N.W.2d 189 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Higgins v. J.C. Penney Casualty Insurance Co. 413 N.W.2d 189 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Summit Court, (quoting Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc., 291 Minn. 513, 518 , ); Polaris Industries v. Plastics, Inc.
In Re Estate of Renczykowski 409 N.W.2d 888 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re Estate of Renczykowski 409 N.W.2d 888 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc., 291 Minn. 513, 518 , Polaris Industries v. Plastics, Inc.
Hogs Unlimited v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. 401 N.W.2d 381 Minn. 1987
Hogs Unlimited v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. 401 N.W.2d 381 Minn. 1987
See Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc., 291 Minn. 513 , (no prejudgment interest where expert estimates of market value of an airplane varied; no objective standard for measuring market value).
Solid Gold Realty, Inc. v. Mondry 399 N.W.2d 681 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Solid Gold Realty, Inc. v. Mondry 399 N.W.2d 681 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Summit Court, d at 16 (emphasis supplied) (quoting Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc., 291 Minn. 513, 518 , (footnote omitted)); see also Josten’s, pet.
Hogs Unlimited v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. 390 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Hogs Unlimited v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. 390 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
erest where the claim is liquidated or, if unliquidated, “where the damages were readily ascertainable by computation or reference to generally recognized standards such as market value and not where the amount of damages depended upon contingencies or upon jury discretion.” Summit Court, (quoting Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc., 291 Minn. 513, 518 , ).
Glodek v. Rowinski 390 N.W.2d 477 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Glodek v. Rowinski 390 N.W.2d 477 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc., 291 Minn. 513, 518 , (fair market value is a standard by which a valuation is readily ascertainable).
Spinett, Inc. v. Peoples Natural Gas Co. 385 N.W.2d 834 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Spinett, Inc. v. Peoples Natural Gas Co. 385 N.W.2d 834 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc., 291 Minn. 513, 518 , , 504 *841 (1971); Moosbrugger v. McGraw-Edison Co., 284 Minn. 143, 160
Germann v. F.L. Smithe Co. 384 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Germann v. F.L. Smithe Co. 384 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc., 291 Minn. 513, 518
Regents of the University of Minnesota v. Medical Inc. 382 N.W.2d 201 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Regents of the University of Minnesota v. Medical Inc. 382 N.W.2d 201 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
ere the damages were readily ascertainable by computation or reference to generally recognized standards such as market value and not where the amount of damages depended upon contingencies or upon jury discretion (as in actions for personal injury or injury to reputation).” Summit Court, (quoting Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc., 291 Minn. 513, 518 , ).
Wilson v. Skogerboe 379 N.W.2d 696 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Wilson v. Skogerboe 379 N.W.2d 696 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc., 291 Minn. 513, 518
Tagtow v. Carlton Bloomington Dinner Theatre, Inc. 379 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Tagtow v. Carlton Bloomington Dinner Theatre, Inc. 379 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Prejudgment interest on an unliquidated claim is allowed only Where the damages were readily ascertainable by computation or reference to generally recognized standards such as market value and not where the amount of damages depended upon contingencies or upon jury discretion * * Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc., 291 Minn. 513, 518
Aid Insurance Co. v. Continental Western Insurance Co. 357 N.W.2d 403 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Aid Insurance Co. v. Continental Western Insurance Co. 357 N.W.2d 403 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc., 291 Minn. 513
San Francisco Real Estate Investors v. American National Bank & Trust Co. of St. Paul 359 N.W.2d 658 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
San Francisco Real Estate Investors v. American National Bank & Trust Co. of St. Paul 359 N.W.2d 658 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
e the damages were readily ascertainable by computation or reference to generally recognized standards such as market value and not where the amount of damages depended upon contingencies or upon jury discretion (as in actions for personal injury or injury to reputation).’ ” Summit Court, (quoting Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc., 291 Minn. 513, 518 , ).
Bilotta ex rel. Cutting v. Kelley Co. 358 N.W.2d 679 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Bilotta ex rel. Cutting v. Kelley Co. 358 N.W.2d 679 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
See, e.g., Summit Court, Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc., 291 Minn. 513, 518
Employers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Oakes Manufacturing Co. 356 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Employers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Oakes Manufacturing Co. 356 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc., 291 Minn. 513
Johnson v. Moberg 354 N.W.2d 613 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Sohns v. Pederson 354 N.W.2d 852 Minn. Ct. App. 1984

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by