Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Poppenhagen v. SORNSIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, 220 N.W.2d 281.

74 citing documents.

In re the Guardianship of Suad Sharif. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Co., (“Clearly, [when] excluded evidence is merely repetitious of other evidence admitted at trial, no prejudicial error results.”).
Thaleaha McBee v. Team Industries, Inc. Minn. 2025
Thaleaha McBee v. Team Industries, Inc. Minn. 2025
Minn. 2025
Cathy J. Foy, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Chad Monson, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In addition, “a party is entitled to an instruction setting forth his theory of the case if there is evidence to support it and if it is in accordance with applicable law.” (quotation omitted).
Croix Holdings, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Co., (referencing exclusion of evidence at trial).
Bay Side Recycling Company LLC, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
of the U.S. , and the evidence in the case, Poppenhagen v. Sornsin Const. Co. , 86 ( Minn. 1974).
Cory L. Hendricksen, as Trustee for the Heirs and Next of Kin of Ashton Hendricksen, decedent, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Mark Kedrowski, Minn. 2019
Bisbee v. Ruppert , d 364, 368 (Minn. 1975); (“[W]here excluded evidence is merely repetitious of other evidence admitted at trial, no prejudicial error results.”).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: Q. S. M. and T. R. S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In the Matter of Krista Ann Dickenson and o/b/o Minor Children, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Co., 300 Minn. 73, 79 -80, ), review denied (Minn. Oct.
TORCHWOOD PROPERTIES, LLC v. McKinnon 784 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
TORCHWOOD PROPERTIES, LLC v. McKinnon 784 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Co., 300 Minn. 73, 79-80 , ), review denied (Minn. Oct.
Becker v. Mayo Foundation 737 N.W.2d 200 Minn. 2007
Becker v. Mayo Foundation 737 N.W.2d 200 Minn. 2007
Co., 300 Minn. 73, 79-80
Foust v. McFairland 698 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Foust v. McFairland 698 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Co., 300 Minn. 73, 79-80 , (providing that an error in admitting evidence is prejudicial “if there is a reasonable possibility that the verdict might have been more favorable to the defendant if the evidence had not been admitted”) (quotation omitted).
Shea v. Esensten 622 N.W.2d 130 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Shea v. Esensten 622 N.W.2d 130 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Poppenhagen v. Sornsin Const. Co., 300 Minn. 73, 79
C.J. Duffey Paper Co. v. Reger 588 N.W.2d 519 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
C.J. Duffey Paper Co. v. Reger 588 N.W.2d 519 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Co., 300 Minn., 73, 81 , Smith v. Kahler Corp., 297 Minn. 272, 281
Bermel v. Auge 574 N.W.2d 460 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Bermel v. Auge 574 N.W.2d 460 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Dornfeld v. Oberg 491 N.W.2d 297 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Dornfeld v. Oberg 491 N.W.2d 297 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Co., 300 Minn. 73, 79-80 , ).
Kirsebom v. Connelly 486 N.W.2d 172 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Kirsebom v. Connelly 486 N.W.2d 172 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Co., 300 Minn. 73, 81 , (quoting Dornack v. Barton Constr.
Hahn v. Tri-Line Farmers Co-Op 478 N.W.2d 515 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Hahn v. Tri-Line Farmers Co-Op 478 N.W.2d 515 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Co., 300 Minn. 73, 79-80 , ).
Behlke v. Conwed Corp. 474 N.W.2d 351 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Behlke v. Conwed Corp. 474 N.W.2d 351 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Co., 300 Minn. 73, 79-80
Alevizos v. METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COM'N 452 N.W.2d 492 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Alevizos v. METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COM'N 452 N.W.2d 492 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Poppenhagen v. Sornsin Construction Co., 300 Minn. 73, 79-80
Aitkin County Family Service Agency ex rel. Wiebrand v. Gangl 441 N.W.2d 814 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Aitkin County Family Service Agency ex rel. Wiebrand v. Gangl 441 N.W.2d 814 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
le we agree the verdict can be sustained through application of a broad standard of review on sufficiency of the evidence alone, it is clear that the issue of paternity is close at best, and the erroneous introduction of evidence on appellant’s November 23rd conduct “might have reasonably changed the result of the trial.” Jenson, d at 725 (quoting Poppenhagen v. Sornsin Construction Co., 300 Minn. 73, 79-80 , ).
Mervin v. Magney Construction Co. 416 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1987
Mervin v. Magney Construction Co. 416 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1987
Co., 300 Minn. 73, 81 , -86 (1974) (exclusion affirmed).
Maloney v. Ketter 408 N.W.2d 865 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Maloney v. Ketter 408 N.W.2d 865 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Jenson, d at 725 (quoting Poppenhagen v. Sornsin Construction Co., 300 Minn. 73, 79-80 , ).
Conroy v. Book Automation, Inc. 398 N.W.2d 657 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Conroy v. Book Automation, Inc. 398 N.W.2d 657 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Poppenhagen v. Sornsin Construction Co., 300 Minn. 73, 81
Johnson v. Engen 386 N.W.2d 269 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Johnson v. Engen 386 N.W.2d 269 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Poppenhagen v. Sornsin Construction Co., 300 Minn. 73, 79-80
Regents of the University of Minnesota v. Medical Inc. 382 N.W.2d 201 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Rakow v. Waterfall Inn & Supper Club, Inc. 381 N.W.2d 66 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Rakow v. Waterfall Inn & Supper Club, Inc. 381 N.W.2d 66 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(quoting Poppenhagen v. Sornsin Construction Co., 300 Minn. 73, 79-80 , ).
Regents of the University of Minnesota v. Medical Inc. 382 N.W.2d 201 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(citing Poppenhagen v. Sornsin Construction Co., 300 Minn. 73, 79-80 , ).
Ouellette Ex Rel. Ouellette v. Subak 379 N.W.2d 125 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Ouellette Ex Rel. Ouellette v. Subak 379 N.W.2d 125 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Lhotka v. Larson, 307 Minn. 121 , 125 n. 7, , 874 n. 7 (1976); Poppenhagen v. Sornsin Construction Co., 300 Minn. 73, 81