Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Burt v. State, 256 N.W.2d 633.

35 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Jeremiah Quan Turner Minn. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Jeremiah Quan Turner Minn. 2026
The district court “ ‘must investigate as long and as thoroughly as the circumstances of the case before him demand.’ ” (quoting Von Moltke v. Gillies, 332 U.S. 708, 723–24 (1948)).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Margaret Ann Frank Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Margaret Ann Frank Minn. Ct. App. 2024
waiver of counsel was “cursory.” In support of this argument, Frank correctly observes that, if the “mental competency of the defendant comes into question,” the law requires a district court to ensure that the defendant is competent to “make a knowing and intelligent waiver of his right to the assistance of counsel.” -36 (Minn. 1977) (reversing an order denying postconviction relief because a presentence investigation report—that the district court had access to—raised serious doubts about the
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-36 (Minn. 1977) (concluding that a waiver was not adequately shown to be intelligent where the district court repeatedly advised defendant of his right to counsel and defendant refused but defendant was of lower-than -average intelligence and the court should have made a more detailed inquiry as to the defenda
A22-1093 Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-36 (Minn. 1977) (concluding that a waiver was not adequately shown to be intelligent where the defendant was of lower-than-average intelligence and the court should have made a more detailed inquiry as to the defendant’s capacity); Krejci, d at 412 (“The trial court told 11 defendant that if he cha
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
d 633, 636 (Minn. 1977).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 835, 95 S. Ct. 2525, 2541 (1975)
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
1(4) (requiring a defendant facing a felony charge to voluntarily and intelligently waive the right to counsel); Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 835, 95 S. Ct. 2525, 2541 (1975)
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Haggins 798 N.W.2d 86 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Haggins 798 N.W.2d 86 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
2525, 2541 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975)
Bruestle v. State 719 N.W.2d 698 Minn. 2006
Bruestle v. State 719 N.W.2d 698 Minn. 2006
In support of this claim, requires that he be granted relief.
State v. Hawanchak 669 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Hawanchak 669 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Camacho 561 N.W.2d 160 Minn. 1997
State v. Camacho 561 N.W.2d 160 Minn. 1997
State v. Brodie 529 N.W.2d 395 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Brodie 529 N.W.2d 395 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Id., at 412 ( -35 (Minn. 1977)).
State v. Krejci 458 N.W.2d 407 Minn. 1990
State v. Krejci 458 N.W.2d 407 Minn. 1990
-35 (Minn.1977) (citation omitted).
State v. Krejci 441 N.W.2d 510 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Krejci 441 N.W.2d 510 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
see also Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 835 , 95 S.Ct.
State v. Rubin 409 N.W.2d 504 Minn. 1987
State v. Rubin 409 N.W.2d 504 Minn. 1987
which was a guilty plea case, we “strongly encourage[d]” trial courts to liberally use the authority provided in Minn.R.Crim.P.
State v. Lande 376 N.W.2d 483 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Lande 376 N.W.2d 483 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Hanson 360 N.W.2d 460 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Hanson 360 N.W.2d 460 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See, where we reversed an order denying postconviction relief from a conviction based on an uncounseled guilty plea.
State v. Motl 337 N.W.2d 664 Minn. 1983
State v. Motl 337 N.W.2d 664 Minn. 1983
See, where we reversed an order denying postconviction relief from a conviction based on an uncounseled guilty plea.
State v. Jones 266 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1978
State v. Jones 266 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1978
The second case was Burt v. State, Minn., which raised the issue in the context of a guilty plea by a defendant without counsel.