DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Bott, 246 N.W.2d 48.

53 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    The supreme court has explained that “[t]he word ‘wrong’ in this statute is ‘used in the moral sense.’” Roberts, d at 868 ().
  • A21-0480 Minn. 2023
    Paige, d at 303 ( for the principle that it does not always violate due process to place the burden of proving an affirmative defense on the defendant).
  • State of Minnesota v. Ishmael Roberts 876 N.W.2d 863 Minn. 2016
  • State of Minnesota v. Ishmael Roberts 876 N.W.2d 863 Minn. 2016
    The word “wrong” in this statute is “used in the moral sense.” State v. Bott, 310 Minn. 331, 336
  • State of Minnesota v. Cartrell Ismail Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2016
  • State of Minnesota v. Cartrell Ismail Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2016
    Unfair prejudice has been defined as “an undue tendency to suggest decision on an improper basis, commonly, though not necessarily, an emotional one.” State v. Bott, 310 Minn. 331, 338 n.3, n.3 (1976).
  • Jane Doe 136 v. Ralph Liebsch 872 N.W.2d 875 Minn. 2015
  • Jane Doe 136 v. Ralph Liebsch 872 N.W.2d 875 Minn. 2015
    This probative value is balanced against the “unfair advantage that results from the capacity of the evidence to persuade by illegitimate means.” , 247 n. 2 (Minn.1985) (quoting 22 C. Wright & K. Graham, Federal Practice and Procedure — Evidence § 5215 (1978)); see also State v. Bott, 310 Minn. 331 , 338 n. 3, , 53 n. 3 (1976) (“ ‘Unfair prejudice’ includes an undue tendency to suggest decision on an improper basis, commonly, though not necessarily, an emotional one.” (quoting Fed.R.Evid.
  • Schleicher v. State 718 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 2006
  • Sentinel Management Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 615 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 2000
  • Sentinel Management Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 615 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 2000
    See State v. Bott, 310 Minn. 331, 334
  • State v. Schreiber 558 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 1997
  • State v. Schreiber 558 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 1997
    See State v. Bott, 310 Minn. 331, 335 , (citing Leland v. Oregon, 343 U.S. 790 , 72 S.Ct.
  • State v. Brink 500 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • State v. Brink 500 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
    (psychologist testified that defendant’s mental condition of obsessive compulsive schizoid personality with involutional paranoid depression psychosis permitted defendant to realize the nature of the act but not that it was wrong; psychologist also “reconstructed the defendant’s thought processes” at the time of the incident); State v. Bott, 310 Minn. 331, 333-34 , (no error in allowing psychiatrist to testify that defendant told him his *806 intent was not merely to harm but to kill and to give
  • State v. Moore 458 N.W.2d 90 Minn. 1990
  • State v. Moore 458 N.W.2d 90 Minn. 1990
    “The question of proper foundation is largely one for the discretion of the trial court * * State v. Bott, 310 Minn. 331, 334
  • State v. Blasus 445 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 1989
  • State v. Flores 418 N.W.2d 150 Minn. 1988
  • State v. Flores 418 N.W.2d 150 Minn. 1988
    State v. Bott, 310 Minn. 331, 338
  • State v. Ward 361 N.W.2d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Ward 361 N.W.2d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    State v. Bott, 310 Minn. 331, 338 , McCormick, Law of Evidence, § 212 (2d Ed.1972).
  • State v. Bouwman 354 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Bouwman 354 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1984
    d at 907 ; State v. Bott, 310 Minn. 331, 335
  • DeMars v. State 352 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 1984
  • DeMars v. State 352 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 1984
    State v. Bott, 310 Minn. 331, 334
  • State v. Ulm 326 N.W.2d 159 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Ulm 326 N.W.2d 159 Minn. 1982
    State v. Bott, 310 Minn. 331, 336 , State v. Rawland, 294 Minn. 17
  • State v. Linder 304 N.W.2d 902 Minn. 1981
  • State v. Linder 304 N.W.2d 902 Minn. 1981
    State v. Bott, 310 Minn. 331, 335
  • Brown v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters 293 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 1980
  • Brown v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters 293 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 1980
    State v. Bott, 310 Minn. 331, 338-39 , -54 (1976).
  • State v. Carpenter 282 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 1979
  • State v. Carpenter 282 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 1979
    This issue has been previously decided by this court, State v. Mytych, 292 Minn. 248 , and reaffirmed in 1976 in State v. Bott, 310 Minn. 331 , , to which we adhere.
  • State v. Lee 282 N.W.2d 896 Minn. 1979
  • State v. Lee 282 N.W.2d 896 Minn. 1979
    This issue was addressed less than a in which this court reaffirmed State v. Bott, 310 Minn. 331, 337 , where the trial court was held not to have committed error in refusing to instruct the jury as to the disposition of a defendant found not guilty by reason of mental illness.
  • State v. Malley 285 N.W.2d 469 Minn. 1979
  • State v. Larson 281 N.W.2d 481 Minn. 1979
  • State v. Larson 281 N.W.2d 481 Minn. 1979
    State v. Bott, 310 Minn. 331, 335 , State v. Hoskins, 292 Minn. 111, 134
  • State v. Underwood 281 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1979
  • State v. Underwood 281 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1979
    Cf. State v. Bott, 310 Minn. 331 , (instruction held proper in context of insanity defense).
  • State v. Carignan 271 N.W.2d 442 Minn. 1978
  • State v. Carignan 271 N.W.2d 442 Minn. 1978
    The specific issue whether an exception to this rule should be made with regard to the effect of a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity was carefully considered and decided negatively by this court in State v. Bott, 310 Minn. 331
  • Weiby v. Wente 264 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1978
  • Weiby v. Wente 264 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1978
    See, State v. Bott, Minn., note 3, discussing with approval Rule 403, Federal Rules of Evidence, which is identical to the present Minnesota rule.
  • State v. Clarken 260 N.W.2d 463 Minn. 1977
  • State v. Clarken 260 N.W.2d 463 Minn. 1977
    See, State v. Wendler, Minn., State v. Bott, Minn.
  • State v. Paige 256 N.W.2d 298 Minn. 1977
  • State v. Paige 256 N.W.2d 298 Minn. 1977
    State v. Bott, Minn., (insanity defense).
  • State v. Wendler 252 N.W.2d 266 Minn. 1977