Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Carpenter v. Mattison, 219 N.W.2d 625.

75 citing documents.

Aegis Insurance Services, LTD., and other interested insurers as subrogees of Northern States Power Co. and Southern Minnesota … Minn. Ct. App. 2020
16 For expert-witness fees, Minn. Stat. § 357.25 (2018) gives the district co urt discretion to allow “fees or compensation as may be just and reasonable.”
Waymouth Farms, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“On appeal, the evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the prevailing party and the verdict must be sustained if it is possible to do so on any reasonable theory of evidence.” -29 (Minn. 1974).
Soderberg v. Anderson 922 N.W.2d 200 Minn. 2019
Soderberg v. Anderson 922 N.W.2d 200 Minn. 2019
Daly v. McFarland , , 120-21 (Minn. 2012) (citing Carpenter v. Mattison , 300 Minn. 273 , , 629 (1974) ).
Dustin Ray George Dittmar v. George Andrew Karels Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Dustin Ray George Dittmar v. George Andrew Karels Minn. Ct. App. 2016
14 award of expert witness fees will be disturbed only in cases where abuse of discretion is apparent.” Carpenter v. Mattison, 300 Minn. 273, 281
Terry Boyd v. BNSF Railway Company 858 N.W.2d 797 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Terry Boyd v. BNSF Railway Company 858 N.W.2d 797 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“[A] discretionary award of expert witness fees will be disturbed only in cases where abuse of discretion is apparent.” Carpenter v. Mattison, 300 Minn. 273, 280
Daly v. McFarland 812 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 2012
Daly v. McFarland 812 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 2012
Carpenter v. Mattison, 300 Minn. 273, 277 , Olson , 299 Minn, at 44, d at 127-28 .
Lester Building Systems v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp. 761 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 2009
Lester Building Systems v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp. 761 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 2009
See Carpenter v. Mattison, 300 Minn. 273, 276, -29 (1974).
Olson v. Alexandria Independent School District 206 680 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Olson v. Alexandria Independent School District 206 680 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
(costs and disbursements in general); Carpenter v. Mattison, 300 Minn. 273, 280 , (expert-witness fees).
State v. Lopez-Solis 589 N.W.2d 290 Minn. 1999
State v. Lopez-Solis 589 N.W.2d 290 Minn. 1999
See Carpenter v. Mattison, 300 Minn. 273, 280
Pine Valley Meats, Inc. v. Canal Capital Corp. 566 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Pine Valley Meats, Inc. v. Canal Capital Corp. 566 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
A damage verdict may be disturbed only if it is “manifestly and palpably contrary to the evidence.” Stuempges v. Parke, Davis & Co., (quoting Carpenter v. Mattison, 300 Minn. 273, 276 , ).
Lubbers v. Anderson 524 N.W.2d 735 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Lubbers v. Anderson 524 N.W.2d 735 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Primary assumption of the risk does not apply to snowmobile driving because a “snowmobile, carefully operated, is no more hazardous than an automobile, train, or taxi.” Olson v. Hansen, 299 Minn. 39, 44 , see also Carpenter v. Mattison, 300 Minn. 273, 277
Robbinsdale Clinic, P.A. v. Pro-Life Action Ministries 515 N.W.2d 88 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Robbinsdale Clinic, P.A. v. Pro-Life Action Ministries 515 N.W.2d 88 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Carpenter v. Mattison, 300 Minn. 273, 277 , see also New York State Nat’l Org.
Matter of Boss 487 N.W.2d 256 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Matter of Boss 487 N.W.2d 256 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Carpenter v. Mattison, 300 Minn. 273, 280
Stinson v. Clark Equipment Co. 473 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Stinson v. Clark Equipment Co. 473 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Carpenter v. Mattison, 300 Minn. 273, 280
Bradley v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. 471 N.W.2d 670 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Casey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 464 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Casey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 464 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Its exercise of discretion under § 357.25 is expected to be based in part on “pretrial preparation required in order to give this testimony.” [Carpenter v. Mattison, 300 Minn. 273, 281 , ] (construing Minn.Stat.
Stucci Ex Rel. Tierney v. City of Saint Paul 403 N.W.2d 850 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Stucci Ex Rel. Tierney v. City of Saint Paul 403 N.W.2d 850 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Carpenter v. Mattison, 300 Minn. 273, 276 , -29 (1974).
Conroy v. Book Automation, Inc. 398 N.W.2d 657 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Conroy v. Book Automation, Inc. 398 N.W.2d 657 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Carpenter v. Mattison, 300 Minn. 273, 276 , -29 (1974).
Frankson v. Design Space International 394 N.W.2d 140 Minn. 1986
Frankson v. Design Space International 394 N.W.2d 140 Minn. 1986
A jury verdict will be set aside “only if it is ‘manifestly and palpably contrary to the evidence.’” Stuempges, d at 256 (quoting Carpenter v. Mattison, 300 Minn. 273, 276 , ).
Lundgren v. Fultz 385 N.W.2d 378 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Lundgren v. Fultz 385 N.W.2d 378 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Carpenter v. Mattison, 300 Minn. 273, 276 , -29 (1974).
Thompson v. Hill 366 N.W.2d 628 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Thompson v. Hill 366 N.W.2d 628 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Carpenter v. Mattison, 300 Minn. 273, 276 , -29 (1974).
Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States 361 N.W.2d 875 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States 361 N.W.2d 875 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
A jury finding will be set aside only if it is “manifestly and palpably contrary to the evidence.” Carpenter v. Mattison, 300 Minn. 273, 276
Mohwinkel v. City of North St. Paul 357 N.W.2d 174 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Mohwinkel v. City of North St. Paul 357 N.W.2d 174 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Carpenter v. Mattison, 300 Minn. 273, 280
Melina v. Chaplin 327 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1982
Melina v. Chaplin 327 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1982
Carpenter v. Mattison, 300 Minn. 273, 276
Johnson v. Farmers & Merchants State Bank of Balaton 320 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 1982
Johnson v. Farmers & Merchants State Bank of Balaton 320 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 1982
Carpenter v. Mattison, 300 Minn. 273 , Young v. Hansen, 296 Minn. 430
Stuempges v. Parke, Davis & Co. 297 N.W.2d 252 Minn. 1980
Stuempges v. Parke, Davis & Co. 297 N.W.2d 252 Minn. 1980
All testimony must be considered in the light most favorable to the prevailing party, Blasing v. P. R. L. Hardenbergh Co., 303 Minn. 41, 47 , : Krengel v. Midwest Automatic Photo, Inc., 295 Minn. 200, 204 , and a verdict will only be disturbed if it is “manifestly and palpably contrary to the evidence.” Carpenter v. Mattison, 300 Minn. 273, 276 , Young v. Hansen, 296 Minn. 430, 433
Larson Ex Rel. Larson v. Independent School District No. 314, Braham 289 N.W.2d 112 Minn. 1979