Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Goulette, 258 N.W.2d 758.

231 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Dusty Lee Littledog Minn. Ct. App. 2014
North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 37, 91 S. Ct. 160, 167 (1970); (recognizing Alford pleas in Minnesota).
State of Minnesota v. Eric Lee Budreau Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Eric Lee Budreau Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(citing North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S. Ct. 160 (1970)).
State of Minnesota v. Kanishka Shereal Molina Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Kanishka Shereal Molina Minn. Ct. App. 2014
ord plea permits a district court to accept a guilty plea even though the defendant maintains his or her innocence if the district court examines the factual basis of the guilty plea and concludes through a colloquy with the defendant that there is “evidence [that] would support a jury verdict of guilty, and that the plea is voluntarily, knowingly, and understandingly entered.” accord North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct.
State v. Klug 839 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Klug 839 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
“Neither the constitution nor our Rules of Criminal Procedure give to a criminal defendant an absolute right to have his plea of guilty accepted.”
In re Disciplinary Action Against Griffith 838 N.W.2d 792 Minn. 2013
Miller v. State 816 N.W.2d 547 Minn. 2012
Miller v. State 816 N.W.2d 547 Minn. 2012
160 , 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970); -61 (Minn.1977) (following Alford in accepting a guilty plea without admission of guilt).
State v. Martinez-Mendoza 804 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2011
State v. Schlienz 774 N.W.2d 361 Minn. 2009
State v. Schlienz 774 N.W.2d 361 Minn. 2009
160 , 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970) (upholding acceptance of plea even though defendant maintained innocence); -61 (Minn.1977) (following Alford in accepting plea without admission of guilt).
Williams v. State 760 N.W.2d 8 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Williams v. State 760 N.W.2d 8 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
160, 167 , 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970)); (adopting Alford rationale).
State v. Verdon 757 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Verdon 757 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
(concluding that the defendant’s testimony at the plea hearing established an adequate factual basis); (endorsing the use of witness statements or testimony to develop a factual basis).
In Re the Civil Commitment of Rannow 749 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In Re the Civil Commitment of Rannow 749 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
(adopting the United States Supreme Court’s holding in Alford in the context of a criminal plea and placing particular emphasis on the need to ensure a strong factual basis is present making conviction probable before deeming such a plea as having been voluntarily and intelligently made).
State v. Theis 742 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 2007
State v. Theis 742 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 2007
The Supreme Court recognized that convictions based on guilty pleas are generally “justified by the defendant’s admission of guilt and by the defendant’s knowing and voluntary waiver of a trial.” (citing Alford, 400 U.S. at 25 , 91 S.Ct.
State v. Pendleton 706 N.W.2d 500 Minn. 2005
State v. Pendleton 706 N.W.2d 500 Minn. 2005
(citing North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 37 , 91 S.Ct.
State v. Rannow 703 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Rannow 703 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
(adopting holding of North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 , 91 S.Ct.
State v. Kilgore 661 N.W.2d 654 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Kilgore 661 N.W.2d 654 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
The Minnesota Supreme Court accepted the logic of Alford in State v. Goulette, wherein the court stated in part: “There are situations where defendant’s decision to plead guilty is a rational decision even though defendant for some reason cannot bring himself to admit his guilt.”
In Re the Welfare of J.J.R. 648 N.W.2d 739 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re the Welfare of J.J.R. 648 N.W.2d 739 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
was attempting to enter an Alford plea, the basis for such a (holding that plea of guilty may be accepted, even if accused protests that he is innocent, if court concludes that the evidence would support a jury verdict of guilty and the plea is voluntarily, knowingly, and understandingly entered).
State v. Misquadace 644 N.W.2d 65 Minn. 2002
State v. Misquadace 644 N.W.2d 65 Minn. 2002
160 , 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970); *67 (holding that plea from defendant who maintains innocence may be accepted if evidence would support a jury verdict of guilty and plea is voluntarily, knowingly, and understandingly entered).
State v. Misquadace 629 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Misquadace 629 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Schmit 601 N.W.2d 896 Minn. 1999
State v. Schmit 601 N.W.2d 896 Minn. 1999
(adopting North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 , 91 S.Ct.
State v. Pero 590 N.W.2d 319 Minn. 1999
State v. Pero 590 N.W.2d 319 Minn. 1999
(holding that "[n]either the constitution nor our Rules of Criminal Procedure give to a criminal defendant an absolute right to have his plea of guilty accepted”); see also State v. Linehan, 276 Minn. 349, 353 , (holding that there is no "absolute right on the part of a def
State v. Powell 578 N.W.2d 727 Minn. 1998
State v. Powell 578 N.W.2d 727 Minn. 1998
see North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 , 91 S.Ct.
Powell v. State 562 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Powell v. State 562 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Perkins v. State 559 N.W.2d 678 Minn. 1997
Perkins v. State 559 N.W.2d 678 Minn. 1997
State v. Kissner 541 N.W.2d 317 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Kissner 541 N.W.2d 317 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
“Neither the constitution nor our Rules of Criminal Procedure give to a criminal defendant *325 an absolute right to have his plea of guilty accepted.”
State v. Ecker 524 N.W.2d 712 Minn. 1994
State v. Ecker 524 N.W.2d 712 Minn. 1994
160, 167 , 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970)
Barnes v. State 489 N.W.2d 273 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Barnes v. State 489 N.W.2d 273 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Barnes then agreed to enter a
City of St. Paul v. Various Items of Drug Paraphernalia 474 N.W.2d 413 Minn. Ct. App. 1991