DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Goulette, 258 N.W.2d 758.

231 citing documents.

  • City of St. Paul v. Various Items of Drug Paraphernalia 474 N.W.2d 413 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
    -61 (Minn.1977), the Minnesota Supreme Court held a trial court may accept a plea of guilty by an accused even though the accused protests that he is innocent.
  • Bourbon Bar & Cafe Corp. v. City of St. Paul 466 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • Bourbon Bar & Cafe Corp. v. City of St. Paul 466 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
    at 167-68 ; 761 (Minn.1977) (adopting Alford).
  • State v. Glidden 459 N.W.2d 136 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • State v. Glidden 459 N.W.2d 136 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
    160 , 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970) for the proposition that a party may plead guilty yet maintain their innocence.
  • State v. Fett 414 N.W.2d 783 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Fett 414 N.W.2d 783 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Newcombe 412 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Newcombe 412 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    This is an appeal from a conviction for aggravated robbery following a plea of guilty entered pursuant to a (allowing guilty plea by defendant maintaining his innocence).
  • State v. Lyle 409 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Lyle 409 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Schroeder 401 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Schroeder 401 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    The supreme court explained: a trial court may accept a plea of guilty by a defendant even though the defendant denies his guilt if the trial court concludes that the state has evidence which would support a jury verdict of guilty of a crime at least as serious as that to which the defendant is pleading guilty and if the defendant’s
  • State v. Winchell 363 N.W.2d 747 Minn. 1985
  • State v. Winchell 363 N.W.2d 747 Minn. 1985
    a trial court may accept a plea of guilty by a defendant even though the defendant denies his guilt if the trial court concludes that the state has evidence which would support a jury verdict of guilty of a crime at least as serious as that to which the defendant is pleading guilty and if the defendant’s
  • State v. Trott 338 N.W.2d 248 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Trott 338 N.W.2d 248 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Risken 331 N.W.2d 489 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Risken 331 N.W.2d 489 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Brown 324 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Brown 324 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1982
    State v. Hoaglund, 307 Minn. 322 , State v. Russell, 306 Minn. 274
  • State v. Jenson 312 N.W.2d 673 Minn. 1981
  • State v. Jenson 312 N.W.2d 673 Minn. 1981
    which gives to the trial court discretion to accept an Alford type guilty plea if the trial court carefully determines that the plea is intelligent (that is, knowing and understanding) and voluntary and if there is a strong factual basis on the record for it.
  • State v. Melina 295 N.W.2d 644 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Melina 295 N.W.2d 644 Minn. 1980
    State v. Hoaglund, 307 Minn. 322 , State v. Russell, 306 Minn. 274
  • Kochevar v. State 281 N.W.2d 680 Minn. 1979
  • Kochevar v. State 281 N.W.2d 680 Minn. 1979
    State v. Hoaglund, 307 Minn. 322
  • Holscher v. State 282 N.W.2d 866 Minn. 1979
  • Holscher v. State 282 N.W.2d 866 Minn. 1979
    the factual basis supporting the defendant’s Alford-type plea consisted of a statement by defense counsel summarizing the key evidence which the prosecutor would have offered if the case had gone to trial.
  • State v. Genereux 272 N.W.2d 33 Minn. 1978
  • State v. Genereux 272 N.W.2d 33 Minn. 1978
    State v. Goulette, Minn., State v. Gustafson, 298 Minn. 200