Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Olson, 214 N.W.2d 777.

29 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Olson , 298 Minn. 551, 552 –53, (affirming conviction for assault with a dangerous weapon over defendant’s contention that he was too intoxicated to form the requisite intent).
State v. Torres 632 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 2001
State v. Torres 632 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 2001
E.g., State v. Olson, 298 Minn. 551, 552-53 , (per curiam) (concluding that a blood alcohol content of .29 approximately one hour after events of crime did not compel finding that defendant in an assault case could not possibly have intended his actions).
State v. Netland 535 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1995
State v. Netland 535 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1995
State v. Olson, 298 Minn. 551 , State v. Bongo, 278 Minn. 181
State v. Thunberg 492 N.W.2d 534 Minn. 1992
State v. Thunberg 492 N.W.2d 534 Minn. 1992
See State v. Olson, 298 Minn. 551, 552 , (holding that defendant’s blood alcohol content of .29 did not negate his ability to form the intent to commit assault with a dangerous weapon).
State v. Fortman 474 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Fortman 474 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Olson, 298 Minn. 551, 552
State v. Hale 453 N.W.2d 704 Minn. 1990
State v. Hale 453 N.W.2d 704 Minn. 1990
See, e.g., State v. Olson, 298 Minn. 551, 552 , State v. Bonga, 278 Minn. 181, 186
State v. Abraham 338 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 1983
State v. Abraham 338 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 1983
State v. Olson, 298 Minn. 551 , State v. Bonga, 278 Minn. 181
State v. Nurmi 336 N.W.2d 65 Minn. 1983
State v. Nurmi 336 N.W.2d 65 Minn. 1983
State v. Olson, 298 Minn. 551 , State v. Bonga, 278 Minn. 181
State v. Patch 329 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 1983
State v. Patch 329 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 1983
It is not clear whether defendant was entitled to have the defense of voluntary intoxication submitted with respect to the sex charge, but, in any event, we are satisfied that the evidence was not such as to compel the jury to find that defendant’s intoxication prevented him from forming any necessary specific intent, State v. Olson, 298 Minn. 551
State v. Tenhoff 322 N.W.2d 354 Minn. 1982
State v. Tenhoff 322 N.W.2d 354 Minn. 1982
State v. Olson, 298 Minn. 551 , State v. Bonga, 278 Minn. 181
State v. Case 312 N.W.2d 246 Minn. 1981
State v. Case 312 N.W.2d 246 Minn. 1981
State v. Olson, 298 Minn. 551 , State v. Bonga, 278 Minn. 181
State v. Kittleson 305 N.W.2d 787 Minn. 1981
State v. Kittleson 305 N.W.2d 787 Minn. 1981
State v. Olson, 298 Minn. 551 , State v. Bonga, 278 Minn. 181
State v. Clarken 260 N.W.2d 463 Minn. 1977
State v. Clarken 260 N.W.2d 463 Minn. 1977
1 See, State v. Olson, 298 Minn. 551
State v. DeFoe 241 N.W.2d 635 Minn. 1976
State v. DeFoe 241 N.W.2d 635 Minn. 1976
See, State v. Olson, 298 Minn. 551 , State v. Bonga, 278 Minn. 181
City of Minneapolis v. Altimus 238 N.W.2d 851 Minn. 1976
City of Minneapolis v. Altimus 238 N.W.2d 851 Minn. 1976
See, State v. Olson, 298 Minn. 551