Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Eckert v. Eckert, 216 N.W.2d 837.

30 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
serves permanent spousal maintenance, the motion for permanent spousal maintenance must be made before the end of the temporary maintenance obligation.” The district court cited four cases that support respondent’s argument: (“Once maintenance payments end, the [district] court is without jurisdiction to modify maintenance.”); (“[T]here cannot be modification of something that has ceased to exist.”); d 285, 288-289 (Minn. App. 2007) (citing Loo and Eckert and holding that “the district court has
In re the Marriage of: Deborah Ann Barnett, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
A district court also loses authority to modify maintenance following the end of a mainte nance award, - 40 (Minn. 1974), quoted in Moore, d at 287- 89, or if it modifies maintenance to zero and does not expressly reserve authority to review that decision in the future
In re the Marriage of: Minn. 2022
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen Marie Tiedke, nka Kathleen Marie Freitag, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A17-1687 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Eckert v. Eckert , 299 Minn. 120, 124
Christine Diane Eyal, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See, (“Once maintenance payments end, the court is without jurisdiction to modify maintenance.”); Eckert v. Eckert, 299 Minn. 120, 125, d 837, 840 (1974) (“[W]here the decree does not specifically reserve jurisdiction of the issue of alimony for determination at a later date, no such jurisdiction can later be claimed.” (quotation omitted)); (“[W]here there is no existing maintena
In re the Marriage of: Stephanie Kay Nelson v. Steven John Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Stephanie Kay Nelson v. Steven John Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Eckert v. Eckert, 299 Minn. 120, 125
In re the Marriage of: Martha Jean Abbott v. James William Abbott Ladner Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Martha Jean Abbott v. James William Abbott Ladner Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Eckert v. Eckert, 299 Minn. 120, 125
Moore v. Moore 734 N.W.2d 285 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Moore v. Moore 734 N.W.2d 285 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
iction to modify maintenance”); (Coyne, J., dissenting) (stating that “it is well settled that where there is neither an award of maintenance nor a reservation in the decree of jurisdiction of the issue of maintenance for later determination pursuant to section 518.55, the district court cannot thereafter award maintenance” (citing Eckert v. Eckert, 299 Minn. 120, 123 , )); Eckert , 299 Minn, at 125, d at 840 (stating “that there cannot be modification of something that has ceased to exist”).
Santillan v. Martine 560 N.W.2d 749 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Santillan v. Martine 560 N.W.2d 749 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
See Eckert v. Eckert, 299 Minn. 120, 124, (holding court may not renew maintenance after end of original term); see also Cher-gosky v. Crosstown Bell, Inc., (avoiding interpretation that would render provision meaningless).
Loo v. Loo 520 N.W.2d 740 Minn. 1994
Loo v. Loo 520 N.W.2d 740 Minn. 1994
Eckert v. Eckert, 299 Minn. 120
Marriage of Keating v. Keating 444 N.W.2d 605 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Keating v. Keating 444 N.W.2d 605 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
See Eckert v. Eckert, 299 Minn. 120, 126-27 , and therefore the parties’ stipulation must have been intended to do more than merely waive the right to maintenance after August 1989.
Berens v. Berens 443 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Berens v. Berens 443 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
See Eckert v. Eckert, 299 Minn. 120, 124
Marriage of Karon v. Karon 435 N.W.2d 501 Minn. 1989
Marriage of Karon v. Karon 435 N.W.2d 501 Minn. 1989
See Eckert v. Eckert, 299 Minn. 120, 124
Marriage of Diedrich v. Diedrich 424 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Diedrich v. Diedrich 424 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Eckert v. Eckert, 299 Minn. 120, 123
Marriage of Karon v. Karon 417 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Karon v. Karon 417 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
In Eckert v. Eckert, 299 Minn. 120 , 216 N.W.
Marriage of Plante v. Plante 358 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Plante v. Plante 358 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
The Minnesota Supreme Court • considered a limited maintenance award similar to the Plante provision in Eckert v. Eckert, 299 Minn. 120
Berger v. Berger 242 N.W.2d 836 Minn. 1976
Berger v. Berger 242 N.W.2d 836 Minn. 1976
Eckert v. Eckert, 299 Minn. 120