Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Greer v. Kooiker, 253 N.W.2d 133.

67 citing documents.

Rum River Timber Harvesting, Inc. v. Greg Jeddeloh Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Rum River Timber Harvesting, Inc. v. Greg Jeddeloh Minn. Ct. App. 2025
SN4, LLC v. Anchor Bank, fsb, (citing Radke, d at 891), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
First and Third Properties, LLC, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See Greer v. Kooiker , & n.2 (Minn. 1977) (explaining that statute of frauds, which states that certain contracts “shall be void,” actually renders them voidable (quotation omitted)); In re Sprain ’s Est., 272 N.W.
Joey Gunderson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Minn. Stat. § 513.05 (2024)
Shane A. Kennedy, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See, e.g., Gartner v. Eikill , ( “In the 8 absence of fraud or misrepresentation, a p erson who signs a contract may not avoid it on the ground that he did not read it or thought its terms to be different.” ); Greer v. Kooiker, 312 Minn. 499, 508, (noting “a party to a contract .
Doran Development, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
The elements that must be specified in the memorandum are “(1) [a] statement of the consideration; (2) an adequate description of the parties; (3) an adequate description of the land; (4) the general terms and conditions of the transaction; and (5) subscription by the vendor.”
Amos Graves v. Michael Wayman, First Minnesota Bank 859 N.W.2d 791 Minn. 2015
SN4, LLC v. Anchor Bank, FSB 848 N.W.2d 559 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
SN4, LLC v. Anchor Bank, FSB 848 N.W.2d 559 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“[T]he test of adequate ‘subscription’ [is] whether the offeror intended to authenticate the document....” Greer v. Kooiker, 312 Minn. 499 , 506 n. 4, , 139 n. 4 (1977).
McLaughlin v. Heikkila 697 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
McLaughlin v. Heikkila 697 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
See, e.g., Greer v. Kooiker, 312 Minn. 499, 505, 507-8 , 140 (1977) (listing only the signature of the vendor as an essential element of a contract for the sale of land in dictum but affirming a finding that a memorandum signed by both parties to a real estate transaction was a binding contract); Radke v. Brenon, 271 Minn. 35, 40-41 , 134
Rosenberg v. Heritage Renovations, LLC 685 N.W.2d 320 Minn. 2004
Rosenberg v. Heritage Renovations, LLC 685 N.W.2d 320 Minn. 2004
Earned Commissions Generally, a broker earns his commission “when he has performed all that he undertook to perform.” Greer v. Kooiker, 312 Minn. 499, 510
Powell v. MVE Holdings, Inc. 626 N.W.2d 451 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Powell v. MVE Holdings, Inc. 626 N.W.2d 451 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Id.; Greer v. Kooiker, 312 Minn. 499, 507 , -40 (1977) (upholding district court finding of oral contract because finding was not clearly erroneous).
Estate of Peterson 579 N.W.2d 488 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Estate of Peterson 579 N.W.2d 488 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
In Greer v. Kooiker, 312 Minn. 499 , the supreme court considered whether a memorandum that expressed the terms of a contract to purchase land was sufficient to comply with a statutory requirement that the contract be in writing.
Krogness v. Best Buy Co., Inc. 524 N.W.2d 282 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Krogness v. Best Buy Co., Inc. 524 N.W.2d 282 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
I. “A broker is entitled to his commission when he has performed all that he undertook to perform.” Greer v. Kooiker, 312 Minn. 499, 510
Matter of Welfare of DSS 506 N.W.2d 650 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Matter of Welfare of DSS 506 N.W.2d 650 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Greer v. Kooiker, 312 Minn. 499, 511-12
City of Ramsey v. Amusement Center, Inc. 498 N.W.2d 25 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
City of Ramsey v. Amusement Center, Inc. 498 N.W.2d 25 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Greer v. Kooiker, 312 Minn. 499, 507
Rural American Bank of Greenwald v. Herickhoff 485 N.W.2d 702 Minn. 1992
Rural American Bank of Greenwald v. Herickhoff 485 N.W.2d 702 Minn. 1992
The basic purpose of the writing requirements is to “provide reasonable safeguards to insure honest dealing and [the statute of frauds] was not enacted to make a fetish of literal statutory compliance or a fetish of requiring a perfect written contract.” Greer v. Kooiker, 312 Minn. 499, 505 , citing Doyle v. Wohlrabe, 243 Minn. 107, 110
Maloney v. Fairview Community Hospital 451 N.W.2d 237 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Maloney v. Fairview Community Hospital 451 N.W.2d 237 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Greer v. Kooiker, 312 Minn. 499, 511-12
Olson v. Ronhovde 446 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Olson v. Ronhovde 446 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Finally, in construing the statute of frauds, “the basic end of the statute must be furthered.” Greer v. Kooiker, 312 Minn. 499, 505
Iowa Concrete Breaking Corp. v. Jewat Trucking, Inc. 444 N.W.2d 865 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Iowa Concrete Breaking Corp. v. Jewat Trucking, Inc. 444 N.W.2d 865 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
§ 544.36 (1986) was not made to the trial court and "an unliti-gated issue may not be asserted for the first time on appeal.” Greer v. Kooiker, 312 Minn. 499, 511-42
Thompson Plumbing Co. v. J.E.C., Inc. 422 N.W.2d 26 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Thompson Plumbing Co. v. J.E.C., Inc. 422 N.W.2d 26 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See Greer v. Kooiker, 312 Minn. 499, 511-12
Holstad v. Southwestern Porcelain, Inc. 421 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Holstad v. Southwestern Porcelain, Inc. 421 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See Greer v. Kooiker, 312 Minn. 499, 511-12
Crown Coco, Inc. v. Red Fox Restaurant of Royalton, Inc. 409 N.W.2d 919 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Crown Coco, Inc. v. Red Fox Restaurant of Royalton, Inc. 409 N.W.2d 919 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
A description of land is sufficient if it “provides, when applied to the physical features of the surrounding terrain, a reasonably certain guide or means for identifying such land * * Greer v. Kooiker, 312 Minn. 499, 506 , (quoting Miracle Construction Co. v. Miller, 251 Minn. 320, 323 , ).
Huseman v. Life Insurance Co. of North America 402 N.W.2d 618 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Huseman v. Life Insurance Co. of North America 402 N.W.2d 618 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Greer v. Kooiker, 312 Minn. 499, 508
Bosold v. Ban Con, Inc. 392 N.W.2d 724 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Bosold v. Ban Con, Inc. 392 N.W.2d 724 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Greer v. Kooiker, 312 Minn. 499
Fogerty v. Rosenwald 391 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Fogerty v. Rosenwald 391 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
§ 287.02 (1984); Greer v. Kooiker, 3 12 Minn. 499, 509
Century 21-Birdsell Realty, Inc. v. Hiebel 379 N.W.2d 201 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Century 21-Birdsell Realty, Inc. v. Hiebel 379 N.W.2d 201 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Greer v. Kooiker, 312 Minn. 499, 510
Teachout v. Wilson 376 N.W.2d 460 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Teachout v. Wilson 376 N.W.2d 460 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See Greer v. Kooiker, 312 Minn. 499
Aesoph v. Golden 367 N.W.2d 639 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Aesoph v. Golden 367 N.W.2d 639 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See Greer v. Kooiker, 312 Minn. 499, 507 , (“parties may assent to a contract one of the terms of which is that a later, more formal evidence of it may be executed”).
Better Homes & Gardens v. Bittmann 357 N.W.2d 351 Minn. Ct. App. 1984