Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Dunshee v. Douglas, 255 N.W.2d 42.
- Bryson v. Pillsbury Co. 573 N.W.2d 718 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
- Bryson v. Pillsbury Co. 573 N.W.2d 718 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
- Cherne Contracting Corp. v. Wausau Insurance Companies 572 N.W.2d 339 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
- Cherne Contracting Corp. v. Wausau Insurance Companies 572 N.W.2d 339 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
- Miller-Lagro v. Northern States Power Co. 566 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
- Miller-Lagro v. Northern States Power Co. 566 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
- Matter of Welfare of AY-J. 558 N.W.2d 757 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
-
Matter of Welfare of AY-J.
558 N.W.2d 757
Minn. Ct. App. 1997
(“granting of a continuance is a matter within the discretion of the trial court and its ruling will not be reversed absent a showing of clear abuse of discretion”).
- In Re the Welfare of J.S.J. 550 N.W.2d 290 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
- In Re the Welfare of J.S.J. 550 N.W.2d 290 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
- Fabio v. Bellomo 504 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 1993
-
Fabio v. Bellomo
504 N.W.2d 758
Minn. 1993
ave been upheld in traditional tort actions, but we find those recoveries easily distinguishable; e.g., Mack v. McGrath, 276 Minn. 419, 423 , 150 * (holding that recovery for risk of malfunction of remaining kidney was “generous but not excessive” because it was “fair comment with respect to the implications of * * * being left with only one kidney”), (upholding recovery for risk of future stroke resulting from accident causing scar formation in carotid artery when stroke proven to be reasonably
- In Re the Welfare of J.A.S. 488 N.W.2d 332 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- In Re the Welfare of J.A.S. 488 N.W.2d 332 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- Thies v. St. Paul's Evangelical Lutheran Church of Litchfield 489 N.W.2d 277 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- Thies v. St. Paul's Evangelical Lutheran Church of Litchfield 489 N.W.2d 277 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- Matter of Muntner 470 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Matter of Muntner 470 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Lind v. Slowinski 450 N.W.2d 353 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
-
Lind v. Slowinski
450 N.W.2d 353
Minn. Ct. App. 1990
“[T]he admissibility of expert testimony rests within the sound discretion of the trial court, and its decision will not be reversed on appeal unless there is a showing of clear abuse of discretion.”
- Andrasko v. Andrasko 443 N.W.2d 228 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- Andrasko v. Andrasko 443 N.W.2d 228 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- Herbst v. Northern States Power Co. 432 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Herbst v. Northern States Power Co. 432 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Gabrielson v. Warnemunde 430 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Gabrielson v. Warnemunde 430 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Marriage of Jones v. Jones 402 N.W.2d 146 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Marriage of Jones v. Jones 402 N.W.2d 146 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Kanter v. Metropolitan Medical Center 384 N.W.2d 914 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Kanter v. Metropolitan Medical Center 384 N.W.2d 914 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Schaffer 378 N.W.2d 115 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
State v. Schaffer
378 N.W.2d 115
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Recently, we at least implied that the same basic rule should govern all kinds of expert accident reconstruction testimony, and that that rule is the one which has been followed with respect to expert testimony concerning speed.
- Weise v. Commissioner of Public Safety 370 N.W.2d 676 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Weise v. Commissioner of Public Safety 370 N.W.2d 676 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Krueger v. Nordstrom 367 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Krueger v. Nordstrom
367 N.W.2d 671
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
as support for her position.
- State v. Packard 366 N.W.2d 721 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Packard 366 N.W.2d 721 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Westbrook State Bank v. Anderson Land & Cattle Co. 364 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Westbrook State Bank v. Anderson Land & Cattle Co.
364 N.W.2d 416
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
the supreme court explained: The granting of a continuance is a matter within the discretion of the trial court and its ruling will not be reversed absent a showing of clear abuse of discretion.
- Sorensen v. Maski 361 N.W.2d 498 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Sorensen v. Maski 361 N.W.2d 498 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Southwest Fidelity State Bank of Edina v. Apollo Corporate Travel Inc. 360 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Southwest Fidelity State Bank of Edina v. Apollo Corporate Travel Inc.
360 N.W.2d 668
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Lehman v. Lehman, 216 Minn. 538, 542-43
- Cafferty v. Monson 360 N.W.2d 414 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Cafferty v. Monson 360 N.W.2d 414 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- McPherson v. Buege 360 N.W.2d 344 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- McPherson v. Buege 360 N.W.2d 344 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Dahlbeck v. DICO Co., Inc. 355 N.W.2d 157 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Dahlbeck v. DICO Co., Inc. 355 N.W.2d 157 Minn. Ct. App. 1984