DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Leinweber, 228 N.W.2d 120.

224 citing documents.

  • State v. Davis 656 N.W.2d 900 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • State v. Davis 656 N.W.2d 900 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
    *904 see also State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414, 421-22 , -26 (1975).
  • State v. Carney 649 N.W.2d 455 Minn. 2002
  • State v. Carney 649 N.W.2d 455 Minn. 2002
    State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414, 422 , -26 (1975).
  • State v. Sessions 621 N.W.2d 751 Minn. 2001
  • State v. Sessions 621 N.W.2d 751 Minn. 2001
    State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414, 422 , -26 (1975).
  • State v. Gustafson 610 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 2000
  • State v. Gustafson 610 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 2000
    Thus, while the trial court has the “ultimate responsibility to ensure that all essential instructions are given” under the law, see State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414 , 421/ that responsibility does not require the court to instruct the jury, sua sponte, on the affirmative defense of self-defense when it was not raised, argued, or requested.
  • State v. Shoen 598 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Shoen 598 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 1999
    Pursuant to the criteria set forth in State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414 , the court granted the motion.
  • State v. Nystrom 596 N.W.2d 256 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Nystrom 596 N.W.2d 256 Minn. 1999
    (citing State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414, 422 , -126 (Minn.1975)).
  • State v. Chambers 589 N.W.2d 466 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Chambers 589 N.W.2d 466 Minn. 1999
    See State v. Lein-weber, 303 Minn. 414
  • State v. Brocks 587 N.W.2d 37 Minn. 1998
  • State v. Brocks 587 N.W.2d 37 Minn. 1998
    (citing State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414, 422 , -26 (1975)).
  • State v. Dimmick 586 N.W.2d 127 Minn. 1998
  • State v. Dimmick 586 N.W.2d 127 Minn. 1998
    1(1) (1996) (a lesser-included offense is "a lesser degree of the same crime”); State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414, 422 , -26 (1975).
  • State v. Maykoski 583 N.W.2d 587 Minn. 1998
  • State v. Maykoski 583 N.W.2d 587 Minn. 1998
    State v. Lein-weber, 303 Minn. 414
  • State v. Buntrock 560 N.W.2d 383 Minn. 1997
  • State v. Buntrock 560 N.W.2d 383 Minn. 1997
    (citing State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414, 422 , -26 (1975)).
  • State v. Schreiber 558 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 1997
  • State v. Schreiber 558 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 1997
    State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414, 421
  • State v. Lory 559 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
  • State v. Lory 559 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
    State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414, 421 , (stating that every lesser degree of murder is an “included offense”); see Minn.Stat.
  • State v. Dukes 544 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 1996
  • State v. Atkins 543 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1996
  • State v. Atkins 543 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1996
    The other two alleged misstatements of the law on lesser-included offenses clearly pass muster under the test for lesser-included offenses established by this court in State v. Leinweber, 308 Minn. 414, 422 , -26 (1975).
  • State v. Dukes 544 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 1996
    State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414, 421-22 , -26 (1975); see Minn.Stat.
  • State v. Cole 542 N.W.2d 43 Minn. 1996
  • State v. Cole 542 N.W.2d 43 Minn. 1996
    § 609.04 (1994); State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414, 421
  • State v. Auchampach 540 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 1995
  • State v. Auchampach 540 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 1995
    State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414, 421
  • State v. Hackler 532 N.W.2d 559 Minn. 1995
  • State v. Hackler 532 N.W.2d 559 Minn. 1995
    -57 (Minn.1982); and State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414, 415, 421 , 125 (1975).
  • State v. Griffin 518 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1994
  • State v. Griffin 518 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1994
    The leading decision dealing with submission of lesser-included offenses is Justice Ro-gosheske’s opinion in State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414
  • State v. Shannon 514 N.W.2d 790 Minn. 1994
  • State v. Shannon 514 N.W.2d 790 Minn. 1994
    That implication, however, is directly contrary to what Justice Rogosheske said in the leading case of State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414, 417-19 , -24 (1975) (emphasis added): [0]ur reading of the record compels the conclusion that an instruction pursuant to defense counsel’s request on first-degree manslaughter should also have been submitted.
  • State v. Griffin 510 N.W.2d 277 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
  • State v. Griffin 510 N.W.2d 277 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
    See State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414, 420-22 , -26 (Minn.1975).
  • State v. Lee 491 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1992
  • State v. Lee 491 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1992
    (citing State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414, 422 , -26 (1975)).
  • State v. Shepherd 477 N.W.2d 512 Minn. 1991
  • State v. Shepherd 477 N.W.2d 512 Minn. 1991
    In State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414, 422 , -26 (Minn.1975), we set forth the test: is the evidence such as to reasonably support a verdict of guilty of the lesser offense and at the same time a verdict of not guilty of the greater offense?
  • State v. Angulo 471 N.W.2d 570 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • State v. Angulo 471 N.W.2d 570 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
    See State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414, 421 , (first-degree murder includes every lesser degree of homicide as an included offense).
  • State v. Kobow 466 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • State v. Kobow 466 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
    All cases which the parties cite address whether the trial court abused its discretion in (1) refusing to submit lesser-included charges to the jury at defense's request, see State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414 , or (2) submitting both the greater and the lesser offenses charged by *752 the prosecution where the evidence, if believed, established only the greater offense.