Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Midway Center Associates v. Midway Center, Inc., 237 N.W.2d 76.

249 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: M. C. R. and T. R. M., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356, 4 (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of the Administrative Citation: RFS 16-1206097, October 18, 2016, 3518 Logan Avenue North, Issued to: … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356, (quotation omitted).
Pakou Lee-Barrios and o/b/o Minor Child, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356, d 76, 78 (1975); Bloom v. Hydrotherm, Inc., review denied (Minn. June 28, 1993).
In re the Custody of A.M.W. Kelly James Wadsen, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356, (stating that to prevail on appeal, a party must show that the district court erred and that the error was prejudicial).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356
Father John Dee Czaplewski, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356
Nathan Tow-Arnett, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Inc. , 306 Minn. 352, 356, d 76, 78 (1975) .
Brent R. Henkel, Relator v. City of Mountain Iron, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Brent R. Henkel, Relator v. City of Mountain Iron, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356
In re the Marriage of: Christopher John Anton v. Romona L. Sparks, f/k/a Romona L. Anton Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Christopher John Anton v. Romona L. Sparks, f/k/a Romona L. Anton Minn. Ct. App. 2016
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356
Jessica Leah Weiss v. Alfred Aaron Griffin Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jessica Leah Weiss v. Alfred Aaron Griffin Minn. Ct. App. 2016
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 309 Minn. 352, 356, (stating that appellant must show both error and prejudice to obtain reversal).
Mohrman, Kaardal & Erickson, P. A., f/k/a Mohrman & Kaardal, P. A. v. Gene Rechtzigel, Gene Rechtzigel as … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Mohrman, Kaardal & Erickson, P. A., f/k/a Mohrman & Kaardal, P. A. v. Gene Rechtzigel, Gene Rechtzigel as … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356, (“[T]he burden of showing error rests upon the one who relies upon it.”).
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Roger Prout Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Roger Prout Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356, see Bloom v. Hydrotherm, Inc., (stating that the appellant bears the burden of demonstrating that error is prejudicial), review denied (Minn. June 28, 1993).
In the Matter of the Appointment of a Trustee for the Next of Kin of: Nadir Imbrahim Ombabi, … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Appointment of a Trustee for the Next of Kin of: Nadir Imbrahim Ombabi, … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356, (stating that to prevail on appeal, an appellant must show both error and prejudice resulting from the error).
In the Matter of: Laura Kay Ellingsworth, for herself and o/b/o N. R. E. v. Moses Abed Wazwaz Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of: Laura Kay Ellingsworth, for herself and o/b/o N. R. E. v. Moses Abed Wazwaz Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356, (explaining that an appellant must show both error and prejudice resulting from the error to prevail on appeal).
In the Matter of the Administrative Penalty Order of Fays Homestyle Catering. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Administrative Penalty Order of Fays Homestyle Catering. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356, see Bloom v. Hydrotherm, Inc., (stating that the appellant bears the burden of demonstrating that error is prejudicial), review denied (Minn. June 28, 1993).
Jessica Mattson v. City of Rushford, Minnowa Construction, Inc., State of Minnesota Department of Transportation, Edwards and Kelcey, … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jessica Mattson v. City of Rushford, Minnowa Construction, Inc., State of Minnesota Department of Transportation, Edwards and Kelcey, … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356, d 76, 78 (1975); see Bloom v. Hydrotherm, Inc., (stating that the appellant bears the burden of demonstrating that error is prejudicial), review denied (Minn. June 28, 1993).
Nathan J. Knoernschild v. Dennis Halverson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Nathan J. Knoernschild v. Dennis Halverson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
v. Midway Ctr, Inc., 309 Minn. 352, 356, (stating that appellant must show both error and prejudice to obtain reversal).
Randall Norman v. Crow Wing Cooperative Power & Light Company Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Randall Norman v. Crow Wing Cooperative Power & Light Company Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356
Robert Kagel v. Christian Brackey, Kagel Acquisition Company, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Robert Kagel v. Christian Brackey, Kagel Acquisition Company, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356
In Re the Custody of: A. J. O. David Ortiz v. Sarah Judith Un Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In Re the Custody of: A. J. O. David Ortiz v. Sarah Judith Un Minn. Ct. App. 2015
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356
In re the Marriage of: Christopher Pettey v. Melissa Denise Pettey Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Christopher Pettey v. Melissa Denise Pettey Minn. Ct. App. 2015
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356, (stating that, to prevail on appeal, a party must show error and that error caused prejudice); (citing rule 61 and Midway Ctr.
Peter Alan Krech v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Peter Alan Krech v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356, d 76, 78 (1975) (stating that an appellant must show both error and prejudice resulting from the error to prevail on appeal); Bloom v. Hydrotherm, Inc., (stating that the appellant bears the burden of demonstrating that error is prejudicial), review denied (Minn
In re the Marriage of: Mary Patricia Myhre v. Steven Kenneth Myhre Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Mary Patricia Myhre v. Steven Kenneth Myhre Minn. Ct. App. 2015
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356, (“It is well to bear in mind that on appeal error is never presumed.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: P. J. M. and A. D. H., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: P. J. M. and A. D. H., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356, d 76, 78 (1975) (stating that to prevail on appeal, an appellant must show both error and prejudice resulting from the error); (applying Midway in a termination-of-parental-rights case).
In re the Marriage of: Michelle Curtis v. Christopher John Hanna Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Rahn's Oil & Propane, Inc. v. Ettel Logistics, Inc., ELI Logistics, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Rahn's Oil & Propane, Inc. v. Ettel Logistics, Inc., ELI Logistics, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356, (stating that to prevail on appeal, an appellant must show both error and prejudice resulting from the error).
In re the Marriage of: Michelle Curtis v. Christopher John Hanna Minn. Ct. App. 2015
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356, (stating that to prevail on appeal, an appellant must show both error and prejudice resulting from the error).
In re the Marriage of: Carrie Marie Lauderdale v. Scott James Lauderdale Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Carrie Marie Lauderdale v. Scott James Lauderdale Minn. Ct. App. 2015
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356
Jovani Nassar v. U.S. Home Corporation d/b/a Lennar Homes Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jovani Nassar v. U.S. Home Corporation d/b/a Lennar Homes Minn. Ct. App. 2015
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356, (“[W]e do not reverse unless there is error causing harm to the appealing party.” (quotation and emphasis omitted)).