DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Leinweber, 228 N.W.2d 120.

224 citing documents.

  • State v. Kaul 457 N.W.2d 252 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • State v. Kaul 457 N.W.2d 252 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
    State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414, 422 , -26 (1975).
  • State v. Lewandowski 443 N.W.2d 551 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • State v. Lewandowski 443 N.W.2d 551 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
    See State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414, 420
  • State v. Hennum 428 N.W.2d 859 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • State v. Hennum 428 N.W.2d 859 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414, 422 , -26 (1975).
  • State v. Merrill 428 N.W.2d 361 Minn. 1988
  • State v. Merrill 428 N.W.2d 361 Minn. 1988
    In State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414, 422 , -26 (1975), the court established a two-part test for determining when a lesser included offense • must be submitted: (1) would the evidence reasonably support a conviction on the lesser offense and (2) would the evidence justify a finding of not guilty on the greater offense?
  • State v. Gurske 424 N.W.2d 300 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • State v. Gurske 424 N.W.2d 300 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    See State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414, 417-18
  • State v. Jurgens 424 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • State v. Jurgens 424 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    See State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414, 422 , (lesser-included offense need not be submitted if the evidence would not “reasonably support a conviction of the lesser degree and at the same time * * * a finding of not guilty of the greater offense.”).
  • State v. Edge 422 N.W.2d 315 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • State v. Edge 422 N.W.2d 315 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    303 Minn. 414, 422 , -26 (1975).
  • State v. Volk 421 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • State v. Volk 421 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    *365 Manslaughter In murder cases, the test for determining which, if any, lesser degrees of murder should be submitted is “whether the evidence would reasonably support a conviction of the lesser degree and at the same time is such that a finding of not guilty of the greater offense would be justified.” State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414, 422 , -26 (1975).
  • State v. Dick 419 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • State v. Dick 419 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    but see State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414, 421 , (“in a murder case it is preeminently the trial court’s duty in the exercise of its discretion to determine what lesser degrees of homicide to submit”).
  • State v. Stillday 417 N.W.2d 728 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • State v. Stillday 417 N.W.2d 728 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    In murder cases, the test for determining which, if any, lesser degrees should be submitted is “whether the evidence would reasonably support a conviction of the lesser degree and at the same time is such that a finding of not guilty of the greater offense would be justified.” State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414, 422 , -26 (1975).
  • State v. Ostlund 416 N.W.2d 755 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Ostlund 416 N.W.2d 755 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414, 422 , -126 (1975).
  • State v. Larsen 413 N.W.2d 584 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Larsen 413 N.W.2d 584 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    (citing State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414, 422 , -26 (1975)).
  • State v. Tuomi 396 N.W.2d 847 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Tuomi 396 N.W.2d 847 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414, 422 , -26 (1975).
  • State v. Mitjans 394 N.W.2d 221 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Mitjans 394 N.W.2d 221 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    1496 , 89 L.Ed.2d 897 (1986); State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414, 421
  • State v. Scheuble 392 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Scheuble 392 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    has been considered by the Minnesota Supreme Court recently in the following seven cases: and State v. Leinweber, 203 Minn. 414
  • State v. Lohmeier 390 N.W.2d 882 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Anderson 391 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Anderson 391 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414, 422 , -26 (1975).
  • State v. Lohmeier 390 N.W.2d 882 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414, 422 , , 125-26 *885 (1975).
  • Bellcourt v. State 390 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1986
  • Bellcourt v. State 390 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1986
    State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414, 422 , -26 (1975).
  • State v. Werman 388 N.W.2d 748 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Werman 388 N.W.2d 748 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    Koop, d at 494 (citing State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414 , ).
  • State v. Reynolds 386 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Reynolds 386 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414
  • State v. Roden 384 N.W.2d 456 Minn. 1986
  • State v. Roden 384 N.W.2d 456 Minn. 1986
    State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414, 422 , -26 (1975).
  • State v. Murphy 380 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 1986
  • State v. Koop 380 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 1986
  • State v. Murphy 380 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 1986
    State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414, 422 , -26 (1975).
  • State v. Koop 380 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 1986
    State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414
  • State v. Gerring 378 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Gerring 378 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    The Minnesota Supreme Court has recently stated the law regarding jury instructions on lesser included offenses: We determined in State v. Lienweber, 303 Minn. 414, 422 , -126 (1975) that the trial court is required to instruct the jury on a lesser offense if the offense is a lesser included offense of the crime charged, and if there is evidence which produces a rational basis for a verdict acquitting the defendant of the offense charged and convicting of the
  • State v. Yant 376 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Yant 376 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    See also State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414, 422 , -26 (1975).