Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc., 260 N.W.2d 548.

156 citing documents.

Court of Appeals Thissen, J. Concurring, Anderson, J., Gildea, C.J. Fletcher Properties, Inc., et al., Minn. 2020
Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc., in which we struck down as equal protection violations statutes of limitations that applied only to select groups of defendants).
Court of Appeals Thissen, J. Minn. 2020
§ 541.051 (2018) when the building or project satisfies our definition of “improvement” set forth in Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yeager, Inc., d 548 (Minn. 1977), and its progeny, and is sufficiently complete so that the improvement may be turned over to the person who hired the construction entities to use it for the purpose for which it was intended.
Vill. Lofts At St. Anthony Falls Ass'n v. Hous. Partners Iii-Lofts LLC 924 N.W.2d 619 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Vill. Lofts At St. Anthony Falls Ass'n v. Hous. Partners Iii-Lofts LLC 924 N.W.2d 619 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc. , , 554 (Minn. 1977) ).
Great N. Ins. Co. v. Honeywell Int'l, Inc. 911 N.W.2d 510 Minn. 2018
Great N. Ins. Co. v. Honeywell Int'l, Inc. 911 N.W.2d 510 Minn. 2018
Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc. , , 554 (Minn. 1977), superseded by statute , Minn. Stat. § 541.051 (1980) ).
Curtis v. Altria Group, Inc. 813 N.W.2d 891 Minn. 2012
Curtis v. Altria Group, Inc. 813 N.W.2d 891 Minn. 2012
Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc., ).
In re Individual 35W Bridge Litigation 806 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 2011
In re Individual 35W Bridge Litigation 806 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 2011
In 1977, we reviewed the constitutionality of section 541.051 in Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc.
Siewert v. Northern States Power Co. 793 N.W.2d 272 Minn. 2011
Siewert v. Northern States Power Co. 793 N.W.2d 272 Minn. 2011
Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc., superseded by statute, Minn.Stat.
In Re Individual 35w Bridge Litigation 787 N.W.2d 643 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
In Re Individual 35w Bridge Litigation 787 N.W.2d 643 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc.
Dykes v. Sukup Manufacturing Co. 781 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 2010
Dykes v. Sukup Manufacturing Co. 781 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 2010
Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc.
Siewert v. Northern States Power Co. 757 N.W.2d 909 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Siewert v. Northern States Power Co. 757 N.W.2d 909 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc., , 554 *921 (Minn.1977).
State Farm Fire & Casualty v. Aquila Inc. 718 N.W.2d 879 Minn. 2006
State Farm Fire & Casualty v. Aquila Inc. 718 N.W.2d 879 Minn. 2006
This court has adopted a common-sense interpretation of the phrase “improvement to real property.” Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc.
Lietz v. Northern States Power Co. 718 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 2006
Lietz v. Northern States Power Co. 718 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 2006
Co. v. Thompsortr-Yaeger, Inc.
Weston v. McWilliams & Associates, Inc. 716 N.W.2d 634 Minn. 2006
Weston v. McWilliams & Associates, Inc. 716 N.W.2d 634 Minn. 2006
Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc.
Busch v. Model Corp. 708 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Busch v. Model Corp. 708 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc., (citation omitted).
Brink v. Smith Companies Construction, Inc. 703 N.W.2d 871 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Brink v. Smith Companies Construction, Inc. 703 N.W.2d 871 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc.
State Farm Fire & Casualty v. Aquila Inc. 697 N.W.2d 636 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State Farm Fire & Casualty v. Aquila Inc. 697 N.W.2d 636 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc.
Weston v. McWilliams & Associates, Inc. 694 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Weston v. McWilliams & Associates, Inc. 694 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc.
Olmanson v. LeSueur County 693 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 2005
Olmanson v. LeSueur County 693 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 2005
Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc.
Allianz Insurance Co. v. PM Services of Eden Prairie, Inc. 691 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Merritt v. Mendel 690 N.W.2d 570 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Merritt v. Mendel 690 N.W.2d 570 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc., (applying the same definition of “improvement” in the context of Minn.Stat.
Allianz Insurance Co. v. PM Services of Eden Prairie, Inc. 691 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Co. v. Thompsom-Yaeger, Inc., for the definition of improvement to real property).
In Re Wren 685 N.W.2d 721 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re Wren 685 N.W.2d 721 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc., (stating courts are to give effect to plain meaning of the statute’s words “without resort to technical legal constructions of its terms”); Brandt v. Hallwood Mgmt.
Jensen-Re Partnership v. Superior Shores Lakehome Ass'n 681 N.W.2d 42 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Jensen-Re Partnership v. Superior Shores Lakehome Ass'n 681 N.W.2d 42 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc., ), review denied (Minn. June 10, 1992).
Olmanson v. Le Sueur County 673 N.W.2d 506 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Taney v. Independent School District No. 624 673 N.W.2d 497 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Olmanson v. Le Sueur County 673 N.W.2d 506 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc., (superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in O’Brien v. U.O.P., Inc., 701 F.Supp.
Taney v. Independent School District No. 624 673 N.W.2d 497 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc., (applying the same definition of “improvement” in the context of Minn.Stat.
Nolan and Nolan v. City of Eagan 673 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Nolan and Nolan v. City of Eagan 673 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc., (superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in O’Brien v. U.O.P., Inc., 701 F.Supp.
Farmer's State Bank of Darwin v. Swisher 631 N.W.2d 796 Minn. 2001
Farmer's State Bank of Darwin v. Swisher 631 N.W.2d 796 Minn. 2001
Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc., (explaining and applying Minnesota’s comparative fault statute in the context of a negligence action).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by