Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bernloehr v. Central Livestock Order Buying Co., 208 N.W.2d 753.

24 citing documents.

Cynthia Pitchford as Trustee for the Heirs and Next-of-Kin of D-Angelo Pitchford, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Buying Co. , (explaining that medical-expert testimony is required “[w]here a question involves obscure and abstruse medical factors” outside the knowledge of a reasonable lay person).
Admire Benga, et al., Individually and as Parents and Natural Guardians of Adriel Benga, a Minor, Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Michael Walker, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
d 753, 754 (Minn. 1973) (“Proof of a causal connection must be something more than merely consistent with the plaintiff’s theory of the case.”).
Judith Rygwall, as Trustee for the Heirs and Next of Kin of Amy Rygwall v. ACR Homes, Inc. … 6 N.W.3d 416 Minn. 2024
Judith Rygwall, as Trustee for the Heirs and Next of Kin of Amy Rygwall v. ACR Homes, Inc. … 6 N.W.3d 416 Minn. 2024
Judith Rygwall, as Trustee for the Heirs and Next of Kin of Amy Rygwall, deceased, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Jeanne Shellum, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Livestock Order Buying Co.
Mark Kedrowski, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Livestock Order Buying Co. , 296 Minn. 222, 225, 5 (1973) (noting that expert opinio n is required to prove causation if the issue is outside of the common knowledge of “the ordinary layman”).
Cheryl Kaufenberg v. The Winkley Company d/b/a Winkley Orthotics & Prosthetics Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Cheryl Kaufenberg v. The Winkley Company d/b/a Winkley Orthotics & Prosthetics Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Livestock Order Buying Co., 296 Minn. 222, 224
Blatz v. Allina Health System 622 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Blatz v. Allina Health System 622 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Bernloehr v. Central Livestock Order Buying Co., 296 Minn. 222, 225 , see Minn. R. Evid.
Kaiser-Bauer v. Mullan 609 N.W.2d 905 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Kaiser-Bauer v. Mullan 609 N.W.2d 905 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Bernloehr v. Central Livestock Order Buying Co., 296 Minn. 222, 224
Gross v. Victoria Station Farms, Inc. 578 N.W.2d 757 Minn. 1998
Gross v. Victoria Station Farms, Inc. 578 N.W.2d 757 Minn. 1998
■ Bernloehr v. Central Livestock Order Buying Co., 296 Minn. 222, 225
M.M.D. v. B.L.G. 467 N.W.2d 645 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Mmd v. Blg 467 N.W.2d 645 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Mmd v. Blg 467 N.W.2d 645 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Bernloehr v. Central Livestock Order Buying Co., 296 Minn. 222, 225 , see also, Prosser, supra, § 41, at 269.
M.M.D. v. B.L.G. 467 N.W.2d 645 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Expert testimony is required to establish causation only where the “question involves obscure and abétruse medical factors such that the ordinary layman cannot reasonably possess well-founded knowledge of the matter and could only indulge in speculation in making a finding.” Bernloehr v. Central Livestock Order Buying Co., 296 Minn. 222, 225 , see also, Prosser, supra, § 41, at 269.
Danielson v. Johnson 366 N.W.2d 309 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Danielson v. Johnson 366 N.W.2d 309 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Bernloehr v. Central Livestock Order Buying Co., 296 Minn. 222, 225
Sandhofer v. Abbott-Northwestern Hospital 283 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 1979
Sandhofer v. Abbott-Northwestern Hospital 283 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 1979
See, Shymanski v. Nash, 312 Minn. 304 , Bernloehr v. Central Livestock Order Buying Co., 296 Minn. 222

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by