Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Becker v. Becker, 217 N.W.2d 849.

34 citing documents.

Nicholas David Wivinus, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
A contempt order is nonappealable if it is not a final order, but instead “is a conditional order directing punishment only if [the] defendant fails to purge himself of his contempt.”
State of Minnesota, by Jan Malcolm, Commissioner of Health, in her Official capacity, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
A contem pt order is not appealable if it “direct[s] punishment only if [a party] fails to purge himself of his contempt.”
In re the Custody of M. M. L. Nathan James Sands v. Sue Mae Lovick, Dakota County Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Custody of M. M. L. Nathan James Sands v. Sue Mae Lovick, Dakota County Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Becker v. Becker, 300 Minn. 512, 513
Marriage of Mahady v. Mahady 448 N.W.2d 888 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Mahady v. Mahady 448 N.W.2d 888 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
See Becker v. Becker, 300 Minn. 512, 513
Marriage of Rohrman v. Moore 423 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Rohrman v. Moore 423 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Becker v. Becker, 300 Minn. 512, 513 , , 499 n. 1 (Minn.Ct.App.1987).
Marriage of Digatono v. Digatono 414 N.W.2d 498 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Digatono v. Digatono 414 N.W.2d 498 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Becker v. Becker, 300 Minn. 512, 513 , , 657 n. 2 (Minn.Ct.App.1986).
In Re the Marriage of Larson 408 N.W.2d 612 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Marriage of Larson 408 N.W.2d 612 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Although a conditional contempt order is not appealable, Becker v. Becker, 300 Minn. 512, 513 , because we reverse the court’s order increasing child support, any subsequent proceeding to enforce the contempt order is now meaningless.
Time-Share Systems, Inc. v. Schmidt 397 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Time-Share Systems, Inc. v. Schmidt 397 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Becker v. Becker, 300 Minn. 512, 513
Marriage of Witeli v. Witeli 392 N.W.2d 756 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Witeli v. Witeli 392 N.W.2d 756 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Becker v. Becker, 300 Minn. 512, 513
Marriage of Kroeplin v. Haugen 390 N.W.2d 872 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Kroeplin v. Haugen 390 N.W.2d 872 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Becker v. Becker, 300 Minn. 512, 513
Marriage of Lundell v. Lundell 387 N.W.2d 654 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State, Department of Human Services v. Peterson 387 N.W.2d 474 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State, Department of Human Services v. Peterson 387 N.W.2d 474 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
ANALYSIS Our review of the trial court’s September 23 order is precluded by Becker v. Becker, 300 Minn. 512
Marriage of Lundell v. Lundell 387 N.W.2d 654 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-85 (Minn.1986); Becker v. Becker, 300 Minn. 512, 513
Marriage of Tell v. Tell 383 N.W.2d 678 Minn. 1986
Marriage of Tell v. Tell 383 N.W.2d 678 Minn. 1986
The court of appeals affirmed the trial court’s contempt finding, after holding that Becker v. Becker, 300 Minn. 512 , did not preclude Wilbern from appealing the finding because he presented an irrevocable letter of credit in the amount of the arrearages, which was approved by the trial court as a supersede-as bond.
Marriage of Stangel v. Stangel 366 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Stangel v. Stangel 366 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Becker v. Becker, 300 Minn. 512, 513
In Re the Marriage of Tell v. Tell 359 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re the Marriage of Tell v. Tell 359 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Becker v. Becker, 300 Minn. 512, 513 , the court held that when enforcement of a contempt order for failure to make child support payments is conditioned on the defendant’s failure to purge the contempt by complying with the order, the order is not final and is therefore not appealable.
In re the Welfare of G.S. 352 N.W.2d 511 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In re the Welfare of G.S. 352 N.W.2d 511 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Becker v. Becker, 300 Minn. 512
Shepard v. Shepard 352 N.W.2d 42 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Shepard v. Shepard 352 N.W.2d 42 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Becker v. Becker, 300 Minn. 512, 513 , (citations omitted).
Peterson v. Peterson 242 N.W.2d 103 Minn. 1976
Peterson v. Peterson 242 N.W.2d 103 Minn. 1976
Becker v. Becker, 300 Minn. 512

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by