Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Sullivan v. F. D. Chapman Construction Co., 231 N.W.2d 87.
- Jill Marie Kalisch, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-
Winston T. Tan, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Chapman Const r. Co., 304 Minn. 334, 336
- Patrick Exner v. Minneapolis Public Schools, Special School District No. 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- Patrick Exner v. Minneapolis Public Schools, Special School District No. 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- Roxanne J. Soderholm v. Olivia Forar Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
Roxanne J. Soderholm v. Olivia Forar
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Co., 304 Minn. 334, 336, ).
- Lee D. Weiss, Weiss Capital Real Estate Group, LLC v. Private Capital, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
Lee D. Weiss, Weiss Capital Real Estate Group, LLC v. Private Capital, LLC
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Co., 304 Minn. 334, 336, ); aff’d (Minn. Jul.
- Moore v. Hoff 821 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
-
Moore v. Hoff
821 N.W.2d 591
Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Co., 304 Minn. 334, 336 , ).
- Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. v. Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd. 711 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 2006
- Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. v. Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd. 711 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 2006
- Alderman's Inc. v. Shanks 515 N.W.2d 97 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-
Alderman's Inc. v. Shanks
515 N.W.2d 97
Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Co., 804 Minn. 384 , 336, ).
- M.W. Ettinger Transfer & Leasing Co. v. Schaper Manufacturing, Inc. 494 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 1992
- M.W. Ettinger Transfer & Leasing Co. v. Schaper Manufacturing, Inc. 494 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 1992
- Beniek v. Textron, Inc. 479 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- Beniek v. Textron, Inc. 479 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- Amoco Oil Co. v. Jones 467 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Amoco Oil Co. v. Jones 467 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Computer Tool & Engineering, Inc. v. Northern States Power Co. 453 N.W.2d 569 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
-
Computer Tool & Engineering, Inc. v. Northern States Power Co.
453 N.W.2d 569
Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Chapman Construction Co., 304 Minn. 334, 336 , ).
- Goodwin v. Legionville School Safety Patrol Training Center, Inc. 422 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-
Goodwin v. Legionville School Safety Patrol Training Center, Inc.
422 N.W.2d 46
Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Chapman Construction Co., 304 Minn. 334, 336
- Balder v. Haley 390 N.W.2d 855 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Balder v. Haley
390 N.W.2d 855
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Chapman Construction Co., 304 Minn. 334, 336-38 , -90 (1975) (affirming directed verdict on negligence in construction of a sewer project, notwithstanding some evidence for plaintiff).
- Benson v. Rostad 384 N.W.2d 190 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Benson v. Rostad
384 N.W.2d 190
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Chapman Construction Co., 304 Minn. 334, 336 , ).
- Peterson v. Little-Giant Glencoe Portable Elevator Division of Dynamics Corp. of America 366 N.W.2d 111 Minn. 1985
-
Peterson v. Little-Giant Glencoe Portable Elevator Division of Dynamics Corp. of America
366 N.W.2d 111
Minn. 1985
Co., 304 Minn. 334, 336 , ).
- Independent School District No. 14 v. AMPRO Corp. 361 N.W.2d 138 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Independent School District No. 14 v. AMPRO Corp.
361 N.W.2d 138
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Chapman Construction Co., 304 Minn. 334, 336
- Raddatz v. Northland Development Co. of Minneapolis 352 N.W.2d 474 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Raddatz v. Northland Development Co. of Minneapolis
352 N.W.2d 474
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Chapman Const., 304 Minn. 334, 336 , (emphasis added).
- Alholm v. Wilt 348 N.W.2d 106 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Alholm v. Wilt
348 N.W.2d 106
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Chapman Const. Co., 304 Minn. 334
- Nemanic v. Gopher Heating & Sheet Metal, Inc. 337 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 1983
-
Nemanic v. Gopher Heating & Sheet Metal, Inc.
337 N.W.2d 667
Minn. 1983
Chapman Construction Co., 304 Minn. 334, 336
- Reinhardt v. Colton 337 N.W.2d 88 Minn. 1983
-
Reinhardt v. Colton
337 N.W.2d 88
Minn. 1983
Chapman Construction Co., 304 Minn. 334, 336 , (footnote omitted).
- Peterson v. Sorlien 299 N.W.2d 123 Minn. 1980
-
Peterson v. Sorlien
299 N.W.2d 123
Minn. 1980
& Associates, Inc. v. F. D. Chapman Construction Co., 304 Minn. 334 , we find the evidence against Paul Sorlien insufficient to present a question of fact for the jury to decide, and accordingly, uphold the directed verdict of the trial court.
- Midland National Bank of Minneapolis v. Perranoski 299 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 1980
-
Midland National Bank of Minneapolis v. Perranoski
299 N.W.2d 404
Minn. 1980
J. N. Sullivan & Associates, Inc. v. F. D. Chapman Construction Co., 304 Minn. 334, 336
- Walton v. Jones 286 N.W.2d 710 Minn. 1979
-
Walton v. Jones
286 N.W.2d 710
Minn. 1979
In J. N. Sullivan & Assoc, v. F. D. Chapman Const. Co., 304 Minn. 334 , we stated: It is well settled that a motion for a directed verdict pursuant to Rule 50, Rules of Civil Procedure, presents only a question of law for the trial court regarding the sufficiency of the evidence to present a fact question for the jury to decide.
- Northwestern State Bank of Luverne v. Gangestad 289 N.W.2d 449 Minn. 1979
-
Northwestern State Bank of Luverne v. Gangestad
289 N.W.2d 449
Minn. 1979
J. N. Sullivan & Associates, Inc. v. F. D. Chapman Construction Co., 304 Minn. 334
- National Pool Builders, Inc. v. Summit National Bank 281 N.W.2d 181 Minn. 1979
-
National Pool Builders, Inc. v. Summit National Bank
281 N.W.2d 181
Minn. 1979
v. F. D. Chapman Const. Co., 304 Minn. 334