Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bussard v. College of Saint Thomas, Inc., 200 N.W.2d 155.

57 citing documents.

Sandra Weise v. Alan M. Powell Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Sandra Weise v. Alan M. Powell Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Diversified Manufacturing Corporation, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Thomas, Inc ., (stating that a contract “must be read in light of the situation of the parties, the subject matter and purposes of the transaction, and like attendant circumstances”), did not involve a merger clause.
GGG, Incorporation, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Thomas, Inc., (permitting parol evidence to provide additional terms after finding that the parties “did not intend the document to be a complete and final statement of the whole transaction between them .” (quoting Phoenix Pub.
Jeremiah Akinnola, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Thomas, Inc. , 294 Minn. 215, 224
Leslie Davis v. Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Leslie Davis v. Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Thomas, Inc., 294 Minn. 215, 224
Anchor Bank, N. A. v. Matthew L. Gulbransen Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Anchor Bank, N. A. v. Matthew L. Gulbransen Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Thomas, Inc., 294 Minn. 5 215, 224, (citing Phoenix Publ’g Co. v. Riverside Clothing Co., 54 Minn. 205, 206, 55 N.W.
Randy Lundgren v. Diane Cash Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Randy Lundgren v. Diane Cash Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Thomas, Inc., 294 Minn. 215, 224, and has been recognized since 1893, when the supreme court stated: It is always competent to prove by parol [evidence] the existence of any separate oral agreement as to any matter on which the document is silent, and which is not inconsiste
Toyota-Lift of Minnesota, Inc. v. American Warehouse Systems, LLC, and third party v. Les Nielsen, third party 868 N.W.2d 689 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Toyota-Lift of Minnesota, Inc. v. American Warehouse Systems, LLC, and third party v. Les Nielsen, third party 868 N.W.2d 689 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Thomas, Inc., 294 Minn. 215, 224
Maday v. Grathwohl 805 N.W.2d 285 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Maday v. Grathwohl 805 N.W.2d 285 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Thomas, 294 Minn. 215, 224
Alpha Real Estate Co. of Rochester v. Delta Dental Plan of Minnesota 664 N.W.2d 303 Minn. 2003
Alpha Real Estate Co. of Rochester v. Delta Dental Plan of Minnesota 664 N.W.2d 303 Minn. 2003
Thomas, Inc., 294 Minn. 215, 224 , (citing Phoenix Publ’g Co. v. Riverside Clothing Co., 54 Minn. 205, 206 , 55 N.W.
Gunderson v. Alliance of Computer Professionals, Inc. 628 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Gunderson v. Alliance of Computer Professionals, Inc. 628 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Thomas, Inc., 294 Minn. 215, 223-24 , -61 (1972) (reversing summary judgment for employer where employee donated $350,000 in stock to employer on condition that he would continue as publisher of company employer had purchased).
Willis v. County of Sherburne 555 N.W.2d 277 Minn. 1996
Willis v. County of Sherburne 555 N.W.2d 277 Minn. 1996
Thomas, Inc., 294 Minn. 215, 228
Bib Audio-Video Products v. Herold Marketing Associates, Inc. 517 N.W.2d 68 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Bib Audio-Video Products v. Herold Marketing Associates, Inc. 517 N.W.2d 68 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Bussard v. College of Saint Thomas, Inc., 294 Minn. 215, 224-25
Gutierrez v. Red River Distributing, Inc. 523 N.W.2d 907 Minn. 1994
Gutierrez v. Red River Distributing, Inc. 523 N.W.2d 907 Minn. 1994
Thomas, Inc., 294 Minn. 215, 224
Michaelson v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. 474 N.W.2d 174 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Michaelson v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. 474 N.W.2d 174 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Thomas, 294 Minn. 215, 223
Knudsen v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 450 N.W.2d 131 Minn. 1990
Knudsen v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 450 N.W.2d 131 Minn. 1990
Thomas, Inc., 294 Minn. 215, 223 , (independent consideration beyond personal employment services can create a contract limiting discharge to good cause); Grouse v. Group Health Plan, Inc., (promissory estoppel principles used to imply good faith opportunity to perform duties; thus plaintiff
Bratton v. Menard, Inc. 438 N.W.2d 116 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Bratton v. Menard, Inc. 438 N.W.2d 116 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Thomas, Inc., 294 Minn. 215 , (plaintiff sold ownership interest in magazine to employer and received assurances of indefinite employment).
Knudsen v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 437 N.W.2d 733 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Knudsen v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 437 N.W.2d 733 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Thomas, Inc., 294 Minn. 215, 223-24
Petition of Minnesota Power & Light Co. 435 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Petition of Minnesota Power & Light Co. 435 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
537 (1935), if the alleged oral agreement is one that parties similarly situated would embody in the written agreement, then the written document is “complete.” Bussard v. College of Saint Thomas, Inc., 294 Minn. 215, 224-25 , -62 (1972) (citations omitted; footnote omitted).
Stromberg v. Smith 423 N.W.2d 107 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Stromberg v. Smith 423 N.W.2d 107 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Thomas, Inc., 294 Minn. 215, 225 , 200 N.W.
Phipps v. Clark Oil & Refining Corp. 396 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Phipps v. Clark Oil & Refining Corp. 396 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Thomas, Inc., 294 Minn. 215 , (material issue of fact existed as to whether parties had oral agreement of permanent employment under unique facts of case).
Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States 389 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 1986
Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States 389 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 1986
Thomas, Inc., 294 Minn. 215
Dumas v. Kessler & Maguire Funeral Home, Inc. 380 N.W.2d 544 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Dumas v. Kessler & Maguire Funeral Home, Inc. 380 N.W.2d 544 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Thomas, Inc., 294 Minn. 215 , reversed a summary judgment, determining that it was a question of fact whether the parties implicitly understood that the employee could continue as long as he wished.
Hruska v. Chandler Associates, Inc. 372 N.W.2d 709 Minn. 1985
Hruska v. Chandler Associates, Inc. 372 N.W.2d 709 Minn. 1985
Thomas, Inc., 294 Minn. 215, 224
Montgomery v. American Hoist & Derrick Co. 350 N.W.2d 405 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Montgomery v. American Hoist & Derrick Co. 350 N.W.2d 405 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Thomas, Inc., 294 Minn. 214, 215
Eklund v. Vincent Brass and Aluminum Co. 351 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Eklund v. Vincent Brass and Aluminum Co. 351 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Thomas, Inc., 294 Minn. 215
Hield v. Thyberg 347 N.W.2d 503 Minn. 1984