Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Davis v. Davis, 210 N.W.2d 221.

36 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
League of Women Voters Minnesota v. Ritchie 819 N.W.2d 636 Minn. 2012
City of West St. Paul v. Krengel 748 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
City of West St. Paul v. Krengel 748 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
at 361 ; , 208 n. 2 (Minn.2001) (holding that challenge to one-year order for protection was not moot even though it had expired); Davis v. Davis, 297 Minn. 187 , 188 n. 1, , 223 n. 1 (1973) (holding that challenge to one-year residency requirement for divorce action was not moot even though plaintiff had since satisfied requirement).
Marriage of LaFreniere-Nietz v. Nietz 547 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Marriage of LaFreniere-Nietz v. Nietz 547 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Davis v. Davis, 297 Minn. 187, 192
Mitchell v. Steffen 504 N.W.2d 198 Minn. 1993
Mitchell v. Steffen 504 N.W.2d 198 Minn. 1993
at 1333 n. 21 (durational residence requirements for a license to hunt or fish or to practice a profession may not constitute a penalty on the exercise of the right to travel); Davis v. Davis, 297 Minn. 187, 192 , (durational residency requirement for bringing a divorce action valid, observing “not every penalty in interstate travel triggers the compelling-state-interest test”).
Mitchell v. Steffen 487 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Mitchell v. Steffen 487 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Equal Protection Appellant nevertheless argues that even if the statute penalizes the right to travel, “not every penalty on interstate travel triggers the compelling-state-interest test.” See Davis v. Davis, 297 Minn. 187, 192 , (one-year residency requirement for plaintiff in divorce action not violative of Equal Protection Clause).
Application of Crown CoCo, Inc. 458 N.W.2d 132 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Application of Crown CoCo, Inc. 458 N.W.2d 132 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
3249, 3254 , 87 L.Ed.2d 313 (1985); (citing Davis v. Davis, 297 Minn. 187, 189-90 , ).
Matter of Schmidt 443 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1989
Matter of Schmidt 443 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1989
Davis v. Davis, 297 Minn. 187, 188 , , 223 n. 1 (1973).
Villars v. Provo 440 N.W.2d 160 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Villars v. Provo 440 N.W.2d 160 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
See Davis v. Davis, 297 Minn. 187, 194 , (applied rational relation test to uphold residency requirement for divorce).
Marriage of Jones v. Jones 402 N.W.2d 146 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Jones v. Jones 402 N.W.2d 146 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Davis v. Davis, 297 Minn. 187, 195 , (quoting Bechtel v. Bechtel, 101 Minn. 511, 514 , 112 N.W.
State Ex Rel. Spannaus v. Hopf 323 N.W.2d 746 Minn. 1982
State Ex Rel. Spannaus v. Hopf 323 N.W.2d 746 Minn. 1982
Davis v. Davis, 297 Minn. 187, 189-90
State Ex Rel. Doe v. Madonna 295 N.W.2d 356 Minn. 1980
State Ex Rel. Doe v. Madonna 295 N.W.2d 356 Minn. 1980
This court in Davis v. Davis, 297 Minn. 187 , n. 1 (1973), considered the constitutionality of the Minnesota requirement of 1-year residency prior to filing a complaint for divorce.
Kossak v. Stalling 277 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 1979
Kossak v. Stalling 277 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 1979
See, Davis v. Davis, 297 Minn. 187
Hillstrom v. Commissioner of Revenue 270 N.W.2d 265 Minn. 1978
Hillstrom v. Commissioner of Revenue 270 N.W.2d 265 Minn. 1978
See, Davis v. Davis, 297 Minn. 187 , for a discussion of the importance of the right to travel.
Harris v. Commissioner of Revenue 257 N.W.2d 568 Minn. 1977
Harris v. Commissioner of Revenue 257 N.W.2d 568 Minn. 1977
We have previously held in Davis v. Davis, 297 Minn. 187 , that this penumbral right can ordinarily only be infringed when the state has a rational basis for doing so.
Price v. Amdal 256 N.W.2d 461 Minn. 1977
Price v. Amdal 256 N.W.2d 461 Minn. 1977
See, Davis v. Davis, 297 Minn. 187
Klaus v. Minnesota State Ethics Commission 244 N.W.2d 672 Minn. 1976
Klaus v. Minnesota State Ethics Commission 244 N.W.2d 672 Minn. 1976
Davis v. Davis, 297 Minn. 187
Davidner v. Davidner 232 N.W.2d 5 Minn. 1975
Davidner v. Davidner 232 N.W.2d 5 Minn. 1975
Davis v. Davis, 297 Minn. 187
Bodin v. City of St. Paul 227 N.W.2d 794 Minn. 1975
Bodin v. City of St. Paul 227 N.W.2d 794 Minn. 1975
5 See discussion in Davis v. Davis, 297 Minn. 187