Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Rathbun v. WT Grant Company, 219 N.W.2d 641.

162 citing documents.

In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Progressive Preferred Insurance Company, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
12 Finally, we note that, “if any doubt exists as to the existence of a genuine issue as to a material fact, the doubt must be resolved in favor of finding that the fact issue exists.”
Bruce Westman, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(stating that “the recovery of both interest and principal provides a remedy too harsh under the circumstances”); Katz & Lange, (citing this aspect of Rathbun).
Pedro Alonzo, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Pamela Maslowski, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Mark D. Island, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Kawaljit S. Bhatia, as Trustee for the next of kin of Ena M. Bhatia, deceased, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Patricia Klug, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Grant Co. , see also Otte v. Otte , (providing that a motion for amended findings “must be based upon the files, exhibits and minutes of the court, not upon newly discovered evidence which is not a part of the record”).
In the Marriage of: Deborah J. Schmitt, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Grant Co. , ), review denied (Minn. Apr.
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Grant Co. , (noting that there “are several statutory exceptions to this interest ceiling”).
In re the Marriage of: James Edward Cook, II, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Grant Co., 300 Minn. 223, 238, (quoting id.), review denied (Minn. Nov.
Senogles v. Carlson 902 N.W.2d 38 Minn. 2017
Senogles v. Carlson 902 N.W.2d 38 Minn. 2017
Grant Co., 300 Minn. 223 , see also Rochester City Lines, (holding that the evidence is viewed “in the light ¡most favorable to the nonmov-ing party” and all doubts are resolved against the moving party).
State v. Minnesota School of Business, Inc. 899 N.W.2d 467 Minn. 2017
State v. Minnesota School of Business, Inc. 899 N.W.2d 467 Minn. 2017
Grant Co., 300 Minn. 223 , , 647 n.3 (1974) (discussing exceptions to the general 8 percent interest cap, including “revolving charge accounts” under Minn. Stat. § 334.16 ).
Montemayor v. Sebright Products, Inc. 898 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 2017
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as certificate trustee on behalf of Bosco Credit II Trust Series 2010-1, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
While Minn. Stat. § 334.01 is the general interest statute for loans, there “are several statutory exceptions to this interest ceiling.” Rathbun v. W. T. Grant Co., 300 Minn. 223, 231
State of Minnesota v. Minnesota School of Business, Inc. d/b/a Minnesota School of Business 885 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Minnesota School of Business, Inc. d/b/a Minnesota School of Business 885 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Rathbun v. W. T. Grant Co., 300 Minn. 223, 230
Marriage of Zander v. Zander 720 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Marriage of Zander v. Zander 720 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Grant Co., 300 Minn. 223, 238
Anderson v. State, Department of Natural Resources 693 N.W.2d 181 Minn. 2005
Anderson v. State, Department of Natural Resources 693 N.W.2d 181 Minn. 2005
Grant Co., 300 Minn. 223, 229
Wistrom v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co. 636 N.W.2d 611 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Wistrom v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co. 636 N.W.2d 611 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Grant Co., 300 Minn. 223, 230
Goins v. West Group 635 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 2001
Goins v. West Group 635 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 2001
Grant Co., 300 Minn. 223, 229
Peterson v. BASF Corp. 618 N.W.2d 821 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Peterson v. BASF Corp. 618 N.W.2d 821 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Grant Co., 300 Minn. 223, 241-42 , ).
Smith v. Soo Line Railroad 617 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Smith v. Soo Line Railroad 617 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Grant Co., 300 Minn. 223, 230
Johnson v. Johnson 563 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Johnson v. Johnson 563 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Grant Co., 300 Minn. 223, 238
Barton v. Moore 558 N.W.2d 746 Minn. 1997
Barton v. Moore 558 N.W.2d 746 Minn. 1997
Grant Co., 300 Minn. 223, 230
Murphy v. Wood 545 N.W.2d 52 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Murphy v. Wood 545 N.W.2d 52 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Grant Co., 300 Minn. 223, 230
DLH, Inc. v. Russ 544 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Lubbers v. Anderson 539 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 1995
Lubbers v. Anderson 539 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 1995
Grant Co., 300 Minn. 223, 230
Wallin v. Rappaport 539 N.W.2d 4 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Wallin v. Rappaport 539 N.W.2d 4 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Grant Co., 300 Minn. 223, 230
Marriage of McGowan v. McGowan 532 N.W.2d 258 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Marriage of McGowan v. McGowan 532 N.W.2d 258 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Grant Co., 300 Minn. 223, 238
Trapp v. Hancuh 530 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Widmark v. Northrup King Co. 530 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Trapp v. Hancuh 530 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Grant Co., 300 Minn. 223, 227-28 , Wetsel v. Guaranteed Mortgage Co., 195 Minn. 509, 509 , 263 N.W.
Widmark v. Northrup King Co. 530 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Grant Co., 300 Minn. 223, 232-33 , (cautioning against any expansion of the time-price doctrine).
Independent School District No. 197 v. Accident & Casualty Insurance of Winterthur 525 N.W.2d 600 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Independent School District No. 197 v. Accident & Casualty Insurance of Winterthur 525 N.W.2d 600 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Grant Co., 300 Minn. 223, 230