Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Kalvig, 209 N.W.2d 678.

31 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
For example, -81 (Minn. 1973), the supreme court concluded that the prosecutor did not have the discretion to charge the defendant under the general felony theft statute because a more specific statute, the welfare-fraud statute, controlled the defendant’s conduct.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Paul Joseph Welle, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See State v. Kalvig, 296 Minn. 395, 39 7-400, -81 (1973).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Kalvig, 296 Minn. 395, 397-400, -81 (1973).
Schatz v. Interfaith Care Center 811 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 2012
Schatz v. Interfaith Care Center 811 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 2012
See State v. Kalvig, 296 Minn. 395, 397-98
State v. Richmond 730 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Richmond 730 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
(citing State v. Kalvig, 296 Minn. 395, 398 , ), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State v. Craven 628 N.W.2d 632 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Craven 628 N.W.2d 632 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Kalvig, 296 Minn. 395, 398 , -44 (Minn.App.1986); see generally Minn.Stat.
State v. Danowit 497 N.W.2d 636 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Danowit 497 N.W.2d 636 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Danowit misplaces reliance on State v. Kalvig, 296 Minn. 395, 398 , d *641 678, 680 (1973) (affirming dismissal of felony theft charges on ground legislature intended welfare fraud to be a misdemeanor).
State v. Reese 446 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Reese 446 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Kalvig, 296 Minn. 395
State v. Lewandowski 443 N.W.2d 551 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Lewandowski 443 N.W.2d 551 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
1 (1988); State v. Kalvig, 296 Minn. 395, 401
Pahl v. Commissioner of Public Safety 398 N.W.2d 67 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Pahl v. Commissioner of Public Safety 398 N.W.2d 67 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
§ 645.26 (1984); see State v. Kalvig, 296 Minn. 395, 398
State v. Williams 396 N.W.2d 840 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Williams 396 N.W.2d 840 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Dismissal of the charge was predicated on State v. Kalvig, 296 Minn. 395
State v. Love 350 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 1984
State v. Love 350 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 1984
In support of this, he relies on State v. Kalvig, 296 Minn. 395 , and on an affidavit from one of the state senators who sponsored the bill.
State v. Chryst 320 N.W.2d 721 Minn. 1982
State v. Chryst 320 N.W.2d 721 Minn. 1982
They base this contention on our decision in State v. Kalvig, 296 Minn. 395
State v. Walker 319 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 1982
State v. Walker 319 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 1982
Appellant cites State v. Kalvig, 296 Minn. 395 , where we held that the legislature’s enactment of a law making welfare fraud a misdemeanor indicated an intent that the offense was of a type to be prosecuted as a misdemeanor, and not as a felony under the theft statute.
State v. Eaton 292 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1980
State v. Stith 292 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1980
State v. Eaton 292 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1980
Eaton argues .that, by analogy to State v. Kalvig, 296 Minn. 395 , he could be convicted only of securities fraud and not of the more general crime of theft.
State v. Stith 292 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1980
There is no merit to Stith’s contention that he could only be charged with securities fraud under the rule of State v. Kalvig, 296 Minn. 395