Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hake v. Soo Line Railway Co., 258 N.W.2d 576.

28 citing documents.

Tal Sarusi individually and d/b/a Sealed Envelope LLC, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Anthony Kelley, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Co., (“A party is not permitted to remain silent, gamble on the outcome, and, having lost, then for the first time claim misconduct in opposing counsel’s argument.”).
Carney Lien, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Steven Brown, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Co., the supreme court affirmed a future-damages award based on a physician’s testimony that, “chances are .
Lake Superior Center Authority v. Hammel, Green & Abrahamson, Inc. 715 N.W.2d 458 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Lake Superior Center Authority v. Hammel, Green & Abrahamson, Inc. 715 N.W.2d 458 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Ray v. Miller Meester Advertising, Inc. 684 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 2004
Ray v. Miller Meester Advertising, Inc. 684 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 2004
Co., (providing that the jury could consider a special damage award that consisted of future medical expenses and future lost wages).
Heine v. Simon 674 N.W.2d 411 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Heine v. Simon 674 N.W.2d 411 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Cox v. Crown CoCo, Inc. 544 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Cox v. Crown CoCo, Inc. 544 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Poston v. Colestock 540 N.W.2d 92 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Poston v. Colestock 540 N.W.2d 92 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
See, (holding new trial unnecessary despite court’s failure to give curative instruction when improper arguments warranted one); Stanger v. Gordon, 309 Minn. 215, 222 , (holding that attorney’s uncorrected reference to Watergate scandal in a fraud action, although erroneous, did
GN Danavox, Inc. v. Starkey Laboratories, Inc. 476 N.W.2d 172 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
GN Danavox, Inc. v. Starkey Laboratories, Inc. 476 N.W.2d 172 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Kath v. Burlington Northern Railroad 441 N.W.2d 569 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Kath v. Burlington Northern Railroad 441 N.W.2d 569 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Jewett v. Deutsch 437 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Jewett v. Deutsch 437 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Bisbee v. Ruppert, 306 Minn. 39, 47
Peterson v. Burlington Northern Railroad 399 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Peterson v. Burlington Northern Railroad 399 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Omlid v. Lee 391 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Omlid v. Lee 391 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Cafferty v. Monson 360 N.W.2d 414 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Cafferty v. Monson 360 N.W.2d 414 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
where an attorney allegedly inspired passion and prejudice by incorporating irrelevant references in his closing argument: *417 An objection to improper remarks, a request for curative instruction, and a refusal by the trial court to take corrective action are generally prerequisites to the obtaining of a
Pietrzak v. Eggen 295 N.W.2d 504 Minn. 1980
Pietrzak v. Eggen 295 N.W.2d 504 Minn. 1980
We held that the need for future surgery was established to a