DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Poppenhagen v. SORNSIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, 220 N.W.2d 281.

74 citing documents.

  • Hanson v. Roe 373 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Hanson v. Roe 373 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    See Jenson v. Touche Ross & Co., (quoting Poppenhagen v. Sornsin Construction Co., 300 Minn. 73, 79-80 , ).
  • Hansen Ex Rel. Hansen v. Smith 373 N.W.2d 349 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Hansen Ex Rel. Hansen v. Smith 373 N.W.2d 349 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    Poppenhagen v. Sorenson, 300 Minn. 73, 79 , Renne v. Gustafson, 292 Minn. 218, 223
  • Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto's, Inc. 336 N.W.2d 46 Minn. 1983
  • Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto's, Inc. 336 N.W.2d 46 Minn. 1983
    Poppenhagen v. Sornsin Construction Co., 300 Minn. 73, 81
  • Jenson v. Touche Ross & Co. 335 N.W.2d 720 Minn. 1983
  • Jenson v. Touche Ross & Co. 335 N.W.2d 720 Minn. 1983
    Further, as we stated in Poppenhagen v. Sornsin Construction Co., 300 Minn. 73 at 79-80 , at 286 (1974), in construing Minn.R.Civ.P.
  • Pine River State Bank v. Mettille 333 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 1983
  • Pine River State Bank v. Mettille 333 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 1983
    Poppenhagen v. Sornsin Construction Co., 300 Minn. 73, 79-80 , -86 (1974).
  • Application of Saxton 309 N.W.2d 298 Minn. 1981
  • Criticized Application of Saxton 309 N.W.2d 298 Minn. 1981
    However, the error is harmless since it does not appear that their testimony “might reasonably have changed the result if it had been admitted.” Poppenhagen v. Sornsin Construction Co., 300 Minn. 73, 80
  • Broughton v. Curran V. Nielsen Co. 287 N.W.2d 640 Minn. 1979
  • Broughton v. Curran V. Nielsen Co. 287 N.W.2d 640 Minn. 1979
    Co., 300 Minn. 73, 81-82
  • Woodrow v. Tobler 269 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 1978
  • Woodrow v. Tobler 269 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 1978
    Poppenhagen v. Sornsin Const. Co., 300 Minn. 73, 81 , Smith v. The Kahler Corp. Inc., 297 Minn. 272 , Hovey v. Wagoner, 287 Minn. 546 , Moosbrugger v. McGraw-Edison Co., 284 Minn. 143, 158 , Stall v. Christensen, 277 Minn. 71, 75 , Hammond
  • Weiby v. Wente 264 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1978
  • Weiby v. Wente 264 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1978
    First, such requested instructions may be refused if their substance is adequately contained in the general charge, Poppenhagen v. Sornsin Const. Co., 300 Minn. 73, 81 , Smith v. The Kahler Corp. Inc., 297 Minn. 272, 282
  • Cummins v. Rachner 257 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 1977
  • Cummins v. Rachner 257 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 1977
    See, Poppenhagen v. Sornsin Construction Co., 300 Minn. 73
  • Ferguson v. Benson 244 N.W.2d 116 Minn. 1976
  • Ferguson v. Benson 244 N.W.2d 116 Minn. 1976
    In Poppenhagen v. Sornsin Const. Co. 300 Minn. 73, 81 , we held that the admission of the manual is “purely discretionary with the trial court,” but indicated that “the manual does not have the force and effect of law, and thus, a violation of the requirements of the manual would not compel a finding of negligence as a matter of law” ( 3
  • Steinhaus v. Adamson 228 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 1975
  • Steinhaus v. Adamson 228 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 1975
    See, Poppenhagen v. Sorn-sin Const. Co. 300 Minn. 73