Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State Ex Rel. Head v. Paulson, 188 N.W.2d 424.

113 citing documents.

Collins v. Minnesota School of Business, Inc. 636 N.W.2d 816 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
While we express no opinion on the amount of attorney fees to be awarded on remand, the district court should consider the factors set forth in State, by Head v. Paulson, 290 Minn. 371, 373 , (stating that attorney fee award under private-attorney-general statute is intended to eliminate financial barriers to the vindication of plaintiffs rights and to provide incentive for counsel to act as private attorney gene
Hoang Minh Ly v. Nystrom 615 N.W.2d 302 Minn. 2000
Hoang Minh Ly v. Nystrom 615 N.W.2d 302 Minn. 2000
The court held that the factors set forth in State v. Paulson, 290 Minn. 371, 373 , were appropriate considerations, specifically: "all relevant circumstances, including the time and labor required, the nature and difficulty of the responsibility assumed; the amount involved and the results obtained; the fees customarily charged for similar legal services; the exper
State v. Wiernasz 584 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1998
State v. Wiernasz 584 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1998
The "clearly erroneous” test for review of the findings of a trial judge is described in detail in State v. Paulson, 290 Minn. 371, 373
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Alpine Air Products, Inc. 490 N.W.2d 888 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Alpine Air Products, Inc. 490 N.W.2d 888 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Paulson, 290 Minn. 371, 373
Iowa Concrete Breaking Corp. v. Jewat Trucking, Inc. 444 N.W.2d 865 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Iowa Concrete Breaking Corp. v. Jewat Trucking, Inc. 444 N.W.2d 865 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Paulson, 290 Minn. 371, 373
Matter of Estate of Hoffbeck 415 N.W.2d 447 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Matter of Estate of Hoffbeck 415 N.W.2d 447 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
52.01; State v. Paulson, 290 Minn. 371, 373
Henning Nelson Construction Co. v. Fireman's Fund American Life Insurance Co. 383 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1986
Henning Nelson Construction Co. v. Fireman's Fund American Life Insurance Co. 383 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1986
52.01; (reviewing court will reverse a trial court’s findings only if, on review of the entire record, it is left with a firm and definite conviction that a mistake has been made); State v. Paulson, 290 Minn. 371, 373
In Re Condemnation Proceeding for the Wilmarth Line of the CU Project 380 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re Condemnation Proceeding for the Wilmarth Line of the CU Project 380 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Award of fees: Our scope of review is narrow here: This court, in the Paulson case [ 290 Minn. 371 , ], adopted the scope of review contained in Minn.R.Civ.P.
In Re Estate of Beecham 378 N.W.2d 800 Minn. 1985
In Re Estate of Beecham 378 N.W.2d 800 Minn. 1985
State v. Paulson, 290 Minn. 371
Yost v. Millhouse 373 N.W.2d 826 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Yost v. Millhouse 373 N.W.2d 826 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Paulson, 290 Minn. 371, 373 , (emphasis added).
Nelson v. Ninneman 373 N.W.2d 373 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Nelson v. Ninneman 373 N.W.2d 373 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Nelson argues that the court arbitrarily limited fees without consideration of the factors set out in State v. Paulson, 290 Minn. 371, 373
Sigurdson v. Isanti County 363 N.W.2d 476 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Sigurdson v. Isanti County 363 N.W.2d 476 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Paulson, 290 Minn. 371
Kamrath v. Suburban National Bank 363 N.W.2d 108 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Kamrath v. Suburban National Bank 363 N.W.2d 108 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
This court has said: The reasonableness of attorney’s fees “is a fact to be determined by the evidence submitted, the facts disclosed by the record of the proceedings, and the court’s own knowledge of the case.” State v. Paulson, 290 Minn. 371, 373
Katz & Lange, Ltd. v. Beugen 356 N.W.2d 733 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Katz & Lange, Ltd. v. Beugen 356 N.W.2d 733 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
II The reasonableness of attorney’s fees “is a question of fact to be determined by the evidence submitted, the facts disclosed by the record of the proceedings, and the court’s own knowledge of the case.” State v. Paulson, 290 Minn. 371, 373
Liess v. Lindemyer 354 N.W.2d 556 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Liess v. Lindemyer 354 N.W.2d 556 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
The court considered factors enumerated in State v. Paulson, 290 Minn. 371 , to determine the size of the award.
City of Minnetonka v. Carlson 298 N.W.2d 763 Minn. 1980
City of Minnetonka v. Carlson 298 N.W.2d 763 Minn. 1980
Head v. Paulson, 290 Minn. 371, 373 , (emphasis added in Carlson I).
City of Minnetonka v. Carlson 265 N.W.2d 205 Minn. 1978
City of Minnetonka v. Carlson 265 N.W.2d 205 Minn. 1978
In our view the award of fees for services up to the time condemnation was abandoned is governed by State, by Head v. Paulson, 290 Minn. 371
Shelby Mutual Insurance Co. v. Kleman 255 N.W.2d 231 Minn. 1977
Shelby Mutual Insurance Co. v. Kleman 255 N.W.2d 231 Minn. 1977
On the state of the record, we cannot' say with “firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” E. g., State, by Head, v. Paulson, 290 Minn. 371, 373
Bergstedt, Wahlberg, Berquist Associates, Inc. v. Rothchild 225 N.W.2d 261 Minn. 1975
Bergstedt, Wahlberg, Berquist Associates, Inc. v. Rothchild 225 N.W.2d 261 Minn. 1975
Furuseth v. Olson, 297 Minn. 491 , State, by Head, v. Paulson, 290 Minn. 371 , Rule 52.01, Rules of Civil Procedure.
Amundsen v. City of Minneapolis 218 N.W.2d 690 Minn. 1974
Amundsen v. City of Minneapolis 218 N.W.2d 690 Minn. 1974
State, by Head, v. Paulson, 290 Minn. 371
Hirt v. State 214 N.W.2d 778 Minn. 1974
Hirt v. State 214 N.W.2d 778 Minn. 1974
State, by Head, v. Paulson, 290 Minn. 371
Hagedorn v. Aid Association for Lutherans 211 N.W.2d 154 Minn. 1973
Hagedorn v. Aid Association for Lutherans 211 N.W.2d 154 Minn. 1973
State, by Head, v. Paulson, 290 Minn. 371, 373
Kosbau Bros. v. Ramy Seed Co. 208 N.W.2d 742 Minn. 1973
Kosbau Bros. v. Ramy Seed Co. 208 N.W.2d 742 Minn. 1973
Rule 52.01, Rules of Civil Procedure; State, by Head, v. Paulson, 290 Minn. 371
Nordby v. Peterson 207 N.W.2d 735 Minn. 1973
Nordby v. Peterson 207 N.W.2d 735 Minn. 1973
This standard permits the reviewing court to order a reversal “if, upon reviewing the entire evidence, we are left with a firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” State, by Head, v. Paulson, 290 Minn. 371, 373
Kittler & Hedelson v. Sheehan Properties, Inc. 203 N.W.2d 835 Minn. 1973
Kittler & Hedelson v. Sheehan Properties, Inc. 203 N.W.2d 835 Minn. 1973
O’Donnell v. McGee Trucks, Inc. 294 Minn. 110 , State, by Head, v. Paulson, 290 Minn. 371 , In re Living Trust Created by Atwood, 227 Minn. 495
Balbach v. Moe 200 N.W.2d 901 Minn. 1972

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by