DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Caron, 218 N.W.2d 197.

327 citing documents.

  • State v. Jobe 486 N.W.2d 407 Minn. 1992
  • State v. Jobe 486 N.W.2d 407 Minn. 1992
    State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123, 126-27 , -200 (1974).
  • State v. Gerald 486 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
  • State v. Gerald 486 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
    State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123, 127
  • State v. Bright 471 N.W.2d 708 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • State v. Bright 471 N.W.2d 708 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
    State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123, 127-28 , (emphasis added) (citation omitted).
  • State v. Wilbur 445 N.W.2d 582 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • State v. Wilbur 445 N.W.2d 582 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
    See State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123, 128
  • State v. Boitnott 443 N.W.2d 527 Minn. 1989
  • State v. Boitnott 443 N.W.2d 527 Minn. 1989
    State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123, 128
  • State v. Tennin 437 N.W.2d 82 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • State v. Tennin 437 N.W.2d 82 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
    State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123, 127-28
  • State v. Moore 433 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • State v. Moore 433 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    References by the trial court and prosecutor to events occurring in “May” or “May, 1986” were not objected to by appellant and, additionally, were harmless because they were outweighed by more frequent references identifying the exact date of appellant’s alleged conduct as “May 8” or “May 8, 1986.” See State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123, 127-28
  • State v. Shoop 429 N.W.2d 259 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • State v. Shoop 429 N.W.2d 259 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    -83 (Minn.1985); State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123, 127
  • State v. Parker 417 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 1988
  • State v. Parker 417 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 1988
    State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123, 127
  • State v. Parker 412 N.W.2d 419 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Parker 412 N.W.2d 419 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    We conclude the prosecutor’s comment “likely played a substantial part in influencing the jury to convict.” State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123, 128
  • State v. Ulvestad 414 N.W.2d 737 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Ulvestad 414 N.W.2d 737 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123, 128
  • State v. Kingbird 412 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Kingbird 412 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    In cases involving serious misconduct, we require “certainty beyond a reasonable doubt that the misconduct was harmless before affirming.” State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123, 127
  • State v. Bonn 412 N.W.2d 28 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Bonn 412 N.W.2d 28 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123, 128
  • State v. Marshall 411 N.W.2d 276 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Marshall 411 N.W.2d 276 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123, 127
  • State v. Wilford 408 N.W.2d 577 Minn. 1987
  • State v. Wilford 408 N.W.2d 577 Minn. 1987
    State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123, 127-28
  • Nelson v. State 407 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Laughnan v. State 404 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Laughnan v. State 404 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    See, State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123, 127
  • State v. Schneider 402 N.W.2d 779 Minn. 1987
  • State v. Schneider 402 N.W.2d 779 Minn. 1987
    State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123
  • State v. Mathews 400 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Mathews 400 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    See State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123
  • State v. Gould 399 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Gould 399 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123, 127-28
  • Luoma v. City of Minneapolis 398 N.W.2d 650 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Luoma v. City of Minneapolis 398 N.W.2d 650 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    Any misconduct in closing argument was less serious than that set forth under the standards in State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123, 127-28
  • State v. Alexander 398 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Alexander 398 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123, 127
  • State v. Johnson 396 N.W.2d 906 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Johnson 396 N.W.2d 906 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    See State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123, 127
  • State v. Anderson 395 N.W.2d 83 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Anderson 395 N.W.2d 83 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    at 498 (quoting State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123, 127-128 , ).
  • State v. Sandberg 392 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Sandberg 392 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    11, 1985) (quoting State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123, 128 , ).
  • State v. Wahl 394 N.W.2d 536 Minn. Ct. App. 1986