Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Township of Sterling v. Griffin, 244 N.W.2d 129.
- Dale LeRoy Tiede v. County of Le Sueur, Daniel J. Sullivan, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
Dale LeRoy Tiede v. County of Le Sueur, Daniel J. Sullivan, ...
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“[K]nowledge of the existence of the easement is a factor to be considered in determining possession.”
-
A21-0832
Minn. 2023
of Sterling v. Griffin , (“The fact that the owner of an old, outstanding interest is a public body is not a sufficient public interest to defeat the larger interest of the public in greater security in real estate transactions.”).
- In the Matter of the Application of Mojtaba Sharifkhani to Register Title to Certain Land. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-
Ross R. Lundstrom, et al., Appellants,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(“[T]own roads are not exempt from the application of the [MTA].”).
-
A21-0832
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Township of Villard v. Hoting , d 826, 829 (Minn. App. 1989) (“[A] township must comply with the requirement that it 12 record properly its po ssessory interest in a public road within 40 years of the road’s establishment or it will be presumed to have abandoned its right to the road.”)
-
County of Pope, Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(noting that even the absence of a physically constructed and maintained road would not have been fatal to township ’s 10 possession claim if the evidence had established “ that the public used the ‘roadway’ in a manner from which it could reasonably be concluded that the public was using the a
- State of Minnesota, by its Commissioner of Transportation v. Robert P. Carlson, North Shore Federal Credit Union, Below. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
State of Minnesota, by its Commissioner of Transportation v. Robert P. Carlson, North Shore Federal Credit Union, Below.
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
v. Griffin, 309 Minn. 230, 235-36
- Sampair v. Village of Birchwood 784 N.W.2d 65 Minn. 2010
-
Sampair v. Village of Birchwood
784 N.W.2d 65
Minn. 2010
See Township of Sterling v. Griffin, 309 Minn. 230, 236
- State Ex Rel. Department of Natural Resources v. Hess 684 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 2004
- Lindberg v. Fasching 667 N.W.2d 481 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
-
Lindberg v. Fasching
667 N.W.2d 481
Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Township of Sterling v. Griffin, 309 Minn. 230, 237-38
- Foster v. Bergstrom 515 N.W.2d 581 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-
Foster v. Bergstrom
515 N.W.2d 581
Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Township of Sterling v. Griffin, 309 Minn. 230, 235
- Weber v. Eisentrager 490 N.W.2d 131 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
-
Weber v. Eisentrager
490 N.W.2d 131
Minn. Ct. App. 1992
They cite Township of Sterling v. Griffin, 309 Minn. 230 , for the proposition that the MTA must be construed in light of the public interest in greater security of individuals’ claims to ownership of land.
- Township of Villard v. Hoting 442 N.W.2d 826 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
-
Township of Villard v. Hoting
442 N.W.2d 826
Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Township of Sterling v. Griffin, 309 Minn. 230, 234-35 , -33 (1976); see Minn.Stat.
- Lucas v. Independent School District No. 284 433 N.W.2d 94 Minn. 1988
-
Lucas v. Independent School District No. 284
433 N.W.2d 94
Minn. 1988
747, 748 (1893); Township of Sterling v. Griffin, 309 Minn. 230, 234
- Richards Asphalt Co. v. Bunge Corp. 399 N.W.2d 188 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
Richards Asphalt Co. v. Bunge Corp.
399 N.W.2d 188
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Township of Sterling v. Griffin, 309 Minn. 230, 236
- Henley v. County of Chisago 370 N.W.2d 920 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Henley v. County of Chisago
370 N.W.2d 920
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See Ravenna Township at 219 ; Township of Sterling v. Griffin 309 Minn. 230, 235 , Wichelman v. *925 Messner, 250 Minn. 88, 112
- Northfork Township v. Joffer 353 N.W.2d 216 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Northfork Township v. Joffer
353 N.W.2d 216
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
The requisite degree of possession “is such as will provide notice of the possessor’s interest in the property.” Township of Sterling v. Griffin, 309 Minn. 230, 236
- Ravenna Township v. Grunseth 314 N.W.2d 214 Minn. 1981
-
Ravenna Township v. Grunseth
314 N.W.2d 214
Minn. 1981
While the degree of maintenance by respondent township may be consistent with its intent that the road maintain a “low profile,” it nevertheless falls short of the indicia of road maintenance “as that term is normally used in conjunction with road care.” Township of Sterling v. Griffin, 309 Minn. 230, 237