Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State Ex Rel. Head v. Paulson, 188 N.W.2d 424.

113 citing documents.

Balbach v. Moe 200 N.W.2d 901 Minn. 1972
Co. 288 Minn. 294 , and State, by Head, v. Paulson, 290 Minn. 371 , for a discussion of our scope of review under the “clearly erroneous” language of Rule 52.01, Rules of Civil Procedure.
Metropolitan Sewer Board v. Thiss 200 N.W.2d 396 Minn. 1972
Metropolitan Sewer Board v. Thiss 200 N.W.2d 396 Minn. 1972
4 See, State, by Head, v. Paulson, 290 Minn. 371
In Re Probate Court, Hennepin County 198 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1972
Balafas v. Angelos 198 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1972
In Re Probate Court, Hennepin County 198 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1972
[3] See, also, State, by Head, v. Paulson, 290 Minn. 371 , State, by Burnquist, v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103
Balafas v. Angelos 198 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1972
See, also, State, by Head, v. Paulson, 290 Minn. 371 , State, by Burnquist, v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103
Moritz v. Town of Burns 193 N.W.2d 620 Minn. 1972
Moritz v. Town of Burns 193 N.W.2d 620 Minn. 1972
is “final.” 2 Rule 52.01, Rules of Civil Procedure, provides that findings made by a trial judge sitting without a jury “shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous.” Under this test, even though there be evidence to support the findings, we may order reversal “if, upon reviewing the entire evidence, we are left with a firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” State, by Head, v. Paulson, 290 Minn. 371, 373
Bissell v. Bissell 191 N.W.2d 425 Minn. 1971
Bissell v. Bissell 191 N.W.2d 425 Minn. 1971
Bule 52.01, Buies of Civil Procedure, provides that, upon review of findings made by a court sitting without a jury, the trial court’s findings “shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous.” State, by Head, v. Paulson, 290 Minn. 371
Independent School District No. 273 v. Gross 190 N.W.2d 651 Minn. 1971
Independent School District No. 273 v. Gross 190 N.W.2d 651 Minn. 1971
See, State, by Head, v. Paulson, 290 Minn. 371 , 188 N. W. (2d) 424 .