Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kokesh v. City of Hopkins, 238 N.W.2d 882.
-
Dalvin Cook, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
6 (stating that orders denying motions to dismiss and for summary judgment generally are not appealable).
- Lisa Stone, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- Cruz-Guzman v. State 916 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2018
-
Cruz-Guzman v. State
916 N.W.2d 1
Minn. 2018
App. P. 103.03 ; Kokesh v. City of Hopkins , 307 Minn. 159 , , 884 (1976).
- Metropolitan Sheet Metal Journeyman & Apprentice Training Trust Fund v. County of Ramsey 832 N.W.2d 844 Minn. 2013
-
Metropolitan Sheet Metal Journeyman & Apprentice Training Trust Fund v. County of Ramsey
832 N.W.2d 844
Minn. 2013
Kokesh v. City of Hopkins, 307 Minn. 159, 162 , see also Miyoi v. Gold Bond Stamp Co. Bmps.
- Aon Corp. v. Haskins 817 N.W.2d 737 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
-
Aon Corp. v. Haskins
817 N.W.2d 737
Minn. Ct. App. 2012
App. P. 103.03; Kokesh v. City of Hopkins, 307 Minn. 159, 161
- Gallaher v. Titler 812 N.W.2d 897 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
-
Gallaher v. Titler
812 N.W.2d 897
Minn. Ct. App. 2012
See Kokesh v. City of Hopkins, 307 Minn. 159, 163 , (“We have previously indicated our intention to apply [Minn.Stat.
- State v. Wertheimer 781 N.W.2d 158 Minn. 2010
-
State v. Wertheimer
781 N.W.2d 158
Minn. 2010
The State cites Nelson v. Sandkamp, 227 Minn. 177 , Kokesh v. City of Hopkins, 307 Minn. 159 , to support the argument that section 645.15 applies to all statutes requiring the computation of time unless another method is specifically included in the statute.
- Jorgensen v. Knutson 662 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 2003
-
Jorgensen v. Knutson
662 N.W.2d 893
Minn. 2003
See Kokesh v. City of Hopkins, 807 Minn. 159 , 163, Nelson v. Sandkamp, 227 Minn. 177, 181-82
- Marzitelli v. City of Little Canada 582 N.W.2d 904 Minn. 1998
-
Marzitelli v. City of Little Canada
582 N.W.2d 904
Minn. 1998
See Kokesh v. City of Hopkins, 307 Minn. 159, 162
- In Re State & Regents Building Asbestos Cases 435 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1989
- NFD, INC. v. Stratford Leasing Co. 427 N.W.2d 757 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-
NFD, INC. v. Stratford Leasing Co.
427 N.W.2d 757
Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Kokesh v. City of Hopkins, 307 Minn. 159 , 161 n. 3, , 884 n. 3 (1976); see also Speyer v. Savogran Co., 267 Minn. 67, 68 , (order denying non-resident defendant’s motion to quash service was appealable as order “going to the merits of the action within the meaning of” statutory predecessor to Rule 103.03(d)).
- Miller v. City of Saint Paul 363 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Miller v. City of Saint Paul
363 N.W.2d 806
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Kokesh v. City of Hopkins, 307 Minn. 159
- Stonewall Insurance Co. v. Horak 325 N.W.2d 134 Minn. 1982
-
Stonewall Insurance Co. v. Horak
325 N.W.2d 134
Minn. 1982
See Kokesh v. City of Hopkins, 307 Minn. 159 , 161 n. 3, , 884 n. 3 (1976) (an order denying a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction is appealable).