Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp., 257 N.W.2d 679.

126 citing documents.

Konken v. Oakland Farmers' Elevator Co. 425 N.W.2d 302 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
The Workers’ Compensation Act essentially creates a “non-fault recovery system for accidents arising out of and in the course of employment.” Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp., 312 Minn. 114, 120 , see also Minn.Stat.
Hodder v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. 426 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 1988
Hodder v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. 426 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 1988
For example, see Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp., 312 Minn. 114 , and their progeny.
Todalen v. United States Chemical Co. 424 N.W.2d 73 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Todalen v. United States Chemical Co. 424 N.W.2d 73 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp., 312 Minn. 114 , see also Kordosky v. Conway Fire & Safety, Inc.
Klemetsen v. STENBERG CONST. CO., INC. 415 N.W.2d 887 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Klemetsen v. STENBERG CONST. CO., INC. 415 N.W.2d 887 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See, e.g., Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corporation, 312 Minn. 114
Locher v. Gareis 411 N.W.2d 273 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Locher v. Gareis 411 N.W.2d 273 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp., 312 Minn. 114, 121
Shore v. Minneapolis Auto Auction, Inc. 410 N.W.2d 862 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Shore v. Minneapolis Auto Auction, Inc. 410 N.W.2d 862 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Recreational Engineering, however, argues that Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp., 312 Minn. 114 , has eroded the Lunderberg holding.
Nelson v. Larsen 405 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Nelson v. Larsen 405 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In particular, they rely on Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp., 312 Minn. 114 , where the supreme court allowed a claim for contribution against a negligent employer by a third party manufacturer, despite the exclusivity of the workers’ compensation statute.
Buttz v. Bergeson 392 N.W.2d 917 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Buttz v. Bergeson 392 N.W.2d 917 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp., 312 Minn. 114, 119 , Bisbee v. Ruppert, 306 Minn. 39, 48-49
Germann v. F.L. Smithe Co. 384 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Germann v. F.L. Smithe Co. 384 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
§ 549.09 does not alter the rule in Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corporation, 312 Minn. 114 , that the employer’s contribution to a third party is not to exceed its total workers’ compensation liability to the plaintiff/employee.
Kempa v. E.W. Coons Co. 370 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 1985
Kempa v. E.W. Coons Co. 370 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 1985
See Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp., 312 Minn. 114
Haase v. Haase 369 N.W.2d 311 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Haase v. Haase 369 N.W.2d 311 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp., 312 Minn. 114,122
Peterson v. Little-Giant Glencoe Portable Elevator Division of Dynamics Corp. of America 366 N.W.2d 111 Minn. 1985
Peterson v. Little-Giant Glencoe Portable Elevator Division of Dynamics Corp. of America 366 N.W.2d 111 Minn. 1985
Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp., 312 Minn. 114
Yates v. Hanna Min. Co., Inc. 365 N.W.2d 783 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Yates v. Hanna Min. Co., Inc. 365 N.W.2d 783 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
The Cambern majority observed: The dissent points out that since Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp., 312 Minn. 114 , the manufacturer has had a contribution claim against the plaintiff’s employer and, therefore, can sue the employer as a third-party defendant.
Wilken v. International Harvester Co. 363 N.W.2d 763 Minn. 1985
Wilken v. International Harvester Co. 363 N.W.2d 763 Minn. 1985
Under Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp., 312 Minn. 114 , a third-party tortfeasor is entitled to contribution from a negligent employer in an amount proportional to the employer’s fault “but not to exceed its total workers’ compensation liability to plaintiff.” Id.
Isker v. Gardner 360 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Isker v. Gardner 360 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
We have also examined Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corporation, 312 Minn. 114
Bekis v. Schilling 357 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Bekis v. Schilling 357 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
For example, Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp., 312 Minn. 114 , held that a third party was entitled to contribution from a negligent employer, but limited the amount of contribution to no more than the employer’s worker’s compensation liability.
Peterson v. Little-Giant Glencoe Portable Elevator Division of Dynamics Corp. of America 349 N.W.2d 280 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Peterson v. Little-Giant Glencoe Portable Elevator Division of Dynamics Corp. of America 349 N.W.2d 280 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Glencoe maintains, however, that Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp., 312 Minn. 114 , controls.
Hafner v. Iverson 343 N.W.2d 634 Minn. 1984
Hafner v. Iverson 343 N.W.2d 634 Minn. 1984
The defendants in turn, as third-party plaintiffs, commenced a third-party action against plaintiffs’ employer, Collins Electric, for contribution under the doctrine of Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp., 312 Minn. 114
Horton Ex Rel. Horton v. Orbeth, Inc. 342 N.W.2d 112 Minn. 1984
Horton Ex Rel. Horton v. Orbeth, Inc. 342 N.W.2d 112 Minn. 1984
Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp., 312 Minn. 114 , and its *115 progeny do not stand as authority for the proposition that common liability is no longer relevant to the availability of contribution.
Cambern v. Sioux Tools, Inc. 323 N.W.2d 795 Minn. 1982
Hudson v. Snyder Body, Inc. 326 N.W.2d 149 Minn. 1982
Cambern v. Sioux Tools, Inc. 323 N.W.2d 795 Minn. 1982
In turn, Sioux Tools brought in the employer, Bayliner Boats, Inc., as a third-party defendant for contribution under Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp., 312 Minn. 114
Hudson v. Snyder Body, Inc. 326 N.W.2d 149 Minn. 1982
It is true that Hudson could not have recovered from Olsen had direct suit been allowed, his negligence being as great as that of the employer; however, in Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp., 312 Minn. 114 , we ruled that a third-party tortfeasor is entitled to contribution from an employer who is also found negligent.
Conover v. Northern States Power Co. 313 N.W.2d 397 Minn. 1981
Conover v. Northern States Power Co. 313 N.W.2d 397 Minn. 1981
Moreover, for the purpose of determining a contractor’s contribution under Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp., 312 Minn. 114 , the jury would have to distinguish, in appropriate cases, between the contractor’s breach of his own duty and his breach of the employer’s nondelegable duty.
Lockwood v. Independent School District No. 877 312 N.W.2d 924 Minn. 1981
Vesely, Otto, Miller & Keefe v. Blake 311 N.W.2d 3 Minn. 1981
Vesely, Otto, Miller & Keefe v. Blake 311 N.W.2d 3 Minn. 1981
See, e.g., Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp., 312 Minn. 114
Bebeau v. Mart 310 N.W.2d 465 Minn. 1981
Bebeau v. Mart 310 N.W.2d 465 Minn. 1981
(trial court has broad discretion in determining whether a new trial should be granted for excessive damages).
Jones v. Fisher 309 N.W.2d 726 Minn. 1981
Jones v. Fisher 309 N.W.2d 726 Minn. 1981
The dramshops’ argument is inconsistent with Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp., 312 Minn. 114 , and Tolbert v. Gerber Industries, Inc., in which we emphasized that contribution is used to secure restitution and a fair apportionment of loss among all those whose activities combine to produce the injury.