Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Midway Center Associates v. Midway Center, Inc., 237 N.W.2d 76.

252 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Carrie Marie Lauderdale v. Scott James Lauderdale Minn. Ct. App. 2015
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356
Jovani Nassar, et al v. U.S. Home Corporation d/b/a Lennar Homes Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jovani Nassar, et al v. U.S. Home Corporation d/b/a Lennar Homes Minn. Ct. App. 2015
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356, (“[W]e do not reverse unless there is error causing harm to the appealing party.” (quotation and emphasis omitted)).
In the Matter of the Child of: C. A. L. and R. C. R., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Child of: C. A. L. and R. C. R., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356, (stating that to prevail on appeal, an appellant must show both error and prejudice resulting from the error); (applying Midway in a termination-of-parental-rights case).
Ricky Lee McDeid v. Lucinda Jesson, Commissioner of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ricky Lee McDeid v. Lucinda Jesson, Commissioner of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2015
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356, (stating that “error without prejudice is not ground for reversal”).
In re the Marriage of: Moslais X. Vue v. Khue Vue Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Moslais X. Vue v. Khue Vue Minn. Ct. App. 2015
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356
A14-0108 A14-0109 A14-0110 A14-0111 A14-0112 A14-0113 Sarah N. Lewis (A14-0106), Carole M. Smith (A14-0107), Leslie J. Shank (A14-0108), … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
A14-0108 A14-0109 A14-0110 A14-0111 A14-0112 A14-0113 Sarah N. Lewis (A14-0106), Carole M. Smith (A14-0107), Leslie J. Shank (A14-0108), … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356, (stating that to prevail on appeal, an appellant must show both error and prejudice resulting from the error).
Jacquelyn K. Schneewind v. Austin Mutual Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Jacquelyn K. Schneewind v. Austin Mutual Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356, (stating that to prevail on appeal, an appellant must show both error and prejudice resulting from the error).
In re the Guardianship and/or Conservatorship of Adeline V. Dorosh Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Irrevocable Trust of Kristin N. Kuelbs, Donald C. Hill and Edwardena C. Hill, Trustees; In … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Guardianship and/or Conservatorship of Adeline V. Dorosh Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356
In re the Irrevocable Trust of Kristin N. Kuelbs, Donald C. Hill and Edwardena C. Hill, Trustees; In … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356, ).
Guava LLC, et al., Michael Dugas v. Spencer Merkel, Qwest Communications Corporation, et al., John Doe 173.23.48.174, et … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Guava LLC, et al., Michael Dugas v. Spencer Merkel, Qwest Communications Corporation, et al., John Doe 173.23.48.174, et … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356
Donald R. Filler v. Soo Line Railroad Company d/b/a Canadian Pacific Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Donald R. Filler v. Soo Line Railroad Company d/b/a Canadian Pacific Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356, (stating that to prevail on appeal, the appellant must show both error and prejudice resulting from it); (stating that an evidentiary error is not prejudicial unless it might reasonably have influenced the trier of fact and chan
Eley v. Southshore Investments, Inc. 845 N.W.2d 216 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Eley v. Southshore Investments, Inc. 845 N.W.2d 216 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 806 Minn. 352 , 856, (stating that to prevail on appeal, an appellant must show both error and prejudice resulting from the error).
Horodenski v. Lyndale Green Townhome Ass'n 804 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Horodenski v. Lyndale Green Townhome Ass'n 804 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356
Palladium Holdings, LLC v. Zuni Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-OA1 775 N.W.2d 168 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Palladium Holdings, LLC v. Zuni Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-OA1 775 N.W.2d 168 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356
Thompson v. First State Bank of Fertile 709 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Thompson v. First State Bank of Fertile 709 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356 , (to prevail on appeal a party must show error and that error caused prejudice).
In Re the Welfare of the Children of J.B. 698 N.W.2d 160 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re the Welfare of the Children of J.B. 698 N.W.2d 160 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356 , (requiring party to show error and prejudice to prevail on appeal).
In Re Estate of Martignacco 689 N.W.2d 262 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re Estate of Martignacco 689 N.W.2d 262 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356 , (explaining that to prevail on appeal, a party must show error and that the error caused prejudice).
Lee v. Regents of the University of Minnesota 672 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Lee v. Regents of the University of Minnesota 672 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352 , (noting unless the district court error is prejudicial, no grounds exist for reversal).
Braith v. Fischer 632 N.W.2d 716 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Braith v. Fischer 632 N.W.2d 716 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356 , (to prevail on appeal a party must show error and that error caused prejudice); see also Minn. R. Civ.
Khawaja v. State Farm Insurance Companies 631 N.W.2d 106 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Khawaja v. State Farm Insurance Companies 631 N.W.2d 106 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356 , (stating appellant must show both error and prejudice to obtain reversal).
Balasuriya v. Bemel 617 N.W.2d 596 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Balasuriya v. Bemel 617 N.W.2d 596 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356 , (to prevail on appeal, appellants must show both error and that error caused prejudice); Minn. R. Civ.
Gun Lake Ass'n v. County of Aitkin 612 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Gun Lake Ass'n v. County of Aitkin 612 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356
Astleford Equipment Co. v. Navistar International Transportation Corp. 611 N.W.2d 33 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Astleford Equipment Co. v. Navistar International Transportation Corp. 611 N.W.2d 33 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356
Marriage of Toughill v. Toughill 609 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Marriage of Toughill v. Toughill 609 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356 , (to prevail on appeal, appellant must show both error and that error caused prejudice); Minn. R. Civ.
White v. MINN. DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES 567 N.W.2d 724 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
White v. MINN. DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES 567 N.W.2d 724 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356 , (quoting Waters v. Fiebelkorn, 216 Minn. 489, 495 , ).
Santillan v. Martine 560 N.W.2d 749 Minn. Ct. App. 1997