Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp., 257 N.W.2d 679.

126 citing documents.

Sargent v. Preston-Haglin Construction Co. 304 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1981
Sargent v. Preston-Haglin Construction Co. 304 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1981
6 (1976), 1 by extending the equitable policies enunciated in Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corporation, 312 Minn. 114 , to a unique factual situation.
Kordosky v. Conway Fire & Safety, Inc. 304 N.W.2d 616 Minn. 1981
Kordosky v. Conway Fire & Safety, Inc. 304 N.W.2d 616 Minn. 1981
In Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp., 312 Minn. 114 , this court held that a third party sued by an employee was entitled to contribution from a negligent employer.
Kealy v. St. Paul Housing & Redevelopment Authority 303 N.W.2d 468 Minn. 1981
Kealy v. St. Paul Housing & Redevelopment Authority 303 N.W.2d 468 Minn. 1981
Systems, Inc., discussed in Steenson, supra, note 6, at 289-302; Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp., 312 Minn. 114 , discussed in Note, Contribution and Indemnity — An Examination of the Upheaval in Minnesota Tort Loss Allocation Concepts, 5 Wm.
Lemmer v. IDS Properties, Inc. 304 N.W.2d 864 Minn. 1980
Lemmer v. IDS Properties, Inc. 304 N.W.2d 864 Minn. 1980
In Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp., 312 Minn. 114 , contribution was allowed where both parties were liable to the plaintiff, but where they were not joint tortfeasors.
Vieths v. Ripley 295 N.W.2d 659 Minn. 1980
Vieths v. Ripley 295 N.W.2d 659 Minn. 1980
See Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp., 312 Minn. 114
Lange Ex Rel. Lange v. Schweitzer 295 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 1980
Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc. 297 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1980
Lange Ex Rel. Lange v. Schweitzer 295 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 1980
See Busch v. Busch Const., Inc., Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp., 312 Minn. 114
Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc. 297 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1980
Bisbee v. Ruppert, 306 Minn. 39
Conde v. City of Spring Lake Park 290 N.W.2d 164 Minn. 1980
Conde v. City of Spring Lake Park 290 N.W.2d 164 Minn. 1980
1 Secondly appellants argue that our decisions in Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp., 312 Minn. 114 , compel us to take a second look at Ascheman .
Nelson v. Nelson 283 N.W.2d 375 Minn. 1979
Nelson v. Nelson 283 N.W.2d 375 Minn. 1979
Johnson v. Raske Building Systems, Inc. 276 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 1979
Johnson v. Raske Building Systems, Inc. 276 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 1979
6, and our decision in Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp., 312 Minn. 114
Hart v. Cessna Aircraft Co. 276 N.W.2d 166 Minn. 1979
Hart v. Cessna Aircraft Co. 276 N.W.2d 166 Minn. 1979
Although we have modified the requirement where necessary to achieve an equitable result, see, Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp., Minn., but see, elimination or modification of the requirement of common liability would be inappropriate in this case where a jury found that Vogt was not negligent.
Bigham v. J. C. Penney Co. 268 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 1978
Bigham v. J. C. Penney Co. 268 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 1978
He felt that a flash-over was “one of the hazards that a lineman has to accept.” Aside from the Worker’s 7 this assump *899 tion of risk would be an absolute bar to a suit by plaintiff against NSP since the accident happened prior to Springrose v. Willmore, supra.
Hake v. Soo Line Railway Co. 258 N.W.2d 576 Minn. 1977
Hake v. Soo Line Railway Co. 258 N.W.2d 576 Minn. 1977
Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp., Minn.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by