Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Naig v. Bloomington Sanitation, 258 N.W.2d 891.

108 citing documents.

M.W. Ettinger Transfer & Leasing Co. v. Schaper Manufacturing, Inc. 494 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 1992
Harmon Contract Glazing, Inc. v. Libby-Owens-Ford Co. 493 N.W.2d 146 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Harmon Contract Glazing, Inc. v. Libby-Owens-Ford Co. 493 N.W.2d 146 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
McDonough v. Muska Electric Co. 486 N.W.2d 768 Minn. 1992
McDonough v. Muska Electric Co. 486 N.W.2d 768 Minn. 1992
M.W. Ettinger Transfer & Leasing Co. v. Schaper Manufacturing, Inc. 482 N.W.2d 796 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
M.W. Ettinger Transfer & Leasing Co. v. Schaper Manufacturing, Inc. 482 N.W.2d 796 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Gullickson v. Lutsen Resort, Inc. 474 N.W.2d 216 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Gullickson v. Lutsen Resort, Inc. 474 N.W.2d 216 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
(subrogation claim survives employee’s settlement with tortfeasor).
Principal Financial Group v. Allstate Insurance Co. 472 N.W.2d 338 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Folstad v. Eder 467 N.W.2d 608 Minn. 1991
Folstad v. Eder 467 N.W.2d 608 Minn. 1991
Badger Equipment Co. v. Brennan 431 N.W.2d 900 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Badger Equipment Co. v. Brennan 431 N.W.2d 900 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
: If an employee settles only those claims not subject to subrogation by the employer, the employer in no way is prejudiced by the settlement.
Hodder v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. 426 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 1988
Hodder v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. 426 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 1988
For example, see Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp., 312 Minn. 114 , and their progeny.
Todalen v. United States Chemical Co. 424 N.W.2d 73 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Todalen v. United States Chemical Co. 424 N.W.2d 73 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Thus the supreme court pointed out the uniqueness of its decision in Kempa when it stated: Although we have referred to the settlement between Kempa and Clark as a “Naig” settlement, it is in some respects not a because it occurred after-not before-a verdict had been returned.
American Mutual Insurance Co. v. Honeywell, Inc. 422 N.W.2d 274 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
American Mutual Insurance Co. v. Honeywell, Inc. 422 N.W.2d 274 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
an injured employee commenced an action against a third-party tortfeasor.
United Steelworkers, Local 6115 v. Quadna Mountain Corp. 418 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1988
United Steelworkers, Local 6115 v. Quadna Mountain Corp. 418 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1988
Lysholm v. Karlos 414 N.W.2d 773 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Lysholm v. Karlos 414 N.W.2d 773 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Allstate Insurance Co. v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. 410 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 1987
Allstate Insurance Co. v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. 410 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 1987
Ruddy v. Ford Motor Co. 399 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Ruddy v. Ford Motor Co. 399 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
ecuted on January 17 and specifically provided: *636 All the parties to this Settlement Agreement and Naig Release understand and agree that James J. Ruddy is releasing only that part or portion of his claim or cause of action which is not compensa-ble or cognizable under the Minnesota workers’ compensation laws pursuant to the Minnesota Supreme Court’s
Norman v. Refsland 370 N.W.2d 488 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Norman v. Refsland 370 N.W.2d 488 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Kempa v. E.W. Coons Co. 370 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 1985
Kempa v. E.W. Coons Co. 370 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 1985
Although we have referred to the settlement between Kempa and Clark as a “Naig” settlement, it is in some respects not a because it occurred after — not before — a verdict had been returned.
Haase v. Haase 369 N.W.2d 311 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Haase v. Haase 369 N.W.2d 311 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Kaiser v. Northern States Power Co. 353 N.W.2d 899 Minn. 1984
Kaiser v. Northern States Power Co. 353 N.W.2d 899 Minn. 1984
Krause v. Merickel 344 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 1984
Krause v. Merickel 344 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 1984
Easterlin v. State 330 N.W.2d 704 Minn. 1983
Easterlin v. State 330 N.W.2d 704 Minn. 1983
Thereafter, the employee’s counsel without again reporting to the State, commenced a lawsuit against Borowicz and, on October 29, 1980, settled with defendants and their insurer under a release stated to be made “” Employee Easterlin settled for all damage claims not covered under the Workers’ Compensation Act for the sum of $6,000, with the parties expressly acknowledging that the settlement did not affect the “sub-rogation interests” of the plaintiff’s workers’ compensation insurer.
Sargent v. Johnson 323 N.W.2d 767 Minn. 1982
Sargent v. Johnson 323 N.W.2d 767 Minn. 1982
Great American Insurance Co. v. Spoden 316 N.W.2d 740 Minn. 1982
Great American Insurance Co. v. Spoden 316 N.W.2d 740 Minn. 1982
State Farm Insurance Companies v. Galajda 316 N.W.2d 564 Minn. 1982
State Farm Insurance Companies v. Galajda 316 N.W.2d 564 Minn. 1982
from workers’ compensation-related settlements to no-fault-related settlements.
Jones v. Fisher 309 N.W.2d 726 Minn. 1981
Jones v. Fisher 309 N.W.2d 726 Minn. 1981
the employee settled with the third-party tortfeasor for $18,000 for only those claims not subject to the employer’s subrogation interest; namely, pain and suffering, humiliation, and loss of consortium.
Nelson v. State, Department of Natural Resources 305 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 1981
Nelson v. State, Department of Natural Resources 305 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 1981
Lang v. William Bros. Boiler & Manufacturing Co., 250 Minn. 521

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by