DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Goblirsch, 246 N.W.2d 12.

30 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
    In State v. Goblirsch , 309 Minn. 401, 403-04, -14 (1976) an infant died from a brain hemorrhage as a result of his father’s assault.
  • State v. Schaeffer 452 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • State v. Schaeffer 452 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
    2248 , 90 L.Ed.2d 694 (1986); State v. Hill, 312 Minn. 514, 525 , State v. Goblirsch, 309 Minn. 401, 407 , State v. Perry, 274 Minn. 1, 12-13 , pet.
  • State v. Jurgens 424 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • State v. Jurgens 424 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    Although a number of these cases are prosecutions for first degree manslaughter, State v. Goblirsch, 309 Minn. 401 , and Loss , we find no indication battered child syndrome cannot be used to help establish felonious intent.
  • State v. Erickson 403 N.W.2d 281 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Erickson 403 N.W.2d 281 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    State v. Goblirsch, 309 Minn. 401, 407 , State v. Perry, 274 Minn. 1, 12-13
  • State v. Litzau 377 N.W.2d 53 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Litzau 377 N.W.2d 53 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    The State argues that State v. Goblirsch, 309 Minn. 401 , and State v. Hill, 312 Minn. 514 , support its contention that the supreme court has explicitly recognized stipulation as a separate basis for admitting polygraph evidence.
  • Marriage of M.N.D. v. B.M.D. 356 N.W.2d 809 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • Mnd v. Bmd 356 N.W.2d 813 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • Marriage of M.N.D. v. B.M.D. 356 N.W.2d 809 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    (citing State v. Goblirsch, 309 Minn. 401 , ); C.M.C.
  • Mnd v. Bmd 356 N.W.2d 813 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    (citing State v. Goblirsch, 309 Minn. 401 , ); C.M.C.
  • State v. Michaeloff 324 N.W.2d 926 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Michaeloff 324 N.W.2d 926 Minn. 1982
    We decline defendant’s request that we reconsider the long-established rule of inadmissibility of polygraph test results “because of the prosecution’s nonparticipation, and because we are not persuaded that the reliability of polygraph evidence has improved sufficiently in recent years to warrant reversing * * * prior decisions [of this court] or questioning their rationale.” State v. Goblirsch, 309 Minn. 401
  • State v. McGee 324 N.W.2d 232 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Durfee 322 N.W.2d 778 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Durfee 322 N.W.2d 778 Minn. 1982
    As we noted in State v. Goblirsch, 309 Minn. 401 , the phrase “battered child syndrome” has an accusatory connotation, yet it is intended to indicate only that the child was not injured accidentally and does not constitute an opinion as to whether any particular person injured the child.
  • Schleret v. State 311 N.W.2d 843 Minn. 1981
  • Schleret v. State 311 N.W.2d 843 Minn. 1981
    The term we have adopted to describe the offense is the “battered child syndrome.” State v. Goblirsch, 309 Minn. 401 , State v. Loss, 295 Minn. 271
  • State v. Loebach 310 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 1981
  • State v. Loebach 310 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 1981
    In State v. Goblirsch, 309 Minn. 401 , the court determined that “battering parent” evidence was not an indispensable element of the state’s case in a prosecution arising from child abuse, but held it was not reversible error to receive it into evidence.
  • State by Spannaus v. Century Camera, Inc. 309 N.W.2d 735 Minn. 1981
  • State by Spannaus v. Century Camera, Inc. 309 N.W.2d 735 Minn. 1981
    759 , 54 L.Ed.2d 777 (1978); State v. Goblirsch, 309 Minn. 401, 407
  • Gordon v. Hoffman 303 N.W.2d 250 Minn. 1981
  • Gordon v. Hoffman 303 N.W.2d 250 Minn. 1981
    State v. Goblirsch, 309 Minn. 401
  • State v. MacK 292 N.W.2d 764 Minn. 1980
  • State v. MacK 292 N.W.2d 764 Minn. 1980
    7 State v. Kolander, 236 Minn. 209, 220-21 , -65 (1952); State v. Goblirsch, 309 Minn. 401 , State v. Hill, 312 Minn. 514
  • State v. Hill 253 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1977
  • State v. Hill 253 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1977
    In State v. Goblirsch, 309 Minn. 401, 407 , a case in which we were urged to reverse because of failure to admit evidence of a polygraph test, we observed: “* * * Defendant urges that this court now reconsider the rule of inadmissibility set down in these earlier cases.