Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Northern Petrochemical Co. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc., 211 N.W.2d 159.

59 citing documents.

Faust v. Parrott 270 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 1978
See, Northern Petrochemical Co. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc., 297 Minn. 118 , Willmar Gas Co. v. Duininck, 236 Minn. 499 , 5B Dunnell, Dig.
Parkside Mobile Estates v. Lee 270 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 1978
Parkside Mobile Estates v. Lee 270 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 1978
See, Northern Retro Chemical Co. v. Thorson & Thorsov, 297 Minn. 118
Duchene v. Wolstan 258 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 1977
Duchene v. Wolstan 258 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 1977
The law does not require mathematical precision in proof of loss but only proof to a “reasonable, although not necessarily absolute, certainty.” Northern Petrochemical Co. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc., 297 Minn. 118, 125
Leoni v. Bemis Co., Inc. 255 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1977
Leoni v. Bemis Co., Inc. 255 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1977
The law does not require mathematical precision in proof of loss, but only proof to a “reasonable, although not necessarily absolute, certainty.” Northern Petrochemical Co. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc., 297 Minn. 118, 125
City of Eveleth v. Ruble 225 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1974
City of Eveleth v. Ruble 225 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1974
substantial good faith effort to perform the contract but there are defects of such a nature that the contract has not been performed according to its terms which defects can be remedied without the destruction of a substantial part of the building, the owner is entitled to recover the cost of making the work conform to the contract.” In Northern Petrochemical Co. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc. 297 Minn. 118 , an action against an architect, a general contractor, and a structural engineer for d