DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Caron, 218 N.W.2d 197.

327 citing documents.

  • State v. Wahl 394 N.W.2d 536 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123, 128
  • State v. Whaley 389 N.W.2d 919 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Whaley 389 N.W.2d 919 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    at 927 (quoting State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123, 128
  • State v. Page 386 N.W.2d 330 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Page 386 N.W.2d 330 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123, 127
  • Adesiji v. State 384 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • Adesiji v. State 384 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    See State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123, 127-28
  • State v. Friend 385 N.W.2d 313 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Friend 385 N.W.2d 313 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    The standards for review of prosecutor misconduct were explained in State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123 , : The test of determining whether prosecu-torial misconduct was harmless depends partly upon the type of misconduct with which we are dealing.
  • State v. Race 383 N.W.2d 656 Minn. 1986
  • State v. Race 383 N.W.2d 656 Minn. 1986
    State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123, 127 , State v. White, 295 Minn. 217, 225 , State v. Bell, 294 Minn. 189, 192
  • State v. Hanson 382 N.W.2d 872 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Fitzgerald 382 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Fitzgerald 382 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    The Minnesota Supreme Court distinguished two types of prosecutorial misconduct in State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123
  • State v. Hanson 382 N.W.2d 872 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    See State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123, 127-28
  • State v. Moseng 379 N.W.2d 154 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Moseng 379 N.W.2d 154 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    See State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123, 127
  • State v. Irwin 379 N.W.2d 110 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Irwin 379 N.W.2d 110 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123, 127-28
  • State v. Streeter 377 N.W.2d 498 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Streeter 377 N.W.2d 498 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    In State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123 , the court said: The test of determining whether prosecu-torial misconduct was harmless depends partly upon the type of misconduct with which we are dealing.
  • State v. Harmening 376 N.W.2d 254 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Harmening 376 N.W.2d 254 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123
  • State v. Peterson 375 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Peterson 375 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    -17 (Minn.1984); State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123
  • State v. Sanders 376 N.W.2d 196 Minn. 1985
  • State v. Sanders 376 N.W.2d 196 Minn. 1985
    See State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123
  • State v. Danielski 374 N.W.2d 322 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Danielski 374 N.W.2d 322 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    See id., 300 Minn. 123, 128 , (“in cases involving less serious prosecutorial misconduct this court has applied the test of whether the misconduct likely played a substantial part in influencing the jury to convict.”).
  • State v. Mousel 373 N.W.2d 359 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Mousel 373 N.W.2d 359 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    Even if error was somehow committed it was harmless under the standards in State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123
  • State v. Trimble 371 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Trimble 371 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    as “an incorrect statement of the law * ⅜ * that presumption does not gradually disappear, but it does not disappear whatsoever unless and until a defendant’s guilt is proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” The prosecutor’s remarks, while improper, do not require a reversal, since they likely did not play a “substantial part in influencing the jury to convict,” the standard set out in State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123
  • State v. Walker 372 N.W.2d 743 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Walker 372 N.W.2d 743 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    See State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123, 128
  • State v. Stephani 369 N.W.2d 540 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Stephani 369 N.W.2d 540 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123, 128
  • State v. Taylor 365 N.W.2d 368 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Taylor 365 N.W.2d 368 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    However, this comment was brief, was properly cured by instructions, and was harmless error under the standards set out in State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123, 127-28
  • State v. Clark 365 N.W.2d 327 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Clark 365 N.W.2d 327 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    Under the standards set out in State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123, 127-28 , any error was harmless.
  • State v. Williams 363 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Williams 363 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    See State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123, 127-28
  • State v. Hodge 362 N.W.2d 347 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Hodge 362 N.W.2d 347 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123
  • State v. Pacholl 361 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Pacholl 361 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    Under the standards set out in State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123, 127-28 , the error was not prejudicial.
  • State v. Southard 360 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Southard 360 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    State v. Caron, 300 Minn. 123, 127
  • State v. Johnson 359 N.W.2d 698 Minn. Ct. App. 1984