Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite LaValle v. Aqualand Pool Co., Inc., 257 N.W.2d 324.

78 citing documents.

David Schindele, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“The owner of real property is competent to testify concerning the value it would have had if constructed according to the contract and its value as actually constructed.”
Severin M. Chmielewski, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Kwapien, d at 184 (remittitur); (new trial).
Galaxy Wireless, LLC v. Western National Mutual Insurance Company 8 N.W.3d 698 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Galaxy Wireless, LLC v. Western National Mutual Insurance Company 8 N.W.3d 698 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Johnson v. Garages, Etc., Inc., ().
West St. Paul Federation of Teachers v. Independent School District No. 197 713 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
West St. Paul Federation of Teachers v. Independent School District No. 197 713 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Clifford v. Geritom Med, Inc. 681 N.W.2d 680 Minn. 2004
Clifford v. Geritom Med, Inc. 681 N.W.2d 680 Minn. 2004
Haugen v. Int’l Transp., Inc., LaValle v. Aqualand Pool Co., Inc., Lamb, d at 856 .
Nuessmeier Electric, Inc. v. Weiss Manufacturing Co. 632 N.W.2d 248 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Nuessmeier Electric, Inc. v. Weiss Manufacturing Co. 632 N.W.2d 248 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Sentinel Management Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 615 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 2000
Sentinel Management Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 615 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 2000
hold the court’s decision “unless the verdict is so contrary to the preponderance of the evidence as to imply that the jury failed to consider all the evidence or acted under some mistake or from some improper motive, bias, feeling or caprice, instead of honestly and dispassionately exercising its judgment.” -56 (Minn.1983) ().
LeDoux v. Northwest Publishing, Inc. 521 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
LeDoux v. Northwest Publishing, Inc. 521 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Mertes v. Estate of King 501 N.W.2d 660 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Mertes v. Estate of King 501 N.W.2d 660 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Green v. City of Coon Rapids 485 N.W.2d 712 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Green v. City of Coon Rapids 485 N.W.2d 712 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
The court should not grant a new trial unless the conflict between the verdict and the preponderance of the evidence suggests that the jury “failed to consider all the evidence or acted under some mistake or from some improper motive, bias, feeling or caprice.”
Reider v. City of Spring Lake Park 480 N.W.2d 662 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Reider v. City of Spring Lake Park 480 N.W.2d 662 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
ld not be granted unless the verdict is so contrary to the preponderance of the evidence as to imply that the jury failed to consider all of the evidence or acted under some mistake or from some improper motive, bias, feeling or caprice, instead of honestly and dispassionately exercising its judgment.” -56 (Minn.1983) (quoting LaValle v. Aqualand Pool Co., Inc., ).
Peters v. Independent School District Number 657 477 N.W.2d 757 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Peters v. Independent School District Number 657 477 N.W.2d 757 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Gorecki v. County of Hennepin, Dept. of Public Works 443 N.W.2d 236 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Gorecki v. County of Hennepin, Dept. of Public Works 443 N.W.2d 236 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
LaValle v. Aqualand Pool Co., Inc.
Gilmore v. Control Data Corp. 442 N.W.2d 835 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Gilmore v. Control Data Corp. 442 N.W.2d 835 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
LaValle v. Aqualand Pool Co., Inc.
Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp. 430 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp. 430 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Robinson v. MacK Trucks, Inc. 426 N.W.2d 220 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Robinson v. MacK Trucks, Inc. 426 N.W.2d 220 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Leach v. Estate of Dahl 419 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Leach v. Estate of Dahl 419 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Gale v. Howard 413 N.W.2d 234 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Gale v. Howard 413 N.W.2d 234 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Gertken v. Farmers Elevator of Kensington, Minnesota, Inc. 411 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Gertken v. Farmers Elevator of Kensington, Minnesota, Inc. 411 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Shipka v. Helvig 405 N.W.2d 248 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Shipka v. Helvig 405 N.W.2d 248 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-56 (Minn.1983) (quoting LaValle v. Aqualand Pool Co., Inc., ).
Betzold v. Sherwin 404 N.W.2d 286 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Betzold v. Sherwin 404 N.W.2d 286 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
LaValle v. Aqualand Pool Co., Inc., -28 (Minn.1977).
Tate v. Scanlan International, Inc. 403 N.W.2d 666 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Tate v. Scanlan International, Inc. 403 N.W.2d 666 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
LaValle v. Aqualand Pool Co., Inc.
Rands v. Forest Lake Lumber Mart, Inc. 402 N.W.2d 565 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Rands v. Forest Lake Lumber Mart, Inc. 402 N.W.2d 565 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
LaValle v. Aqualand Pool Co., Inc.
Kruchten v. Reichert Bus Service, Inc. 392 N.W.2d 50 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Kruchten v. Reichert Bus Service, Inc. 392 N.W.2d 50 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
LaValle v. Aqualand Pool Co., Inc.
Hennen v. Huff 388 N.W.2d 408 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Hennen v. Huff 388 N.W.2d 408 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
LaValle v. Aqualand Pool Co., Inc., (citing DeWitt v. Schubauer, 287 Minn. 279 , ).
Benson v. Rostad 384 N.W.2d 190 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Benson v. Rostad 384 N.W.2d 190 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
LaValle v. Aqualand Pool Co., Inc.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by