Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re LaBelle's Trust, 223 N.W.2d 400.

28 citing documents.

In re the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Parties may, by stipulation, “ag ree to incur certain obligatio ns which the [district] court, acting under its statutory authority, is not empowered t o impose.” In re LaBelle’s Tr.
Leifur v. Leifur 820 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Leifur v. Leifur 820 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
LaBelle v. LaBelle, 302 Minn. 98, 111 , (stating “stipulations may waive parties’ statutory rights in dissolution cases”), review denied (Minn. Aug.
Lee v. Lee 749 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Lee v. Lee 749 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
See, e.g., LaBelle v. LaBelle, 302 Minn. 98, 115-16 , (allowing parties to stipulate to dissolution provision not required by law); (same), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Gatfield v. Gatfield 682 N.W.2d 632 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Gatfield v. Gatfield 682 N.W.2d 632 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
LaBelle v. LaBelle, 302 Minn. 98, 111 , (stating “stipulations may waive parties’ statutory rights in dissolution cases”), review denied (Minn. Aug.
Solomon v. Findley 808 P.2d 294 Ariz. 1991
Taylor v. Taylor 413 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Taylor v. Taylor 413 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Labelle v. Labette, 302 Minn. 98, 112 , -09 (1974) (although a court on its own motion cannot validly order support for adult children, defendant who agrees to support provisions is estopped from claiming that they are void).
Marriage of Thuftin v. Bush 396 N.W.2d 83 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Thuftin v. Bush 396 N.W.2d 83 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
LaBelle v. LaBelle, 302 Minn. 98, 115-16
Plath v. Plath 393 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Plath v. Plath 393 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In re LaBelle’s Trust, 302 Minn. 98, 111
Gulbranson v. Gulbranson 343 N.W.2d 715 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Gulbranson v. Gulbranson 343 N.W.2d 715 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
See Rule 52.02 of Minn.R.Civ.P.; In re LaBelle’s Trust, 302 Minn. 98
In re the Trusteeship Under the Last Will & Testament of Gold 342 N.W.2d 332 Minn. 1984
In re the Trusteeship Under the Last Will & Testament of Gold 342 N.W.2d 332 Minn. 1984
That argument was specifically rejected in Kirsch v. Kahn, 276 Minn. 294, 300 , quoted in LaBelle v. LaBelle, 302 Minn. 98, 118
Marriage of Peterson v. Peterson 319 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 1982
Marriage of Peterson v. Peterson 319 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 1982
See LaBelle v. LaBelle, 302 Minn. 98, 115
Sherlock v. Stillwater Clinic 260 N.W.2d 169 Minn. 1977
Sherlock v. Stillwater Clinic 260 N.W.2d 169 Minn. 1977
Cf. LaBelle v. LaBelle, 302 Minn. 98 , Mund v. Mund, 252 Minn. 442
Smith v. Smith 253 N.W.2d 143 Minn. 1977
Smith v. Smith 253 N.W.2d 143 Minn. 1977
LaBelle v. LaBelle, 302 Minn. 98
Edmondson v. Edmondson 226 N.W.2d 615 Minn. 1975
Edmondson v. Edmondson 226 N.W.2d 615 Minn. 1975
501.33; LaBelle v. LaBelle, 302 Minn. 98
Anderson v. Anderson 225 N.W.2d 837 Minn. 1975
Anderson v. Anderson 225 N.W.2d 837 Minn. 1975
LaBelle v. LaBelle, 302 Minn. 98 , Kaiser v. Kaiser, 290 Minn. 173 , Hellman v. Hellman, 250 Minn. 422 , Mark v. Mark, 248 Minn. 446