Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Engelrup v. Potter, 224 N.W.2d 484.

33 citing documents.

In re the Matter of: Minn. 2021
Although a frivolous claim will not suffice, id., we have “followed [a] policy of encouraging all legitimate interventions.” Costley, d at 28 ( Avery v. Campbell , ).
Jerald Hammann v. Wells Fargo Bank, N. A., and Wells Fargo Bank N. A. v. Jeffrey Robert Busch, … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Jerald Hammann v. Wells Fargo Bank, N. A., and Wells Fargo Bank N. A. v. Jeffrey Robert Busch, … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Engelrup v. Potter, 302 Minn. 157, 165
Richard J. Hartfiel v. Raymond Wilburn Allison, T. J. Potter Trucking, Inc., Westfield Insurance Company, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Richard J. Hartfiel v. Raymond Wilburn Allison, T. J. Potter Trucking, Inc., Westfield Insurance Company, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Rule 24—that of encouraging all legitimate interventions—requires a liberal application of the rule.” Engelrup v. Potter, 302 Minn. 157, 166
In Re the Petition of Crablex, Inc. 762 N.W.2d 247 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re the Petition of Crablex, Inc. 762 N.W.2d 247 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
(stating that, although posttrial motions to intervene are not viewed favorably, they are not prohibited); Engelrup v. Potter, 302 Minn. 157, 165-66 , -89 (1974) (noting that timeliness is determined on case-by-case basis and depends in part on whether existing parties will be prejudiced).
Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Rhode Island v. Flam 509 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Rhode Island v. Flam 509 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Engelrup v. Potter, 302 Minn. 157, 166
BE & K Construction Co. v. Peterson 464 N.W.2d 756 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
BE & K Construction Co. v. Peterson 464 N.W.2d 756 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
See Engelrup v. Potter, 302 Minn. 157, 166
Husfeldt v. Willmsen 434 N.W.2d 480 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Husfeldt v. Willmsen 434 N.W.2d 480 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Engelrup v. Potter, 302 Minn. 157
Gruman v. Hendrickson 416 N.W.2d 497 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Gruman v. Hendrickson 416 N.W.2d 497 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Engelrup v. Potter, 302 Minn. 157, 166
Erickson v. Bennett 409 N.W.2d 884 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Erickson v. Bennett 409 N.W.2d 884 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Engelrup v. Potter, 302 Minn. 157, 166
Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Schumacher 392 N.W.2d 197 Minn. 1986
Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Schumacher 392 N.W.2d 197 Minn. 1986
See, e.g., SST, Engelrup v. Potter, 302 Minn. 157, 165
Koski v. Chicago & Northwestern Transportation Co. 386 N.W.2d 282 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Koski v. Chicago & Northwestern Transportation Co. 386 N.W.2d 282 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Norman, d at 675 (citing Engelrup v. Potter, 302 Minn. 157, 159 , -86 (1974)).
Norman v. Refsland 383 N.W.2d 673 Minn. 1986
Norman v. Refsland 383 N.W.2d 673 Minn. 1986
See Engelrup v. Potter, 302 Minn. 157, 159 , -86 (1974); Thibault v. Bostrom, 270 Minn. 511 , 512 n. 1, , 310 n. 1 (1965).
Norman v. Refsland 370 N.W.2d 488 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Norman v. Refsland 370 N.W.2d 488 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See Engelrup v. Potter, 302 Minn. 157, 159
Omegon, Inc. v. City of Minnetonka 346 N.W.2d 684 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Omegon, Inc. v. City of Minnetonka 346 N.W.2d 684 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Engelrup v. Potter, 302 Minn. 157, 165
Miller v. Astleford Equipment Co., Inc. 332 N.W.2d 653 Minn. 1983
Miller v. Astleford Equipment Co., Inc. 332 N.W.2d 653 Minn. 1983
In Engelrup v. Potter, 302 Minn. 157 , we held that a right of subrogation was a sufficient interest for purposes of Minn.R.Civ.P.
Costley v. Caromin House, Inc. 313 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 1981
Costley v. Caromin House, Inc. 313 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 1981
Engelrup v. Potter, 302 Minn. 157, 166 , Avery v. Campbell, 279 Minn. 383, 389
SST, INC. v. City of Minneapolis 288 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 1979
SST, INC. v. City of Minneapolis 288 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 1979
Engelrup v. Potter, 302 Minn. 157, 165