Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Northern Petrochemical Co. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc., 211 N.W.2d 159.

59 citing documents.

Distinctive Design Build, LLC v. Thomas Nelson, Installed Building Solutions II, LLC, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Distinctive Design Build, LLC v. Thomas Nelson, Installed Building Solutions II, LLC, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
N. Petrochemical Co. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc.
Nutripro Feeds, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Co. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc. , 297 Minn. 118, 132, 21 and 4 personal injury or injury to reputation, Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc. , 291 Minn. 513, 518
Randall Norman v. Crow Wing Cooperative Power & Light Company Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Randall Norman v. Crow Wing Cooperative Power & Light Company Minn. Ct. App. 2016
N. Petrochemical Co. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc., 297 Minn. 118, 125
Lee D. Weiss, Weiss Capital Real Estate Group, LLC v. Private Capital, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Lee D. Weiss, Weiss Capital Real Estate Group, LLC v. Private Capital, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“The law does not require mathematical precision in proof of loss, but only proof to a ‘reasonable, although not necessarily absolute, certainty.’” (Minn. 1977) (quoting N. Petrochemical Co. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc., 297 Minn. 118, 125, ).
Poppler v. Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Ass'n 834 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Poppler v. Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Ass'n 834 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
See, e.g., HydraMac, Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc., Northern Petrochemical Co. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc., 297 Minn. 118, 125
Mattson Ridge, LLC v. Clear Rock Title, LLP 824 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 2012
Mattson Ridge, LLC v. Clear Rock Title, LLP 824 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 2012
As we have recognized, lost profits are an appropriate measure of damages “when the anticipated profits can be prove[n] to a reasonable, although not necessarily absolute, certainty.” N. Petrochemical Co. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc., 297 Minn. 118, 125 , (requiring lost profits to be proven with “reasonable certainty” in the insurance context).
Schwickert, Inc. v. Winnebago Seniors, Ltd. 661 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Schwickert, Inc. v. Winnebago Seniors, Ltd. 661 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
See Stinson, d at 336 (holding that because the Rule 68 offer did not differentiate between types of damages, amount of prejudgment interest was indeterminable); see also N. Petrochemical Co. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc., 297 Minn. 118, 132 , (affirming denial of prejudgment interest where neither the amount nor the apportionment of damages was readily ascertainable).
Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co. 563 N.W.2d 724 Minn. 1997
Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co. 563 N.W.2d 724 Minn. 1997
Co. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc., 297 Minn. 118, 128 , ).
Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp. 450 N.W.2d 913 Minn. 1990
Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp. 450 N.W.2d 913 Minn. 1990
Co. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc., 297 Minn. 118, 125 , ).
Hughes v. Sinclair Marketing, Inc. 389 N.W.2d 194 Minn. 1986
Hughes v. Sinclair Marketing, Inc. 389 N.W.2d 194 Minn. 1986
Northern Petrochemical Co. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc., 297 Minn. 118, 125
Valley Farmers' Elevator v. Lindsay Bros. Co. 380 N.W.2d 874 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Valley Farmers' Elevator v. Lindsay Bros. Co. 380 N.W.2d 874 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See City of Eveleth v. Ruble, 302 Minn. 249 , Northern Petrochemical Co. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc., 297 Minn. 118
Germann v. F.L. Smithe Co. 384 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Germann v. F.L. Smithe Co. 384 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Northern Petrochemical Co. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc., 297 Minn. 118, 132
L.P. Medical Specialists, Ltd. v. St. Louis County 379 N.W.2d 104 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
L.P. Medical Specialists, Ltd. v. St. Louis County 379 N.W.2d 104 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
This is not a case such as Northern Petrochemical Co. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc., 297 Minn. 118, 132 , where both the amount of damages and the apportionment of damages was not readily ascertainable before trial.
Johnson v. Garages, Etc., Inc. 367 N.W.2d 85 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Johnson v. Garages, Etc., Inc. 367 N.W.2d 85 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Northern Petrochem Co. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc., 297 Minn. 118, 124
Fudally v. Ching Johnson Builders, Inc. 360 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Fudally v. Ching Johnson Builders, Inc. 360 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Asp v. O’Brien, (citing Northern Petrochemical Co. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc., 297 Minn. 118, 124 , ).
Bethesda Lutheran Church v. Twin City Construction Co. 356 N.W.2d 344 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Bethesda Lutheran Church v. Twin City Construction Co. 356 N.W.2d 344 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Northern Petrochemical Co. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc., 297 Minn. 118, 124
Johnson v. Moberg 354 N.W.2d 613 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Johnson v. Moberg 354 N.W.2d 613 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Co. v. Thorsen & Thorshor, Inc., 297 Minn. 118 , but in Integrity Mutual Ins.
Mike's Fixtures, Inc. v. Bombard's Access Floor System, Inc. 354 N.W.2d 837 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Mike's Fixtures, Inc. v. Bombard's Access Floor System, Inc. 354 N.W.2d 837 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Co. v. Thorson & Thorshov, Inc., 297 Minn. 118 , does not apply.
Summit Court, Inc. v. Northern States Power Co. 354 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 1984
Summit Court, Inc. v. Northern States Power Co. 354 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 1984
To support denial of prejudgment interest in this case, NSP relies on Northern Petrochemical Co. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc., 297 Minn. 118
Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto's, Inc. 336 N.W.2d 46 Minn. 1983
Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto's, Inc. 336 N.W.2d 46 Minn. 1983
See Northern Petrochemical Co. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc., 297 Minn. 118
Lesmeister v. Dilly 330 N.W.2d 95 Minn. 1983
Lesmeister v. Dilly 330 N.W.2d 95 Minn. 1983
Support for the existence of this cause of action derived from Northern Petrochem Co. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc., 297 Minn. 118 , which was somewhat imprecisely described as involving “negligent breaches of contractual obligations.” In Northern Petrochem, both the architects and the contractor improperly performed their contractual obligations to the owner.
In Re Commodore Hotel Fire & Explosion Cases 324 N.W.2d 245 Minn. 1982
In Re Commodore Hotel Fire & Explosion Cases 324 N.W.2d 245 Minn. 1982
10 The trial court relied on Northern Petrochemical Co. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc., 297 Minn. 118 , *250 where, in holding that the plaintiff there could recover excess operating costs encompassing extra employee, transportation, warehousing and other expenses incurred by plaintiff because of its inability to have use of a new building, we stated that such costs were “an element of lost prof
Northern Petrochemical Co. v. United States Fire Insurance Co. 277 N.W.2d 408 Minn. 1979
Northern Petrochemical Co. v. United States Fire Insurance Co. 277 N.W.2d 408 Minn. 1979
Northern Petrochemical Co. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc., 297 Minn. 118
Olson v. Rugloski 277 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 1979
Asp v. O'BRIEN 277 N.W.2d 382 Minn. 1979
Asp v. O'BRIEN 277 N.W.2d 382 Minn. 1979
Northern Petrochemical Co. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc., 297 Minn. 118, 124
Olson v. Rugloski 277 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 1979
See, Northern Petrochemical Co. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc., 297 Minn. 118, 125
Faust v. Parrott 270 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 1978

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by